Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Presented by
JITHIN MIDHUN JOHN MIGDAD MITHUN MUKESH NASEEM SAJEEH SAJITH
Overview
What is it?
A systematic and objective assessment of an ongoing or completed project
Design Implementation Results
Involves gathering, analysing, interpreting and reporting information Should be based on credible data
Purpose
Learning and improvement Accountability provide useful feed back to stakeholders;
entrepreneurs, sponsors, donors, client-groups, administrators, staff, and other relevant constituencies
Types of Evaluation
BASED ON TIMING
Exante evaluation
Conducted before the implementation of a project as part of the planning Also referred to as appraisal or quality at entry
Ex-post evaluation
Conducted after the project is completed Used to assess sustainability of project effects, impacts Identifies factors of success to inform other projects
POSITION OF EVALUATOR
Internal or self assessment Internally guided reflective processes Initiated and controlled by the group for its own learning and improvement. Sometimes done by consultants who are outsiders to the project Need to clarify ownership of information before the review starts External evaluation Initiated and controlled by the donor as part of contractual agreement Conducted by independent people who are not involved in implementation Often guided by project staff
METHODOLOGY
1. Quantitative 2. Qualitative
Evaluations take up significant time and resources Need to ensure that the costs are appropriate for the anticipated benefits. Some considerations: Importance of the evaluation to AGRIS or the donor-does it need to take place? Ability and readiness of AGRIS and partners to engage in the evaluation-Is there a reason that the evaluation should be postponed? Cancelled? Size of the evaluation. Setting the focus and scope for the evaluation Resourcing the evaluation: Money? Technical expertise?
Defining scope and size Clarify if external or internal Level of effort and resources required / available Stakeholder groups to be involved and how. Full stakeholder desirable, but could be limited to the following: Deciding whether or not to evaluate. Defining the type of evaluation, its scope, and criteria. Defining the evaluation questions, what are the key issues to explore in the evaluation? Defining evaluation work plan. Evaluation activities must be scheduled and fit into the stakeholders' agendas. Deciding which recommendations to adopt and which to reject. Disseminating and gathering feedback on the results.
CONTINUE...
The project manager is responsible for ensuring clear and focused TORs This is as far as the Manager is responsible for development of the TOR
A poor work plan leads to poor evaluation Important that the leadership of the project review and approve the evaluation work plan
Steps In Evaluation
Planning Selecting object (setting objectives) Methodology
Deciding on standards Choice of measures Data collection Data analysis