Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Historical perspective
Portfolios widely used for many years Late 80s interest in portfolios for assessment (Belanoff and Dickson 1991) 90s saw advent of e portfolios A shift in emphasis away from assessment to learning?
Definitions
collection of student work that demonstrates achievement or improvement (Stiggins 1994) a portfolio is a collection of evidence that is gathered together to show a persons learning journey over time and to demonstrate their abilities (Butler 2006)
Definitions
student writing over time, which contains exhibits showing the stages in the writing processes a text has gone through and the stages of the writers growth as a writer, and evidence of the writers self-reflection on her/his identity and progress as a writer (Hamp-Lyons
1996)
Definitions
portfolios are prepared with a particular audience in mind, are selective and call for judgments (Calfee and Freedman 1996)
Definitions
a purposeful collection of student work that illustrates efforts, progress, and achievement in one or more areas [over time]. The collection must include: student participation in selecting contents, the criteria for selection, the criteria for judging merit, and evidence of selfreflection (The Northwest Evaluation Association
cited in Barret 2005)
The degree to which these characteristics are evidenced in portfolios largely depends on their purpose.
A portfolio is a purposeful collection of student work that exhibits the students progress and achievements in one or more areas.
The collection must include: student participation in selecting contents the criteria for selection
The purpose of creating a portfolio is to enable the student to demonstrate to others learning and progress.
The value is that, in building them, students become active participants in the learning process and its assessment.
3. A portfolio provides samples of the students work which show growth over time 4. The criteria for selecting and assessing the portfolio contents must be clear to the teacher and the students at the outset of the process.
4. Portfolio assessment is a tool for assessing a variety of skills not normally testable in a single setting for traditional testing.
5. Portfolio assessment develops awareness of own learning by the students. 6. Portfolio assessment caters to individuals in a heterogeneous class.
7. Portfolio assessment develop social skills. Students interact with other students in the development of their own portfolio.
4.
Dates on all entries, to facilitate proof of growth over time. Draft of aural/oral and written products and revised version; e.g., first drafts and corrected/revised versions. Reflections can appear at different stages in the learning process (for formative and/or summative purposes) and at the lower levels can be written in the mother tongue.
5.
6.
For each item a brief rationale for choosing the item should be included.
Students can choose to reflect upon some of the following:
What did I learn from it? What did I do well? Why did I choose this item? What do I want to improve in the item?
StudentTeacher Conference
Purpose
Involves specific learning targets the targets that reflect all contents are broader and more general
development as a reader speaks clearly Adapts writing styles to different purposes
Types of Portfolios
The types of portfolios differ from each other depending on the purposes or objectives set for the overall classroom assessment program.
As a rule, portfolio assessment is used where traditional testing is inadequate to measure desired skills and competencies.
Types of portfolio
a process portfolio a showcase portfolio an assessment portfolio A dossier portfolio A reflective portfolio A classroom portfolio A positivist portfolio A constructivist portfolio A personal portfolio A structured portfolio An employment portfolio A working portfolio
Types of Portfolios
1. Documentation Portfolio involves a collection of work over time showing growth and improvement reflecting students learning of identified outcomes.
growth portfolio can include everything from brainstorming activities to drafts to finished products.
3. Showcase Portfolio shows the best of the students outputs and products.
Best used for summative evaluation of students mastery of key curriculum outcomes. Should include students best work, determined through a combination of student and teacher selection.
Should include written analysis and reflections by the student upon the decision-making process used to determine which works are included
Rating criteria
Thoughtfulness (including evidence of students monitoring of their own comprehension, metacognitive reflection, and productive habits of mind) Growth and development in relationship to key curriculum expectancies and indicators Understanding and application of key processes Completeness, correctness, and appropriateness of products and processes presented in the portfolio Diversity of entries (e.g., use of multiple formats to demonstrate achievement of designed performance standards)
In evolving an evaluation criteria, teachers and students must work together and agree on the criteria to be applied tot eh portfolio.
Such evaluative criteria need to be set and agreed prior to the development of the portfolio. The criteria to be used may be formative (i.e., throughout the instructional time period) or summative (i.e., as part of culminating project, activity or related assessment to determine the extent to which identified curricular expectancies, indicators, and standards have been achieved)
Description
Shows limited awareness of portfolio goals Has difficulty understanding the process of revision Demonstrates little evidence of progress over time Limited explanation of choices made Has difficulty relating to self/peer assessment Reflects awareness of some portfolio goals Understands the process of revision to a certain extent Demonstrates some evidence of progress over time Explains choices made in a relevant way Relates to self/peer assessment Reflects awareness pf portfolio goals Understands the process of revision Demonstrates evidence of progress over time Fully explains choices made Reaches high level of reliability in self/peer assessment Draws conclusions about his/her learning
47
8 10
Students and teacher work together to identify significant or important artifacts and processes to be captured in the portfolio.
to determine grades or scores to be assigned
For grading and scoring, rubrics, rules and scoring keys can be designed for a variety of portfolio components. Letter grades might also be assigned, where appropriate. For summative purposes, a panel of interviewers be designated to evaluate the students portfolio based on the agreed set of criteria.
Each portfolio entry needs to be assessed with reference to its specific goals Self and peer-assessment can also be used for formative evaluation, with students having to justify their grades with reference to the goals and to specific pages in the portfolio.
Student-Teacher Conferences
The main philosophy embedded in portfolio assessment is shared and active assessment.
For formative evaluation process, The teacher should have short individual meetings with each student, in which progress is discussed and goals are set for future meeting The student and the teacher keep careful documentation of the meetings noting the significant agreements and findings in each session.
Notes from conferences have to be included in the portfolio as they contain joint decisions about the individuals strengths and weaknesses.
Disadvantages
Scoring difficulty may lead to low reliability
Impact
Herman and Winter (1994) based on self-reports from teachers and others implementing portfolios appears to have positive effects on instruction Vermont principals affirmed that the portfolio assessment program had beneficial effects on curriculum and instruction
Impact
Hirvela and Sweetland (2005) used 2 case studies showing the 2 students did not strongly endorse the portfolios as used in 2 different courses.
Seemed to need more explanations of what portfolio approaches were meant to achieve Even with a 5% final course grade students saw the portfolio as essentially summative in nature