Professional Documents
Culture Documents
July, 2000
Todays Objectives
Understand the business case for people management Examine newspaper survey results 3
The Mega-Study
Premise
Our employees are our most valuable resource and therefore, the management of people makes a significant difference to company performance.
Challenge
2
2001 Readership Institute
Economic Factors
Relative market share Company size Industry profitability
People Factors
Core drivers High-impact practices Specific actions Constructive culture
33%
67%
3
2001 Readership Institute
Correlational Studies
4
2001 Readership Institute
Empirical Validity
Very Strong
Culture
Employee Satisfaction & Retention
READERSHIP?
Customer Satisfaction and Retention 3 Employee Satisfaction and Retention
CULTURE
Change Management Creativity & Innovation
Selection
CULTURE
2
Compensation Performance Management Development
CULTURE
1
Knowledge Management
Leadership
CULTURE
6
2001 2001Readership ReadershipInstitute Institute
IV
V
100,001 200,000
200,001+
7
2001 2001Readership ReadershipInstitute Institute
DRIVERS
(4 + 1 sections of the survey) Level 2
What to focus on
SPECIFIC ACTIONS
(90 Survey Questions)
8
2001 2001Readership ReadershipInstitute Institute
Development
22-25
Clear mutual expectations Stretch objectives with meaningful measures Ongoing coaching and feedback Market-based compensation Performance-driven rewards and recognition Alignment of employee and shareholder interests Latitude and authority for determining how best to execute job accountabilities, particularly to meet customer needs Quality and sustainability of highly effective leadership, particularly employees immediate supervisor Extent to which employees possess the knowledge and skills to contribute plus the opportunity to grow and advance Customer satisfaction is a high priority and is balanced with making the numbersplusrewards are provided for contributions
26-27
28-30
Employee Retention*
33
9
2001 2001Readership ReadershipInstitute Institute
Development lowest
Amazingly flat!
10
2001 Readership Institute
Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree 29% 18% 13% 9% 31%
-20% 20%
40% -40%
-60% 60% -80% 80%
69%
-100% 100%
Selection
Development
Performance Management
11
Compensation
Employee Retention
X1 denotes the Drivers High-Impact Practice Disagree in the order it appears in your reports Strongly Disagree
64 44 31 27 10 14 18 18 45 23 49 55
24
12
17
39
41 56 55 65 51
35
45
69
88 83
73 90 85
P1 P2 P3
81
C1
82
C2
76
-100% 100% S1 S2 S3 D1 D2 D3
D4
C3
R1
R2
R3
R4
Selection
Relevant Page in Consolidated Report
Development
17
Performance Management
28
Compensation
37
Employee Retention
46
2001 2001Readership ReadershipInstitute Institute
12
13
2001 Readership Institute
Ingredients
Enablers
Differentiators
14
2001 2001Readership ReadershipInstitute Institute
Newspaper Results
Findings
Insights & Implications Typically the most advanced Driver in stable or static industries that have undergone little change
Other Drivers are characteristically brought into play more strongly as companies and industries are confronted by major change
Development is lowest!*
15
2001 Readership Institute
2.9
2.8
2.7
2.6
2.5
2.4
2.3
2.2
Selection
Development
Performance Management
16
Compensation
Employee Retention
17
2001 2001Readership ReadershipInstitute Institute
18
2001 2001Readership ReadershipInstitute Institute
19
2001 2001Readership ReadershipInstitute Institute
21
2001 Readership Institute
Industry Transformation
High
Successful Change
Today
Performance
Newspapers? Triggers: Competitors Changing needs Technology Economics Demographics
Low Time
22
2001 2001Readership ReadershipInstitute Institute
Emerging Theme #5: Newspapers are more effective at and inclined to manage vertically versus horizontally
Driver Top Strengths
The standards we use for selecting internal candidates for open positions are set at relatively high levels The selection standards we use for outside hires are set at relatively high levels Selection of qualified people for position vacancies is a top priority of our newspaper's leaders We encourage self-nomination to open positions
Greatest Weaknesses
Our selection process is efficient (i.e. provides us with qualified people quickly) When we consider candidates from outside the newspaper to fill job openings, the size and quality of our external applicant pool is strong (i.e., we consistently choose among many qualified candidates) Our leaders are held accountable for attracting and selecting high-caliber candidates from outside the industry Our newspaper possesses and continuously updates a newspaper-wide database that keeps track of competencies and skills individuals need to succeed in their positions Attending training programs for at least 35 hours a year is strongly encouraged by our newspaper
Selection
Development
Our newspaper's leaders place a high priority on developing people Managers generally help their subordinates meet their career aspirations Qualified employees generally demonstrate sufficient initiative in developing their own skills
Our organization systematically and regularly reviews its talent pools frequently (i.e. at least twice a year)
Performance Management
We believe that one of the primary purposes of performance management in our newspaper is to support the execution of our business strategy Performance evaluations entail a discussion of an employee's performance, including the manager's own perspective on the employee's performance Performance evaluation discussions focus both on recent performance and identifying development needs
Our strategies and strategic plans are regularly communicated so that all employees understand how their performance expectations are linked to them Each person's performance evaluation incorporates input from people within the company who are impacted by their work Performance evaluations incorporate input from the employee's peers/ team
23
2001 2001Readership ReadershipInstitute Institute
Emerging Theme #5: Newspapers are more effective at and inclined to manage vertically versus horizontally
Driver Top Strengths
Performance is the key determinant in establishing variable compensation (i.e., incentive) levels Our newspaper effectively recognizes (formally and informally) performance that supports our goal Change in overall job accountabilities is a key determinant in reviewing fixed (i.e., base salary) levels
Greatest Weaknesses
Our newspaper's compensation programs enable us to attract and retain required talent Change in external market pay levels is a key determinant in reviewing fixed ( base salary) levels Our compensation programs support the philosophy of providing superior rewards for superior performance Share-based compensation (e.g., employee share ownership plans, profit-sharing) for employees is a means of providing a single shared objective that binds together the various entities across our newspaper Employee share ownership is encouraged in our newspaper through our compensation plans
Compensation
Employee Retention
Employees possess a clear understanding of the limits within which they are permitted to act
Achieving high levels of customer satisfaction is a high priority with my superior Employees possess a clear sense of how they personally contribute to meeting customer needs
Our managers spend unusually large amounts of time coaching and developing their subordinates
Employees receive appropriate recognition and rewards for their contributions
24
2001 2001Readership ReadershipInstitute Institute
Customer Retention
High
Low
3.0 Low
80%
60%
40%
20%
4.0 Employee Satisfaction & Retention High 1 Extremely Dissatisfied 2 Somewhat Dissatisfied 3 Slightly Dissatisfied 4 Satisfied 5 Very Satisfied
25
13.6%
14.0%
70
Explanatory Power*
60 50 40 30 20 10 0
14.6%
36.6%
Authority 19.2%
Latitude 36.6%
26
2001 2001Readership ReadershipInstitute Institute
State Farm
Agent tenure 200% longer than industry average Agent productivity 150% higher than industry average
USAA
Most productive organization reflected by home office cost per $1,000 of face value premiums sold
27
2001 2001Readership ReadershipInstitute Institute
Objectives
Get under the survey to gain clarity and commitment to the real issue(s) and their root causes Come back in October with the issues and their root causes the data that is ready then will help you set priorities and begin to act
29
2001 2001Readership ReadershipInstitute Institute
Describe specific outcomes and deliverables that you want them to produce
What specific factors have resulted in our current situation? Why? Build understanding through focus groups and one-on-one interviews.
What has been (is still) the impact on our organization? How do we know? What is our desired future state? Why? If we are successful, what specific differences/impacts would we expect to see become visible? What decisions must we make and what actions must we take, to close gaps? Who needs to be involved in making the above happenbased on expertise, political considerations and the need for the change?
30
2001 2001Readership ReadershipInstitute Institute