Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Challenge of the degradation of the living environment of a significant share of the urban population. As the number of people increases, environmental impact also increases.
1
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0
127 years
1804 1850 1900
26 years 2028 15 years 2013 14 years 1999 12 years 1987 13 years 1974 14 years 1960 33 years 1927
2054
1800
1950
2000
2050
1
11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4
2000
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
Females Males
-8
-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
Females Males
-8
-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
Females Males
-8
-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
North
Brandt Line
South
1985
25%
67%
75%
2000
20%
2025
17%
80%
83%
West
North
East
South
Area of conflict between the first and the second world (Korea, Vietnam, Africa, etc.) Nonaligned nations
Huge migration pressures from developing countries to developed countries. A source of instability and conflicts.
Impacts
The fewer forks school
Environmentalist argument. Rapidly decrease population growth and consumption patterns.
Impacts
Increased use of resources
Including non-renewable resources. Consumption of resources associated with population increase. Vast difference in impact between the birth of a baby in a Third World country and one born in the USA.
The latter will consume vastly greater resources and contribute more to planetary degradation.
Impacts
Primogeniture is often the norm
Only the oldest son gains access to the family's landholdings. Other siblings are then forced off the land and often migrate to towns and cities, causing overpopulation in urban areas.
Increases in pollution
Associated with growing populations - water, air, noise pollution, etc.
Political instability
Increasing competition for decreasing resources. Much of the political instability the Third World nations is the result of limited access to resources.
Impacts
Quality of life
A less tangible impact. Traffic congestion, increasingly difficult access to nature, a sense of personal space, etc.