You are on page 1of 12

QUASI CONTRACTS

DEFINITION
An obligation that the law creates in the absence of an agreement between the parties. It is invoked by the courts where UNJUST ENRICHMENT which occurs when a person retains money or benefits that in all fairness belong to another, would exist without judicial relief.

Page 2

What Are Quasi Contracts


Quasi means almost or apparently but not really or as if it were

A quasi contract is a contract that exists by order of a court, not by agreement of the parties
Courts create quasi contracts to avoid the unjust enrichment of a party in a dispute over payment for a good or service Sections 68 to 72 deals with "certain relations resembling those created by contract" under Indian contract act, 1872

Page 3

Illustration
A victim slips on a banana leaf and falls down a flight stairs Doctor a stranger who happened to be walking by , administers emergency treatment to unconscious victim Doctor does not enter into a contract with victim Doctor could now recover fee for her services on the theory of unjust enrichment This is where Quasi-contract come into play. The court in this case creates a fictional contract to grant benefits to the doctor

Page 4

Sections In Law
The sections in law which cover the Quasi Contracts are

Supply of necessaries (section 68)


Payment of lawful dues by interested person (section 69) Person enjoying benefit of a gratuitous act (section 70) Finder of goods (section 71) Goods or anything delivered by mistake or coercion (section 72)

Page 5

Differences

Contract

Quasi Contract

Contracts results from the will of Quasi Contract is not a the parties expressed with a view contract at all but merely a legal to create an obligation fiction.
It cannot be used when fullfledged contract exists Contract is an agreement There is no agreement

It has certain essential elements

Essentials for formation of a contract are absent It is not a full fledged contract

It is a full fledged contract and is binding

Page 6

Section 68
Claim for supply of necessaries to person incapable of contracting Necessaries: Things suited to the conditions of incompetent parties Includes articles required to maintain a particular person in the state and degree in the life in which he is Articles without which an individual cannot reasonable exist

Illustration
A supplies B, lunatic with necessaries suitable to his condition of life. is entitled to be reimbursed from Bs property

Page 7

Section 69
Reimbursement of money paid, in which he is interested Essentials: There must be a person who is bound to make a payment by law. The person paying must himself not be bound to pay. When he is jointly liable to pay, payment by him would not give him the right to recover under this section The payment must be made bonafide for the protection of ones own interest

Illustration
A and B have been fined jointly Rs500 for selling adulterated ghee. A alone pays the amount of fine in good faith, A cannot later claim contribution from B under Section 69. Notice that although B was bound by law to pay and A has paid Bs share in good faith, yet A cannot recover as he himself was bound to make the payment, being jointly liable with B and was not simply interested in making the payment.

Page 8

Section 70
Obligation of a person enjoying benefits of non-gratuitous act Person lawfully does anything for another person Delivers anything to him non-gratuitously Latter is bound to make compensation or restore the thing so done or delivered The thing must be done lawfully

The person for whom the act is done must enjoy the benefit of it.

Illustration
A, a tradesman, leaves goods at Bs house by mistake. B treats the goods his own. He is bound to pay for them

A saves Bs property from fire. A is not entitled to compensation from B, if the circumstances show that he intended to act gratuitously.

Page 9

Section 71 - Responsibility of finder of goods


A person who finds goods belonging to another and takes them into his custody, is subject to the same responsibility as a bailee. The finders position, therefore, has been considered along with bailment

Illustration
H picked up a diamond on the floor of Fs shop and handed it over to F to keep it till the owner appeared True owner could not be searched After the lapse of some weeks, H tendered to F the lawful expenses incurred by him for finding the true owner and an indemnity bond and requested him to return the diamond to him (i.e., H). F refused to do so F must return the diamond to H as he was entitled to retain the goods as against everybody except the true owner (Hollins Vs FowlerS)

Page 10

Section 71 - Responsibility of finder of goods


1. Duties of Finder of Goods:

He must try to find out the real owner of the goods and must not appropriate the property to his own use ( Section 403 IPC ) He must take as much care of the goods as much a man of ordinary prudence would take of his own goods of same bulk, quality and value. (Sec 151 )

2. Rights of finder of Goods:


He is entitled to the possession of the goods till the true owner is found. ( Case : Hollins vs FowlerS) He is entitled to retain this good until he receives the lawful charges or compensation for retaining the goods and for care and preservation thereof. However, he cant sue for such compensation unless a specified reward has been advertised by the owner. He can sell the goods if: The commodity is perishable The owner cannot be found Owner refuses to pay the lawful charges Lawful charges amount to 2/3rd of the value of commodity found

Page 11

Section 72 - delivered by mistake or coercion


Liability of person to whom money is paid, or thing delivered by mistake or under coercion What does it mean A person to whom money has been paid, or anything delivered by mistake or under

Illustration
A and B jointly owe Rs. 1,000 to C. A alone pays the amount to C and B not knowing this fact, pays Rs. 1,000 over again to C. C is bound to repay the amount to B.

Page 12

You might also like