Professional Documents
Culture Documents
■ Qualitative Areas
◆ Reputation
◆ Social Responsibility
◆ Employees
Quantitative Areas
■ Profitability
◆ Net profit margin; ROI; ROE
■ Productivity
◆ Lower costs (% of sales CGS, S&A)
◆ Activity ratios
■ Growth
◆ Increases in sales, assets, net income
■ Competitive Position
◆ Market Share
■ Technological Leadership
■ Shareholder Wealth
◆ EPS; Dividends; Shareholder Value
(stock)
■ Industry specific metrics
Qualitative Areas
■ Employee Relations
■ Social Responsibility
■ Reputation
Related
Diversification
into new
Businesses
Unrelated
Modes of Growth
■ Internal development
■ Acquiring firms/businesses
■ Collaborative arrangements
◆ Strategic Alliances
◆ Joint Ventures
◆ Licensing
Repositioning Strategies
■ Retrenchment
◆ Assets and/or costs
■ Divestiture
■ Spin-offs
Termination Strategies
■ Liquidation
■ Merger
■ Being acquired
Tools
for Formulating and Choosing
Corporate Strategies
1. Portfolio Analysis
The BCG Matrix
Low -20
GE Competitive Position (1. Market Share; 2. Technological
MATRIX Know-How; 3. Product Quality; 4. Service Network;
5. Price Competitiveness; 6. Operating Costs
Industry Attractiveness
Profit
Low Loser
Producer Loser
1. Market growth; 2. market size; 3. Capital requirements;
4. Competitive Intensity
PRODUCT/MARKET EVOLUTION PORTFOLIO MATRIX
Development B1
Growth
Stage B4
of
Industry Shakeout
Maturity/ B2
Saturation
B3
Decline
Competitive Position Strong Average Weak
Market Share; Technological Know-How; Product Quality
Service Network; Price competitiveness; operating costs
Advantages of Portfolio Analyses
■ Encourages top management to evaluate
each business individually; to set
objectives; and consider resources.
■ It stimulates use of external data to
supplement management’s judgment.
■ Its graphic representation makes
interpretation and communication easier.
Limitations of Portfolio Analyses
■ Defining product/market segments isn’t easy.
■ Using standard strategies may miss
opportunities or be impractical.
■ Providing an illusion of scientific rigor masks
the reality that positions are based on
subjective judgments.
■ Determining what makes an industry attractive
isn’t always possible.
More Tools
◆ 2. Past Performance
◆ % increase in sales
◆ Contribution Margin
✦ Sales or profit (gross, operating, net)
◆ Continue to do what doing
4. Matrices
SWOT or TOWS Matrix
SO Strategies
Strengths Opportunities
ST Strategies WO Strategies
WT Strategies
Weaknesses Threats
Matching
Matching Key
Key External
External and
and Internal
Internal Factors
Factors to
to
Formulate
Formulate Alternative
Alternative Strategies
Strategies (Table
(Table 6-2)
6-2)
An example
Financial Strength
Environmental Stability
Example
Example Strategy
Strategy Profiles
Profiles (Figure
(Figure 6-6)
6-6)
Aggressive Profiles
FS FS
( +1, +5)
( +4, +4)
CA IS CA IS
ES ES
A financially strong firm with A firm whose financial strength
major competitive advantages in is a dominating factor in the
a growing industry industry
Example
Example Strategy
Strategy Profiles
Profiles (Figure
(Figure 6-6)
6-6)
Conservative Profiles
FS FS
(-2, +4)
(-5, +2)
CA IS CA IS
ES
ES
A firm that suffers from major
A firm with financial strength; competitive disadvantages in an
the firm has no major industry that has declining sales
competitive advantages
The
The Grand
Grand Strategy
Strategy Matrix
Matrix (Figure
(Figure 6-11)
6-11)
Rapid Market Growth
CA IS CA IS
(+5, -1)
(+1, -2)
ES ES
A firm with major competitive An organization that is competing
advantages in a high-growth industry fairly well in an unstable industry
Example
Example Strategy
Strategy Profiles
Profiles (Figure
(Figure 6-6)
6-6)
Defensive Profiles
FS FS
CA IS CA IS
(-5, -1)
(-1, -5)
ES ES
A firm that has a very weak An financially troubled firm in a very
competitive position in a negative unstable industry
growth, stable industry