Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Eight sets of slides for the Spring 2014. Are available on my web page. Are also posted on the web blackboard for this course under Course Library. May be amended slightly. Course Syllabus. Is posted on my web page and on the web Blackboard for this course under Syllabus. Includes some basic material for those with no background
Assignments. We shall proceed directly though the Syllabus The slides will also take us directly through the Syllabus.
1 Donald J. Weidner
Seller
Listing
Agreement
Interim Contract
Buyer
Closing
Consummation (Closing) of the Contract of Sale is subject to certain conditions, which must be satisfied within a particular period of time, usually involving: a) title; b) physical condition; and c) financing.
Donald J. Weidner
Contract Conditions
Text says conditions are essentially substitutes for information.
About legal title, physical condition, availability of financing
Conditions may also be inserted by the buyer to postpone making a commitment. Conditions range from the extremely general to the extremely specific. Conditions may leave so much open that a contract arguably fails to satisfy the requirement of a writing under the Statute of Frauds. Even if the Statute of Frauds is satisfied, the contract may be too indefinite to support an award of specific performance.
3 Donald J. Weidner
Illusory Contracts Since conditions will characteristically be phrased in general terms, and their fulfillment left to the exclusive control of one of the parties, there is the added question of illusoriness or mutuality of obligation. Generally, the problem is small, for the concept of good faith goes far toward preventing reneging parties from using a financing, title or other condition as an excuse for nonperformance.
4 Donald J. Weidner
Illusory Contracts (contd) On the excuse issue, the text says: In such cases the court will examine the motive of the party relying on the condition. If a written contract gives me a right, must I show that I am pure of heart before I may enforce it? Not everyone thinks so. Courts split on their role in applying the good faith requirement As we shall see in more detail Gap filler versus mandatory rule
5 Donald J. Weidner
Homler v. Malas,
(Text p. 95)
Seller sought to specifically enforce a buyers promise to purchase a single-family residence. Contract, on a standard form, had a subject to financing clause that conditioned Buyers performance.
on Buyers obtaining a loan (ability to obtain had been deleted). For 80% of the purchase price. Repayable monthly over a term of no less than 30 years. However, there was no mention of: Interest rate (left blank). The amount of monthly payment (left blank). Amortization terms.
6 Donald J. Weidner
Homler v. Malas (contd) Court said: it is not as if the contract had specified interest at the current prevailing rate. The contract assumed a search for third-party financing. Why not use the concept of good faith as a gap filler? That is, the concept of good faith would fill the interest rate gap by implying into the contract that interest would be at the current prevailing rate Stated differently, the default rule (the rule that would apply unless the parties specified a different rule) would be that the unspecified interest rate is the current prevailing rate
8 Donald J. Weidner
Does the strikeout suggest a different argument? Mutuality of obligation is a separate issue from vague and indefinite [and apparently, in the eyes of the court, an issue that was not raised]
Could Buyer have enforced the contract against Seller? If not, did the contract merely give Option to Buyer?
9 Donald J. Weidner
Donald J. Weidner
Liuzza v. Panzer
(Text p. 98)
Contract to sell and to buy for $37,500. Buyers obligation was conditioned upon the ability of the [Buyer] to borrow $30,000.00 on the property at an interest rate not to exceed 9%. Buyer applied to an S & L for a $30,000 loan and was rejected because the appraisal was too low. S & L appraisal was $32,150. S & L would only lend 80% of the appraised value (which was less than the $30,000 loan amount mentioned in the contract as a condition). Can the Buyer walk away from the deal at this point?
Before refusing to close, what more, if anything, must Buyer do to avoid breaching the Buyers implied obligation to act in good faith?
11 Donald J. Weidner
Kovarik v. Vesely
(Text p. 99)
Contract provided for Buyers obligation to buy for $11,000. Buyers were to pay $4,000 down, with the balance to be financed through a $7,000 purchase-money mortgage from the Fort Atkinson S & L. Fort Atkinson S & L rejected the Buyers. Seller offered to provide $7,000 financing on the same terms that Buyers requested from Fort Atkinson. Buyers refused the offer of Seller financing Seller sued to specifically enforce the contract. Did the court correctly conclude that good faith required the Buyer to accept the Sellers offer of seller financing?
12 Donald J. Weidner
The courts reasoning: the loan application . . . is a separate writing which is to be construed together with the original contract of the parties, and together they constitute a sufficient memorandum to satisfy [the Statute of Frauds].
Is there one transaction or two?
14 Donald J. Weidner
15
Donald J. Weidner
2. Replacement Cost
19
Donald J. Weidner
Applying this rough method, a comparable property with only $600,000 of Gross Rent receipts would therefore have a $3,600,000 value (six times gross rent receipts) ($600,000 X 6 = $3,600,000)
21
Donald J. Weidner
Capitalizing Value of Net Operating Income Begin by considering the net cash flow on a property you currently own and have financed. Net cash flow is simply the sum of all cash receipts from operations minus all cash spent (ignoring any capital improvements), including debt service. As we shall discuss more fully, to derive taxable income or loss from net cash flow, simply subtract the depreciation deduction and add back in amount paid to amortize debt.
22 Donald J. Weidner
NCF versus NOI Net Cash Flow=Rent ReceiptsReal Estate TaxesMaintenance Insurance(Principal + Interest) Now assume you are a buyer valuing a property and you dont yet know how you will finance your acquisition. You might look at its net operating income. Net Operating Income is NCF apart from the current owners debt service (principal and interest). NOI = Rent Receipts Real Estate Taxes Maintenance Insurance
23 Donald J. Weidner
is how much an investor will pay for the right to receive $1,000 per year
if the investor will insist on an 8% return on his or her investment. In this example,
is $12,500
If I expects a 12% cash return [stated in decimals]
The price
How Much Will An Investor Pay for a Building that has a $150,000 Net Cash Flow?
A. 1) 2) If I expects an 8% cash return [stated in B. fractions]
The price
1)
Divide each side of the equation by 8/100 ( x 8/100) x 100/8 = 150,000 x 100/8 = $1,875,000
24
Donald J. Weidner
Capitalizing Value of NOI Another way of looking at Net Operating Income is as the amount of cash flow that is available to service your acquisition debt. How much would you pay for an annual NOI of a certain amount. Assume NOI of $300,000 and a 5% Cap Rate NOI of $300,000 = $6,000,000 .05
25 Donald J. Weidner
Capitalizing Value of NOI Most of us are uncomfortable dividing by decimals. The following statement avoids dividing by decimals. Again, NOI is $300,000 and the Cap Rate is 5. NOI x 100 = Value Cap. Rate 300,000 X 100 = $6,000,000 5
26
Donald J. Weidner
28
Donald J. Weidner
How much would you pay to purchase a 10-year position as landlord the right to receive $1,000 yr. rent for 10 years?
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 .833 x $1,000 = 833 .694 x $1,000 = 694 .579 .482 .402 .335 .279 .233 .194 .162 x $1,000 = 162 $4,193
HYPO: What is the total present value of the right to receive $1,000 in cash at the end of each of the next ten years? Assume the investor requires a 20% rate of return. Because the 10, $1,000 payments are spread over the next 10 years, their total present value is the sum of the present value of each of the future payments. That Is:
29
Donald J. Weidner
Operating
Agreement
BUILDING
LAND
PLAZA
LEASE
HOTEL CP
Consider: since the fee and the building on it were separately owned, the fee could be sold separately. Hence, it is possible to ask: how much would someone pay for the fee.
How would you value the fee? Discount the cash flow?
Having set aside the appraisers determination of value, the court undertook to determine value.
32 Donald J. Weidner
33
Donald J. Weidner
34
Donald J. Weidner
35
Donald J. Weidner
The cost for the benefit of lower debt service: the longer the term, the more interest is paid.
37
Donald J. Weidner
Rate of Interest
The greater the rate of interest, the greater the Debt Service. Example, a 25-year $100,000 home improvement loan. Monthly Debt Service at
4% 6% 8% 10% 17% is $ 528 (2012) is $ 644 is $ 770 is $ 908 is $ 1,436 (1980)
38 Donald J. Weidner
Points
Point is one percent of the face amount of a contract debt. Points can be characterized differently, ex., as interest, as compensation for services, etc. Basic way points can work:
Buyer executes note to Seller for $40,000 (interest, length, amortization terms also specified). Lender purchases note from Seller charging 6 points [$40,000 X 6% = $2,400]). That is, Lender pays only $37,600 for the $40,000 note [$40,000 minus the $2,400]. Buyer still pays interest on full $40,000 face amount of the note.
39 Donald J. Weidner
...
PASSAGE OF TIME
Principal Interest
40 Donald J. Weidner
SELF AMORTIZING
Second Type: Constant Amortization
...
PASSAGE OF TIME
Principal Interest
41 Donald J. Weidner
BALLOON
...
PASSAGE OF TIME
Principal Interest
42 Donald J. Weidner
Fla. Stat. sec. 697.05(2)(a)1 has its own definition of balloon mortgage.
Every mortgage in which the final payment or the principal balance due and payable upon maturity is greater than twice the amount of the regular monthly or periodic payment of the mortgage shall be deemed a balloon mortgage.
43
Donald J. Weidner
With certain exceptions, there shall be printed or clearly stamped on such mortgage a legend in substantially the following form:
THIS IS A BALLOON MORTGAGE AND THE FINAL PRINCIPAL PAYMENT OR THE PRINCIPAL BALANCE DUE UPON MATURITY IS $-----, TOGETHER WITH ACCRUED INTEREST, IF ANY, AND ALL ADVANCEMENTS MADE BY THE MORTGAGEE UNDER THE TERMS OF THIS MORTGAGE.
44 Donald J. Weidner
The statute also has special provisions concerning the case of any balloon mortgage securing the payment of an obligation the rate of interest on which is variable or is to be adjusted or renegotiated periodically, where the principal balance due on maturity cannot be calculated with any certainty. Failure of a mortgagee to comply with these provisions shall automatically extend the maturity date of such mortgage.
45
Donald J. Weidner
Length. Seldom for more than 10 to 15 years. In 1925, the average length for mortgages issued
by life insurance companies was 6 years; by S &Ls was 11 years.
Rate of Interest: Junior mortgages were at higher rates of interest. Amortization Terms: Balloons were common. In the Great Depression: 1 million American families lost their homes to foreclosure between 19301935 (many fewer than in years following 2006).
46 Donald J. Weidner
Americans Living in their Own Homes 1940 41% 1950 53% 1981 65% 2006 69%*
*By 2008, many suggest that federal housing officials trying to raise the homeownership rate as high as possible helped cause the subprime crisis by encouraging loans to high-risk borrowers Many also fault Chariman Alan Greenspans Federal Reserve Board for keeping interest rates too low for too long. Ben Bernanke does not.
48 Donald J. Weidner
1) Adjustable Rate Mortgage (ARM) (a.k.a. Variable Rate Mortgage or VRM) 2) Graduated Payment Mortgage (GPM) 3) Renegotiable Rate Mortgage (RRM) 4) Shared Appreciation Mortgage (SAM) 5) Price Level Adjusted Mortgage (PLAM) 6) Reverse Annuity Mortgage (RAM)
49
Donald J. Weidner
Note: a borrower may not be able to refinance, even if rates have dropped
51 Donald J. Weidner
52
Donald J. Weidner
GRADUATED PAYMENT MORTGAGE (contd) The Growing Equity Mortgage is another form of increasing payment mortgage. Text discusses it as a long term, selfamortizing mortgage under which the borrowers monthly payments increase each year by a predetermined amount, typically 4%.
Apparently, it never goes negative as to interest or principal.
Note: borrow can tailor his or her own growing equity provisions with prepayment privileges.
54
Donald J. Weidner
As initially approved for consumer transactions, the interest rate could be adjusted up or down every 3 to 5 years and could rise or fall as much as 5 percentage points over the entire 30-year life of the mortgage.
55
Donald J. Weidner
1. 2. 3.
4.
5. 6.
The note to the S & L provided: Interest shall be paid monthly. Initial interest rate was 6% per annum. The initial interest rate may be changed from time to time at the S & Ls option. There will be no interest rate change during first 3 years. Borrower will get 4 months written notice before any interest rate change. Borrower has 4 months from receipt of notice of a change to prepay without penalty.
56 Donald J. Weidner
Goebel (contd) Nine years later, Lender declared that the interest rate was being increased and that Borrower had the option to
Pay increased monthly Debt Service, or Increase the length of the loan. [No mention was made of amortization terms/balloons].
Courts said it would construe the ambiguous language in the note against the drafter, especially
when the drafter has much greater bargaining power, and when the drafter supplied its standard form.
57
Donald J. Weidner
Goebel (contd)
As to increasing monthly Debt Service, court said expressio unius controlled: The note contained provisions to increase Debt Service in some situations but did not mention increasing debt service to reflect an increase in interest rate. 1. Note stated that monthly Debt Service could be increased to accommodate future advances; and 2. Note stated that Lender had a right to payment for taxes, insurance and repairs on demand
1. Lower court said this included the right to increase monthly Debt Service.
3. Yet the note fails to make similar provisions for an increase in interest rate
1. Therefore, the promisor could not be required to pay more monthly debt service to satisfy an increase in interest rate.
58 Donald J. Weidner
Goebel (contd) As to increasing the term (the length of the loan), the court focused on the language that all Principal and Interest shall be paid in full within 25 years. 1. Lender argued this clause was intended for its benefit and that it, therefore, could set it aside. 2. The court appears to have begged the conclusion when it said that this clause was for the Borrowers benefit.
And, therefore, Borrower could not be forced to pay debt service for a longer term/
59 Donald J. Weidner
Goebel (contd) What effect could the interest increase provisions have? The court said it was not nullifying the provisions increasing the interest rate because an interest increase would still be collectible: 1. To offset any prior interest rate declines 2. In the event of a prepayment of the mortgage Due on sale clause was enforceable How does this fit with what the court said about a balloon (this method was not used)?
60 Donald J. Weidner
Recall, good faith can be a gap filler to salvage an otherwise indefinite contract Recall, too, that the borrower had the option to prepay without penalty upon an interest rate increase. Indicating that market forces might limit the lender from exacting an increase.
61 Donald J. Weidner
63
Donald J. Weidner
66
Donald J. Weidner
Federal Reserve Policy When the Federal Funds Rate was only 1%, Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan announced that the FOMC would maintain an highly accommodative stance for as long as needed to promote satisfactory economic performance Thus, there was cheap money to help drive up prices Treasury obligations were not paying investors very much Investors turned to mortgaged-backed securities for higher yields than Treasury bills at, they thought, relatively little risk At the same time, Chairman Greenspan believed that the discipline of the markets, rather than regulation, would prevent excessive risk taking.
68 Donald J. Weidner
Gretchen Morgenson, Crisis Looms in Market for Mortgages, New York Times, March 11, 2007.
As of March, 2007, the nations $6.5 trillion mortgage securities market was even larger than the United States treasury market. Already [March 2007], more than two dozen mortgage lenders have failed or closed their doors, and shares of big companies in the mortgage industry have declined significantly. Delinquencies on loans made to less creditworthy borrowers known as subprime mortgages recently reached 12.6 percent. 35% of all mortgage securities issued in 2006 were in the subprime category.
69 Donald J. Weidner
Crisis Looms in Mortgage Market (contd) Subprime Lenders created affordability products, mortgages that
Require little or no down payment Require little or no documentation of a borrowers income Extend terms to 40 or 50 years Begin with low teaser rates that rise later in the life of the loan.
Crisis in Mortgage Market (contd) Securities backed by home mortgages have been traded since the 1970s, but it has been only since 2002 or so that investors, including pension funds, insurance companies, hedge funds and other institutions, have shown such an appetite for them. Wall Street was happy to help refashion mortgages into ubiquitous and frequently traded securities, and now dominates the market. By 2006 Wall Street had 60 percent of the mortgage financing market.
71 Donald J. Weidner
Crisis in Mortgage Market (contd) The big firms buy mortgages from issuers, put thousands of them into pools to spread out the risks and then divide them into slices, known as tranches, based on quality. Then they sell them. Some of the big firms even acquired companies that originate mortgages.
Investors demands for mortgage-backed securities was insatiable The greater the demand, the less the investment banks insisted on quality loans.
72 Donald J. Weidner
Although the specifics vary from deal to deal, repurchase agreements obligate the mortgage originator, under some circumstances, to buy back a troubled loan sold to a bank or investor. That obligation sometimes kicks in if the borrower fails to make payments on the loan within the first few months or if there was fraud involved in obtaining the original mortgage. Billions in mortgages are covered by repurchase agreements. However, many originators say that they cannot afford to buy back the loans or they are seeking bankruptcy protection. Many loans went to straw borrowers, people who obtain the loan for another home buyer.
In some cases, brokers wrote contracts through straw men
73 Donald J. Weidner
Rating Agencies
Credit rating agencies are supposed to assess risk of investment securitieshowever, the agencies are paid by the issuer of the security. The rating agencies gave the mortgaged-backed securities a AAA rating, which suggested they were as safe as Treasury Obligations. The projections they made about loan performance assumed a low foreclosure rate
That data focused only on recent history and thus suggested a foreclosure rate of perhaps only 2% It didnt include the newer, more risky mortgages Nor did it anticipate falling real estate prices
74 Donald J. Weidner
Floyd Norris, Being Kept in the Dark on Wall Street. The New York Times, November 2, 2007.
Securitization was extremely profitable for investment banks, and only they seemed to understand what was going on. The products they sold (sometimes labeled CDOs [collateralized debt obligations]) could be valued according to models, which made for nice, consistent profit reports for the people who bought them.
75 Donald J. Weidner
No one seemed to be bothered by the lack of public information on just what was in some of these products. If Moodys, Standard & Poors or Fitch said a weird security deserved an AAA, that was enough. And then they blew up. Now we are learning that the investment banks did not know what was going on either, and they ended up with huge pools of securities whose values are, at best, uncertain.
76 Donald J. Weidner
The Rating Agencies (contd) Rating agency downgrades do not destroy markets for corporate bonds, simply because enough information is disseminated that other analysts can reach their own conclusions. But the securitization markets collapsed when it became clear the rating agencies had been overly optimistic.
Some suggest that information shared with rating agencies should be shared with the entire market.
77 Donald J. Weidner
The Rating Agencies (contd) The SEC is investigating the rating agencies to see if their ratings complied with their own published standards. Neither one of two plausible scenarios, knaves or fools, is pretty: It is hard to know which conclusion would be worse. [1] If the agencies violated their own policies, they will be vilified for the conflicts of interest inherent in their being paid by the issuers of the securities. [2] If they did not, they will be derided as fools who could not see how risky the securities clearly were. (In hindsight, of course.)
78 Donald J. Weidner
The collapse of securitization has made credit hard to obtain for many, and a change in the Fed funds rate will not offset that. [I]t has become very difficult to get a home mortgage without some kind of government-backed guarantee.
79
Donald J. Weidner
But the tranches were being pooled to make them appear to be less risky
And made to appear even less risky with credit default swaps (insurance against defaults)
80 Donald J. Weidner
People began to default on their mortgages soon after taking them out. By late 2006, housing prices started going down. As defaults started, more houses came on the market, prices went further down.
82 Donald J. Weidner
2008 2,350,000 2009 2,920,000 2010 - 3,500,000 2011 - 3,580,000 2012 2,100,000
Securitisation is the process that transforms mortgages, credit-card receivables and other financial assets into marketable securities
Brought huge gains Also brought costs that are only now becoming clear.
Thanks largely to securitisation, global privatedebt securities are now far bigger than stockmarkets.
85
Donald J. Weidner
Benefits of securitization:
1. Global lenders use it to manage their balance sheets, since selling loans frees up capital for new businesses or for return to shareholders. 2. Small regional banks no longer need to place all their bets on local housing marketsthey can offload credits to far-away investors such as insurers or hedge funds. 3. Reduces borrowing costs for consumers and businesses.
86 Donald J. Weidner
4. One systemic gain was said to be: Subjecting bank loans to valuation by capital markets encourages the efficient use of capital. --However, the capital markets were not making their own valuations (Allan Greenspan admits that the Fed got it wrong on this point). 5. Broadens the distribution of credit risk. However, there are three cracks in the new model: 1. A high level of complexity and confusion. 2. Fragmentation of responsibility warped incentives. 3. Regulations came to be gamed.
87 Donald J. Weidner
1. Problem # 1: complexity: financiers did not fully understand what they were trading.
Schwarcz says some contracts are so convoluted that it would be impractical for investors to try to understand them Skel and Partnoy concluded that CDOs are being used to transform existing debt instruments that are accurately priced into new ones that are overvalued.
In mortgage securitisation, the lender is supplanted by --the broker --the loan originator --the servicer (who collects payments) --the arranger --the rating agencies --the mortgage-bond insurers -- the investor By January of 2008, there was widespread concern over the stability of the bond insurers.
89 Donald J. Weidner
Looking forward: Investors need to know who is holding what and how it should be valued. There will be calls for greater standardization of structured products. Regulators will want to see the interests of rating agencies aligned more closely with investors, and to ensure that they are quicker and more thorough in reviewing past ratings. [Securities Rating Agency] is one of the few businesses where the appraiser is paid by the seller, not the buyer.
92 Donald J. Weidner
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac: End of Illusions, The Economist, July 19, 2008, p. 79.
Fannie and Freddie were set up to provide liquidity for the housing market by buying mortgages from the banks. They repackaged these loans and used them as collateral for bonds called mortgage-backed securities; they guaranteed buyers of those securities against default.
93 Donald J. Weidner
The belief in the implicit government guarantee of the obligations of Fannie and Freddie: 1. Permitted them to borrow cheaply. 1.They engaged in a carry tradethey earned more on the mortgages they bought than they paid for the money they raised. 2. Allowed them to operate with tiny amounts of capital and they became extremely leveraged (geared): 65 to 1! 1.$5 trillion of debt and guarantees! Their core portfolio had been fine, with an average Loan/Value ratio of 68% at the end of 2007: in other words, they could survive a 30% fall in house prices.
94 Donald J. Weidner
However, in the late 1990s, they moved into another area: buying the mortgagebacked securities that others had issued.
Fannie and Freddie were operating as hedge funds. Again, this was a version of the carry trade; they used their cheap debt financing to buy higher-yielding assets. Fannies outside portfolio grew to $127 billion by the end of 2007.
Leaving them exposed to the subprime assets they were supposed to avoid.
95 Donald J. Weidner
TARP (contd) After much criticism, the announced plan shifted from the core mission of buying distressed mortgage assets and
toward purchasing ownership stakes in banks
England led the way with this solution, suggesting that the federal government may put $250 billion in banks in return for shares. With some restraints on executive compensation.
and toward bailouts of Fannie and Freddie, automotive companies (Chrysler, GM) and AIG (which had gone down because of its credit default swaps)
97 Donald J. Weidner
The Federal Reserve Response In 2008, the Federal Reserve cut the discount rate, the rate on loans to banks, to near zero. The Fed also initiated a program of quantitative easing, or QE, purchasing assets, such as treasuries and mortgage-backed securities, thus driving down the yield on that type of asset.
Starting at $600 billion and increasing to $1.8 trillion
98 Donald J. Weidner
Federal Reserve Wants to Inflate Asset Prices (and create a wealth effect)
Easier financial conditions will promote economic growth. For example, lower mortgage rates will make housing more affordable and allow more homeowners to refinance. Lower corporate bond rates will encourage investment. And higher stock prices will boost consumer wealth and help increase confidence, which can also spur spending. Increased spending will lead to higher incomes and profits that, in a virtuous circle, will further support economic expansion. Ben Bernanke November 5, 2010
99 Donald J. Weidner
The Federal Reserve Response On November 3, 2010, the Federal Reserve announced QE 2, a second round of quantitative easing, during which it would purchase an additional $600 billion in long-term treasury obligations over the following eight months. At the same time indicating it would continue to hold the federal funds rate at close to zero. Critics expressed concerns about inflation and about asset bubbles.
100 Donald J. Weidner
Tending to further reduce mortgage interest rates and inflate asset prices
102
Donald J. Weidner
The Taper
In December 2013, the Fed announced that it would begin to reduce (taper) its monthly purchases by $10 billion a month
$5 billion less a month for mortgage-backed securities and $5 billion less a month for treasury obligations
At the same time it said that it would continue to hold short-term interest rates near zero for the foreseeable future.
In January 2014, it said it would do so well past a 6.5% unemployment rate
105 Donald J. Weidner
The essence of securitization is transforming a future income stream into a lump sum today. The ECB is a fan, as are global banking regulators who last month watered down rules that threatened to stifle securitization. Economic growth and investors desperate for yield are stimulating supply, especially outside the area of residential mortgages. Policy makers want to get more credit flowing in the economy, particularly in Europe.
106 Donald J. Weidner