This document discusses the history and development of IBM from the 1970s onwards. It covers IBM's dominance in the mainframe computer market during this period and its declining market share as new types of computers like minicomputers, PCs and workstations emerged. It analyzes IBM's business strategies, organizational restructurings in the late 1980s and early 1990s in response to these changes, and its external environment and competitors who threatened its leadership position. The conclusion recommends that IBM focus on innovation, partnerships, and appealing to younger customers to reposition itself in the new technological landscape.
This document discusses the history and development of IBM from the 1970s onwards. It covers IBM's dominance in the mainframe computer market during this period and its declining market share as new types of computers like minicomputers, PCs and workstations emerged. It analyzes IBM's business strategies, organizational restructurings in the late 1980s and early 1990s in response to these changes, and its external environment and competitors who threatened its leadership position. The conclusion recommends that IBM focus on innovation, partnerships, and appealing to younger customers to reposition itself in the new technological landscape.
This document discusses the history and development of IBM from the 1970s onwards. It covers IBM's dominance in the mainframe computer market during this period and its declining market share as new types of computers like minicomputers, PCs and workstations emerged. It analyzes IBM's business strategies, organizational restructurings in the late 1980s and early 1990s in response to these changes, and its external environment and competitors who threatened its leadership position. The conclusion recommends that IBM focus on innovation, partnerships, and appealing to younger customers to reposition itself in the new technological landscape.
Akers reorganized IBM into 7 Divisions based on Product market segments
Managers of each division given autonomy and responsibility
Single sale force continued
1991 Restructuring Reorganization to dilute contention system of IBM
Downsizing of organization started
PC business was placed in separate operating unit and separate Sales for PCs
Decentralization of decision making authority
Reduced role of IBM corporate HQ
Effect of 1991 reorganization Akers divided IBM into 13 separate divisions
9 for main product lines 4 for marketing and service operations
Each unit to work independent of each other
Single sale force continued
1991: loss of $2.8b ( first time in IBM history)
1992: loss of $ 5b 1993: New Management & New Plans
Louis Gerstner took over as CEO
He was an outsider to IBM
He hired outsiders for top post like CFO, VP, VP of corporate marketing etc
Thrust on reengineering
11 person corporate executive committee 11 task forces to analyze IBMs main processes Restructuring of relationships between corporate centre and the divisions: No decentralization
Traditional strategy of providing full line of hardware and software followed
Reduced workforce heavily from 4.05 lac to 2.5 lac
26 Sept 1993 Gerstners 4 goals
To get the company to right size To spend more time with customers To determine the strategic issues by process reengineering To build employee morale in the face of huge layoffs
IBM announced a loss of $ 46m for third quarter compared to $ 40m loss in 1992 Domination of the global market in computers
Highly successful System360 and System370 mainframe series
The mainframe became the industry standard that competitors tried to match
High-priced lease strategy, backed by excellent customer service
Strong bonding with customers Successful alliances and joint ventures with computer & software companies such as Intel and Microsoft to achieve product innovation and differentiation and enter new markets
Contention system (Project teams & committees to develop and debate the costs and benefits of each project: successful projects)
Steady cash flow
Focus on service, combined with a successful sales force
Focus on Research & Development: High budget
Successful Product group structure (restructuring during 1992): Divisions organized around products instead of functions, each group having control over its manufacturing and marketing No clear vision and mission statement
The IBM culture was relaxed and supremely confident of its abilities and resources
Culture was slow and blinkered
Under estimated its competitors greatly
mainframes were king corporate mindset
Too much focus mainframe market
big machines meant big revenues The bigger the better
High cost and high-priced products
Used to high profit margins led to choking when low- cost competitors appeared
Unable to recognize importance of patents
Easy cloning At lower cost Sometimes, with even better quality
massive organization size
High costs in the value chain
Blind to threats emerging from the emergence of new kinds of computer technology
Overly bureaucratic and centralized approach in decision-making
Complexity of Contention system
Inordinate delays in Decision Making Slow response to developing market segments Laggard in launching new products Changes in technology
Emergence of new kinds of computers
Minicomputers PCs Workstations Software and services Systems integration & Outsourcing
Cheaper and faster technological breakthroughs as compared to mainframe computers
Software design and providing customer service, specifically for the design of general operating language and software applications
Data outsourcing and systems integration also had revenue-generating potential
Indirect control of software market by purchasing large chunk of Microsoft stock at low price:
Countless opportunities to differentiate and innovate products
If we try to look back, IBMs success was itself the result of moving quickly and decisively to exploit the opportunities of new technology: the punch card machine, the transistor, and the integrated circuit.
Their brand image is synonymous with big and old they need to create products appealing to a younger generation and reposition their company.
IBM needs to maintain a competitive edge in the marketplace and innovation is key and working with IT-related companies to create new products in the ever changing market; use patents to generate revenue.
High individual consumption power
Increased globalization .
Potential competitors
New Computer systems and allied products
Many market segments but common sales force
Rapid reduction in hardware due to technological changes
Mainframe market saturation
Customers have low switching costs
Clone manufacturers
local or foreign aggressive strategies for cost leadership product differentiation low-price alternatives to the IBM mainframe quality support low-cost service
High turn over rate of technology
Mainframes becoming obsolete and the product life cycle shortening, as new technological inventions are making their way
2-27 The Organisation
External analysis stages Macro-environment Broad trends shaping the national and international environment political, economic, social and technological trends (i.e. PESTEL factors, key drivers ) Micro-environment operating environment or industry sector in which the firm competes range of issues such as suppliers, customers, competitive intensity, threat of new entry and of substitute products arising (i.e. the five-forces analysis) Competitor analysis To understand the rival offers from other firms seeking to serve the same customers To out manoeuvre rivals with innovation and competitive moves. Market analysis To evaluate the current needs of todays customers To understand the emerging needs of tomorrows customers so new products can be anticipated To have different strategy in different market segments.
IBM Social Political Technological Environmental Economic Legal PESTEL Analysis for Macro environment factors Political factors:
There were no significant/strict regulations governing the activities within the computer industry.
Companies in the computer industry should also value the protection of their patents. Patent rights can help eliminate threat from clone manufacturers and similar kinds of competitors and thus protect a companys market share and position.
Economic factors Since 1970, several US industries have declined due to the entry of low-cost Japanese competitors. These Japanese companies had great technical capabilities that can match or even exceed US products, thus posing a major threat to IBMs domination of the global market
Steadily falling price of integrated circuits is shortening the lifespan of every computer technology, especially the mainframes. This plunging of costs is making computer technology innovation more feasible for the computer industry players.
Social factors:
A great number of employees were laid off. This may have produced a bad image of IBM to the workers who were promised a stable employment.
IBM lost quite a great number of customers, especially when it decided to end its leasing system. This evidently produced a negative effect to the company on the form of significant revenue declines
IBMs customers were becoming price conscious. Since IBM lagged behind technological breakthroughs, old and new customers were starting to look away from them.
Technological factors:
The technological breakthroughs as manifested by the minicomputers, PCs, workstations, microprocessors, and software brought numerous opportunities and only a single significant threat: the fast rate of obsolescence.
IBM required to create a mindset that in order to grab these opportunities, gain competitive advantage and thus be successful, speed is required. A company must act quickly and decisively to exploit the opportunities brought about by technological change.
Environmental factors:
The rapid obsolescence of computer technology posed a threat to the environment as technological wastes in the form of obsolete/useless/broken computers and component parts making their way to disposal areas.
Harmful chemicals were used to make these tech products and if these were not disposed of properly, it may harm not only nature but also the people.
Legal Factors:
Laws and regulations for cross-country operations and labour laws are some of the laws that IBM may have to comply with.
There may be laws specific to the manufacture and distribution of computer technology; which requires compliance
Intensity of Rivalry Bargaining Power of Suppliers Bargaining Power of Buyers Threat of Substitutes The Threat of Entry Five Forces Analysis for Micro environment factors Technology plays a big role in the computer industry that IBM belongs
Because of the rapid growth of technology, costs accompanying such growth are continually increasing
The threat of new entrants is low because of several factors
One factor is the cost of research and development which is enormous Adapting to the latest technology to survive the industry is also costly Building and maintenance of plants IBM outsourced and bought the inputs from other companies to make its PC
Intel supplied the microchip that was the heart of personal computers Microsoft delivered the programming language and software applications for the new IBM machine
Thus, power of suppliers is assessed to be high on major suppliers
Thus, the overall power of both major and minor supplier is assessed to be medium.
Customer demand drove the prices of IBMs products down to cope with the existing and unavoidable price competition
Switching costs of buyers are also becoming low, as there are many product choices for the buyers
Consumers began to feel more comfortable about buying clones from companies that promised quality support and service at low costs
Thus, bargaining power of buyers is assessed to be high.
Competition was increasing from companies that were trying to find ways to attract IBMs customers
Competitors began selling cheaper and high performing IBM compatible central processing units that posed a threat to the company
The end of the leasing program also led to increased competition from independent computer leasing companies that would buy older mainframes and then sell the older processors at a price that was frequently only 10% of the cost of IBMs newest machine
These companies were also said to dismantle mainframes to make smaller computers
Entry of Japanese competitors posed a threat to IBM because they had the technical
capability to build a powerful computer that matched IBMs mainframe system
Customers began buying clones from competing companies who promised quality similar to IBM.
IBM was also experiencing an increase on low-cost competitions on its outsourcing services business.
In the 1990s, IBM faced tough competition from Toshiba and Apple regarding personal computers
It was also in 1990s that severe competition existed in terms of workstations. Major competitors at that time were DEC, Apollo, Sun, and HP
Clearly, in all developed and developing segments of the computer market, IBM was facing stiff competition.
There are already new products that are much more attractive to the consumers aside from the mainframes and other products that IBM produces
There was a threat on new technologies being developed to outperform the products of IBM. An example was the introduction of Minicomputers which acted as a substitute to some IBM mainframe applications
Even though IBM was successful with its PC division, clones were being made which reduced IBMs sales. New and much improved products are also emerging in the market that has considerably being welcomed with open arms by the consumers posing a high threat of substitute to IBMs products. 1. Determine each competitors probable reaction to the industry & environmental changes
2. Anticipate the response of each competitor to the likely strategic moves by the firm
3. Develop a profile of the nature & success of the possible strategic changes each competitor might undertake 1. Future goals of competitors
2. Its current strategy
3. The key assumptions it makes about itself & about the industry
4. Its capacity in terms of Strengths & Weaknessess STRATEGIC ADVANTAGE
ORGANISATIONAL CAPABILITIES
COMPETENCIES
SYNERGISTIC EFFECTS
STRENGTHS & WEAKNESS
ORGANISATIONAL ORGANISATIONAL RESOURCES BEHAVIOUR FINANCIAL CAPABILITY FACTORS MARKETING CAPABILITY FACTORS OPERTAIONS CAPABILITY FACTORS PERSONNEL CAPABILITY FACTORS INFORMATION CAPABILITY FACTORS GENERAL MANAGENT CAPABILTY FACTORS Well established giant organization
1. CHANGES IN TOP MANAGEMENT 2. INITIAL CREDIBILITY BUILDING ACTIONS 3. NEUTRALIZING EXTERNAL PRESSURES 4. INITIAL CONTROL 5. INDENTIFYING QUICK PAY OFF ACTIVITIES 6. QUICK COST REDUCTION 7. REVENUE GENERATION 8. DOWNSIZING OF WORKFORCE 9. MOBILISATION OF THE ORGANISATION 10. BETTER INTERNAL COORDINATION
1. EXPANSION STRATEGIES
a) Expansion through integration b) Expansion through diversification c) Expansion through cooperation d) Expansion through internationalization
2. RETRENCHMENT STRATEGIES
a) Expansion through Integration
a) BETTER CONTROL OVER VALUE CHAIN MITIGATING BUYERS & SUPPLIERS POWER
b) BETTER AND EFFICIENT UTILIZATION OF RESOURCES
c) REDUCTION IN MUTUAL CONFLICTS
a) TO MINIMISE RISKS
b) TO CAPITALISE ON ORGANISATIONAL STRENGTHS
c) TO GROW IF GROWTH IN EXISTING BUSINESS IS BLOCKED 3- GENERIC STRATEGY
OVERALL COST LEADERSHIP
PRICE OF THE PRODUCT IS A VITAL FACTOR BRANDED PRODUCTS VERY COSTLY
DIFFERENTIATION
MARKET TOO LARGE TO BE CATERED TO BY A FEW FIRMS MAKING/ OFFERING A STANDARDISED PRODUCT
CUSTOMER NEEDS TOO DIVERSIFIED TO BE SATISFIED BY A STANDARDISED PRODUCT BRAND LOYALTY POSSIBLE TO GENERATE & SUSTAIN AMPLE SCOPE FOR INCREASING SALES ON THE BASIS OF DIFFERENTIATED FEATURES & PREMIUM PRICING
FOCUS
EXPENSIVE FOR COMPETITORS TO FOCUS ON TARGET CUSTOMERS OF THE ORGANIZATION
Gerstners Reengineering the corporation
Identify and analyze each of the core business processes Manufacturing Marketing R&D etc
Constitution of 11- member corporate executive committee to spearhead reengineering efforts
11- task forces formed to analyze IBMs main processes
Vertical integration between corporate center and the divisions
Core traditional strategy of providing customers with a full line of hardware and software products and services
Downsizing the workforce
Setting of goals To get the company to right size To spend more time with customers To determine the strategic issues by process reengineering To build employee morale in the face of huge layoffs
IBM, should keep its position in the market as world's largest information technology company
IBM should expand into new markets with promising growth.
IBM has the advantage of being top brand by rapidly expanding into world markets all the while developing new products, services, and solutions to better help its wide variety of customers from small to large
To improve and maintain its corporate image, IBM needs to find new and better ways to be philanthropic company worldwide
Improving job satisfaction, communities, and living standards IBM can also offer scholarships, educational assistance, and internships to improve educational system, which enable them to have quality staff, partners, customer, and suppliers. Invest heavily on research and development
Researching on how to incorporate the internet to IBMs product would be a worthwhile investment
Partner with suppliers
Collaboration with suppliers will increase business flexibility and executive level business decision support IBM should even have good relations to its suppliers since parts supplied by them are essential for IBMs products
Keep consistent tracking of market changes and adapt promptly and efficiently
Analysis of macro and micro level environmental factors on IBM strategy concludes that IBM has strong competitors in hardware industry like Dell or Hp but IBM can work more powerful in software industry with few strong competitors like Microsoft
IBM accuracy of understanding the demand for software and services skills worldwide is growing. Therefore, the computer technology industry still has high market growth rate.
Although the external factors have impacted on computer technology industry, IBM still exit on the market as they have strong financial capacity, knowledgeable and competent management and experience.