The decision making process of the consumer Consumer Behavior Preference set
Constraints Optimal decision
Assumptions Completeness: ability to express rational decision when confronted with a choice between two goods/baskets of goods: I prefer A to B; B to A; am indifferent between A & B
Assumptions Transitivity or consistence: If a consumer prefers A to B and B to C, he will prefer A to C
Non satiation: a rational consumer prefers more of a good to less of a good
Utility and Optimization Utility (Jeremy Bentham): - reflects a rank ordering of preferences. - is a magnitude indicating the direction of preferences Constraints: income and prices Optimization: - Cardinal Approach and Ordinal Approach Optimization The Cardinal Approach Utility is cardinally measurable and the objective is to maximize utility The Law of Diminishing Marginal Utility Optimization Rule 1: When only one good is consumed and is available for free, consume till MU x = 0 Optimization Optimization Rule 2: When only one good is consumed and is available for a price: Consume till MU x = Price x
Optimization Rule 3:When more than one good is consumed and the prices of goods vary: Consume till MU x /P x = MU y /P y = MU z /P z Deriving the demand curve: cardinal approach Marginal utility Schedule Units of X MU of X 1. 10 utils 2 8 3 5 4 3 5 0 Combinations of quantity & Price
Price of X Units of X Rs.10 1 Rs.8 2 Rs.4 3 Cardinal approach, criticism The coordinal approach suffers from the criticism that utility being subjective, it can not therefore be measured objectively. It is nearly impossible for an average consumer to draw his utility schedules for different commodities and then optimize, rather maximize his total utility by equating the marginal utility of a rupees worth in all directions.
Cardinal approach, criticism Being subjective utility varies from person to person and even for the same person. Even experts can not derive utility schedules for different products Hence it is not possible to arrive at marginal utilities of different goods and then equate the same to arrive at maximum total utility. Ordinal Approach The ordinal utility analysis is also known as indifference curve approach to utility maximization An indifference curve is the locus of infinite combinations of two commodities or bundles of commodities which yield the same total utility to the consumer
Preference Set- Indifference Curves Indifference Curve: Combination of goods that yield the same level of satisfaction. Properties of Indifference curves: - Slope downward - Convex to the origin - Non intersecting Shapes of Indifference curves
MRS decreasing MRS Constant=1 One fixed proportion Normal substitutes perfect substitutes Complements Rate of commodity substitution Since an indifference curve is convex to the origin, movements away from origin on X-axis yield declining marginal rate of commodity substitution This happens because of additions to the stock of commodity represented on X-axis and decreases in the stock of commodity represented on Y-axis. Total utility on an IC curve can remain constant only when the absolute value of the RCS diminishes as we move away from origin Opportunity Set Defined by Budget Constraint. 6x + 3y = 60 Given P x = 6 and P y = 3 Graphically,
-P x /P y is the Slope 10 Y
20 X Consumers Equilibrium- The Optimal Combination e x y At e slope of the budget line is equal to the slope of the Indifference curve. Consumers Equilibrium Slope of the budget line: - P x /P y
Slope of Indifference curve: MUx/MUy
Equilibrium : MUx/MUy = P x /P y or MUx/P x = MUy/P y