Answers are: OC is Orange County, Google M&A boss:jack
Her notes to outsiders were: Vorbis-VP8, webM, Motorola semiconductor firm,,and dozens more seeing our trade secretsto destroy paper trail. See last slides: Dr.Tim Terriberry, was Vorbis coding. Had moved to Mozilla new position 2010. Tim Designed old VP-3,4,5,6,7,8: none worked. Unitl our codec & her notes explaining how. to make VP8 work.
All notes have violators of our trade secret s: Google stealth recipients .
Mozilla would be sued as recipient company Tim works for, after leaving dozen years with XIPH/Vorbis.
Tim TerriberryVorbis, codes audio all vp4,5,-vp8 didnt work 7/2010. see:treecoder from our lawyer & patent page 1;Note: Google revises history here. Treecoder.h/ treecoder.c, etc are direct from our patent lawyer Recklessness Standard, planned Google if caught with patent theft. ------------- Engineers: we know they are listed on amended oct 2010 On2 VP4 pending pp, now granted with our inventions. Engrs are publically listed on webM with Tim /Vorbis on 2010 Oct - 2013 webM coding.
----- If we are designing product (they were: VP8 for youtube, freecompetition to H.264: webM, Songbird, Android, music storage lockers 2011,google TV, Music,tunes, --file our own Patent.
Its common for G to allege Swearing Behind, 102b, bully Inventions with: Claims Construction issue, Invoke Interference.
Google would get caught if VSLs engineers or pro bono Dr.Oguz met the video compression, obsolete technology engineers from Google all of 2010. None of these names are employees of Google April 2010- December 16, 2010, while Google sought documents, claim charts for H.264 infringement, Google hired Tim Terriberry, PhD, worked with On2 Technology from XIPH.org, open source group for audio. See webM all grown from VSL UBER patents, codec & secrets.
1.Talk to their engineers find out about products. And find out about whats going on.
Why not write that in On2 files? Or leave on a Google engineer or patent lawyer desk?
Why glue a post- it note to VSLs trade secrets. .. Design around?. Recklessness std is Googles planned Defense for getting caught stealing., in case they were caught.
Planned early.
Discourge engrs- She doesnt want them to get to know us, ALL the planned engrs meetings were stalled. We have emails from Jack: were scrambling trying to find time to meet..
same guys owned On2 Technology, VP8 that was mocked : diary of x264 developer may 19, 2010. VP8 is a turkey. Google Diary File our own pat. They asked our Lawyers to Create what we Did not have: CLAIM CHARTS H.264 v VSL
Google filed 48 new applications for same inventions as VSLs. All granted in 18 months by PTO.
102b Swearing Behind was her Idea of invalidating Us, but she could Not, we have no Prior art. Asks: have we, (google) Filed patent on Something like us? No is the answer. They havent. On2 Didnt have anything Like our inventions VSLs slice, partition, Reduction of data By encoding and Transmitting Losslessimpossible But true. VSL is Data Transmission.
\ Try to DESTROY EMAIL meant for Illegal recipients who Are named by Google As receiving, against NDA, without VSL Knowledge, our own Secrets.
Had we Wanted outsiders to Learn our multi-billion dollar-secrets we would have met with them under privilege of NDA.
ask for OC ( Outside Counsel ) opinion
pool is H.264 Standards. We were invited to join 7/2004 when it was launched. H.264. And 2011 with our China pat. MPEG-LA had no patent for Slice & partition in Pool when launched using ours.
Google knew that H.264 Infringed our Patents. Today: Google has Licensed in a Settlement to MPEG-LA: our VSL Inventions. Hidden in a sealed agmt between Google & MPEG-LA: as technique.
Dont know what GP- is, rating Review or 354 31773 Must research
But GP is name for Motorola semiconductor Plants mentioned On another Margin Note: yellow post-it.
1789 is another
Defense. It was
Used in England in an infringement Case.
We dont know Who outsider harvey MPEG Guy is, but It is treble damages when Google & Harvey are found Sharing VSL trade Secrets. AAC, MPEG4 HEAAC V.1 MUSIC FOLKS
ANOTHER PERSON
WHO SHOULD NOT HAVE OUR TRADE SECRETS! IF WE WANTED THEM TO, WE WOULD HAVE MET THEM WITHOUT GOOGLE.
DEPOSITION RECIPIENTS REGARDLESS IF LEGAL OR ILLEGAL. INFORMATION EXISTS REGARDING INTENTION AND WHAT WAS DISCUSSED, AND DESTROYED PAPER TRAIL basis of new revenue stream: ads MUSIC play video within player! thats us.
SEE PLANS ON OTHER NOTES.
Shiva is Project Manager
YouTube Videos and Advertising.
Adsense is the big money maker For Google.
Our Data Transmission Increased Googles Revenue stream
Were a fast, and a better prediction. Zurich is Googles 2 nd
largest engineering office.
Music advertising: Related to AdSense: see next slide
AdSense for video allows publishers with video content to generate revenue using ad placements from Google's extensive videos Youtube, advertising network. This was Initiated in 2012
Without our codec And VP8 conversion integrating Vedanti, Adsense revenue from video couldnt work
Stage 1: use Simplify Music tech within Android. Simplify acquired 2/2010. Met VSL: 3/2010, codec and trade secret due diligence April 2010 Dec 2010: M&A
1) Need our codec which Google has, and built into half a dozen music business: 2) 2011-2014.
1) Stream, 2) transfer transmit in Ogg Vorbis: see Tim carabarry note within Margin Notes. See last slide: webM Vorbis audio coding: Tim is with Mozilla 2010.
2) Couldnt transmit in Ogg Vorbis. Switched to VSL. .
Google and On2 did not have a decoder.
Vedanti Systems Had built in F A S T decoder.
To prove it: Google: diary of x264 developer. May 2010. Illegal recipients of Vedanti Trade Secrets who helped Google rip off VSL . Look at VP8 effort ) Do they infringe? (yes),Can they invalidate? (No and didnt). Business?
Design Around?
They did: bad:VP8, VP9, chipsets, new webM, youTube coding replaced H;264;GoogleTV, IPTV, Google studio, Android, ads with Videos embedded, 3 intl music entities Songbird, Google Play, Google Music Locker, Cloud, dozens of patent amendments: started 10/2010: added partition, slice, macroblock pixel Googles Music Locker Now Works Like Apples and Amazons. Except Its Free. DECEMBER 18, 2012 AT 10:00 AM EXCERPT FROM GOOGLE 5/4/2014 Remember back in 2011, when all the big tech companies were working hard to create music locker services that allowed you to store\your music in the cloud so you could listen to it whenever you wanted?
Well, all of the big players Apple, Amazon and Google have them now. But its hard to tell if all the effort was worthwhile.
Perhaps we all use them, and theyre so commonplace that no one thinks to mention it anymore. But my hunch is that they havent gotten much uptake from mainstream users. It may be telling, for instance, that none of the three competitors do much boasting about usage. Because all of them like to produce big numbers when they can.
Its possible, but not likely, that todays news will change that: Google is rolling out a scan and match feature for its locker service, * which means it should be much, much faster to move songs from your computer to their servers just like Apple and Amazon already offer.
The twist is that Apple and Amazon charge users $25 a year for their service, and Googles will remain free.
Music locker blog
BELOW I S EXCERPT MAY 4, 2014, FROM GOOGLE RESEARCH MUSIC LOCKER ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SEPT. 15, 2010 - 1:00 PM ONLINE ANNOUNCEMENT
SUMMARY: A new digital music service from Google will likely include a la carte downloads, music sharing and a cloud-based digital locker where users can store their music for $25 a year,
According to a report by Billboard. Sources told the music-industry magazine that Google has been circulating a detailed proposal for just such a service to a number of record labels, hoping to get them to sign licensing deals that would allow the company to offer access to their music in the companys proposal. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Dates of Google NDA purpose signed April 2010 to engage acquisition of Vedanti Systems : was March 2010 December 16, 2010 INTENT: Google writes through August, negotiating with Vedanti and K & L Gates for: Claim charts for hg1 v H.264
Yet, Stage 1 June, Stage 2: music locker service
Music locker was active with Amazon / Apple. Google had no VP8 that could achieve it. Proof is here that VP8 was useless 2010.
Locker service uses Cloud. No VP8 was available for Cloud.
Will Google be able to disrupt the market with its new store? Right out of the gate Excerpted May 4, 2014 from Google launch DEC. 6, 2010 - 6:59 AM PDT
GOOGLE Ebooks
Google today launched its long-awaited electronic book store, called simply Google eBooks, with more than 3 million titles and 4,000 publishers participating as partners. The move is likely to ramp up competition in the e-book market, which until now has been dominated by Amazon and Apple
Google will pay the publisher 52 percent of the list price if a title is sold through Googles store, or 45 percent
is available only in the U.S. for now, but is expected to roll out in Europe and other countries early next year (2011)
Were not peddling devices here we want to focus on selling books, Crawford said
The Google e-book manager said the company is focused on what he called a cloud-based model of consumption, December 6, 2010 article. DATA TRANSMISSION IS THE NAME OF VSLS CATEGORY OF TECHNOLOGY VSL was called the holy grail invention by Akin Gump who wrote the patent. They said it was the answer to the narrow bandwidth of the Internet. VSL kept it quiet, hidden, especially the codec. The secret sauce. VSL was building a first in technology: a bundle of assets indemnified by the only family of UBER PATENTS in data transmission. Qualcomm got it in 2004 from VSL founders, and said in 2007: it is the most important invention to walk into Qualcomms door. They are the worlds largest data transmission based chipset company today.
VSL invented PARTITION of a frame: called Partitioning. The secret sauce for Google was the same for Qualcomm. It is what makes a company such as Google who uses it in all of its hundreds of renditions, a ferocious giant of the future: the Internet bandwidth is too narrow for video compression. It must use VSLs solution of encoding, slice ,partition, lossless data solution.
Max Sound Corps Greg Halpern wanted VSL to sue Google. He showed VSL that Max Sounds joint venture with VSL is the way forward for a technology that launched the mobile wave. That is why VSL and MaxD are partners.