Professional Documents
Culture Documents
n
i
i
KPI fail ob
ONE scope
All Rights Reserved Alcatel-Lucent 2009 32 | November 2009
Risk assessment
Risk Definition (2/2)
Based on above we can have some margins to reduce the risk by statistical
manipulation:
Create acceptance not dependent on target achievement on all KPI
Use composite KPIs instead of simple ones
Ex: use CSSR instead of SDR and ASR
ONE scope
All Rights Reserved Alcatel-Lucent 2009 33 | November 2009
Risk assessment
Risk Evaluation
Medium or High
Risk:
the mitigation plan
shall be discussed
with all the teams
ONE scope
The KPI Risk could be split in different parts:
Project: Risk of new resources to be mobilized to reach KPIs
Design: Risk of addition of new HW to reach KPIs
Optimisation: Risk of more time for optimisation to reach KPIs
New Features: Risk of addition of new features
.
ONE or ND do not quantify the amount of money or any cost related with risk
In each risk identified we should quantify the different parts (Project, design,
..) in following thresholds:
NA -> The risk do not apply
Low risk -> target without major problems to reach
Medium Risk -> target that can be reached with more effort from ALU
High Risk -> target hard to reach, but can be reached with more effort
All Rights Reserved Alcatel-Lucent 2009 34 | November 2009
The KPI Risk mitigation could be made by:
KPI formula -> Service team impact
Ex: Use of composed KPI is less risky than use of simple KPIs
KPI Pre-requisites -> Service team impact
Ex: measurement done outside BH
KPI acceptance -> Service team impact
Ex: Use of special acceptance process could lead to less risk
Feature Activation
Ex: if we know that a special feature will easily make the target to be reached,
then we should alert the Commercial team for that
Risk Aggregation
In projects where we need to commit in several regions, it is less risky if we can
aggregate the risk in one package instead of considering individual risk for
each region
Risk assessment
Risk Mitigation
ONE scope
All Rights Reserved Alcatel-Lucent 2009 35 | November 2009
All Rights Reserved Alcatel-Lucent 2009 36 | November 2009
In each point related with KPI we should put ALU point of view in following
terms:
Compliant: we agree on what is stated
Non-Compliant: We do not agree on what is stated -> Justification needed
Partially Compliant: We partially agree on what is stated -> Justification needed
In statement of Compliancy ONE should answer to following points, generally
in a KPI annex:
KPI targets
KPI measurement methodology
KPI acceptance method
Features
Deliverables
Statement of Compliancy
ONE scope
All Rights Reserved Alcatel-Lucent 2009 37 | November 2009
The KPI annex is where we need to define all the relevant points related with
KPIs. It normally includes:
KPI targets
Measurement method
Acceptance method
Pre-requisites to reach KPIs
The document is generally composed by:
Objective: explain that the aim of document is to give a detailed descriptions of KPI
and acceptance process
KPI Definition: Exact KPI definition with formulas
KPI Acceptance Methodology
Pre-Requisites: conditions that need to be meet in order to do the acceptance process
Deliverables
KPI annex (1/2)
ONE scope
All Rights Reserved Alcatel-Lucent 2009 38 | November 2009
The wording of this document must be:
Clear: some of the people that will read it are not so technical
Technical accurate: To avoid misunderstandings in future
Commercial Approach: since is a document for costumer we shall give a positive
feeling about ALU
Ex: some words should be used carefully (or not used), like impossible,
difficult, risk,
Protective: we must ensure as much as possible to protect ALU from issues that
are not controlled by ALU
Ex: traffic evolution, subcontractor services from Costumer,
Deliverables
KPI annex (2/2)
ONE scope
All Rights Reserved Alcatel-Lucent 2009 39 | November 2009
All Rights Reserved Alcatel-Lucent 2009 40 | November 2009
Greenfield Operator
Characterization
No KPI history
Limited information about the environment and clutter
Radio Design made based on Marketing Figures
Low Traffic existing on the network by the time of acceptance
The acceptance normally made by Drive-Test KPIs
All Rights Reserved Alcatel-Lucent 2009 41 | November 2009
Greenfield Operator
Important Points to know
Available Bandwidth
Average TRX per Cell.
Traffic distribution between Urban and Rural areas
Antenna type used
Terrain Profile (hilly, flat, forests, )
Typical Questionnaire:
To be filled in by ND
All Rights Reserved Alcatel-Lucent 2009 42 | November 2009
Greenfield Operator
Method for definition of KPIs (1/3)
KPI Commitment is only possible if ALU is responsible for Optimisation
services after rollout.
Coverage assessment:
BoQ and list of areas covered
Antennas used for Coverage:
Tri-sector with more than 16dBi gain are assumed for KPI
If high number of antennas with less than 16dBi then KPIs needs to be
adjusted.
Major risks for coverage (old terrain database, traffic data not accurate, )
ND normally add a coverage risk between 0% and 10% of the sites
Watermill and 9955 Tools are used by ND to define Link Budgets and coverage
plots
After this assessment we should be able to define:
Areas where we can commit.
Possible exclusion criteria for acceptance.
Identify possible risks for KPIs
All Rights Reserved Alcatel-Lucent 2009 43 | November 2009
Bandwidth assessment (by each band GSM or DCS):
In this phase it should be identified:
If it is a tight frequency plan
If special features is needed to overcome interference
ex: C/I<10dB, it must be used f. hopping and DTX
Risk found by ND related with traffic evolution preview
Greenfield Operator
Method for definition of KPIs (2/3)
Acceptance method needs to be
chosen carefully, although since
during the acceptance there is
Low traffic on the network,
normally this load is not
achieved.
12
_ _ _ _
_ 200 _ _