Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Management IA
1.5 points
The Business IA is worth:
2.5 points
Your Task:
To write a commentary based
on 3-5 documents covering a
common theme, 1,500 words.
Meaning
You have to write a commentary on a
real issue or problem, not a fictional
one, with a title presented as a
question.
The commentary must refer directly
to a single business organisation, but
may consider industry-wide issues
that impact on that organisation.
25 % of
the final
mark
1% of
your final
mark
Or:
Every mark
you get
An Example question
An Example question
An Example question
An Example question
The Format:
1. Title (in the form of a question)
2. Introduction (including a description of
methodology)
3. Findings (based on the supporting
documents)
4. Analysis of the findings
5. Conclusion(s)
6. Bibliography and references
7. Appendices: supporting documents
Supporting Documents
Some secondary sources:
market research surveys
articles from local, national
or international press
financial reports
business accounts
business plans
mission statements
web based surveys
extracts from co websites
govt and other statistics
academic publications
Supporting Documents
To achieve the highest levels of each assessment
criterion, it is strongly recommended that the
supporting documents will present a range of
ideas and views.
Forecasting
SWOT
Analysis
Product Life
Cycle
Motivational
Theory
TQM
CSR
Marketing Mix
Stakeholder
Conflicts
Economies of
scale
PEST
Analysis
Investment
Appraisal
Motivational
Theory
Break Even
Analysis
BCG Matrix
Benchmarking
Ansoff Matrix
Channels of Distribution
Leadership
Theory
Communication
Theory
Organisational Charts
An example A Product
Positioning Map
If your commentary is a marketing
one then you may well decide to
introduce a product position map.
High Price
Apple
Creative
iriver
Oregon
Low Price
Source:
I did a survey of 20 randomly selected
students from my school as they are the
ones who use MP3 players the most.
High Price
iriver
Archos
Beosound
Apple Nano
Apple Photo
Rio
Sharp
Apple Shuffle
Oregon
Low Price
Creative (Muvo)
Ministry of
Sound
MPman
Source:
What Hi Fi? Sound & Vision Awards 2005
Survey criterion System: MP3, AAC or
WMA; Radio, Microphone, Storage capacity,
USB, FireWire, Battery life, Dimensions &
Weight
Use 3 or 4 techniques.
2.
Assessment Criteria
Total = 25 marks
A = 4 marks
B = 6 marks
C = 6 marks
D = 3 marks
E = 3 marks
F = 3 marks
Assessment criterion A:
supporting documents
There are three to five supporting documents.
The documents cover a range of ideas and
views.
The supporting documents are contemporary in
nature, written within the last two years.
The relevant parts of the supporting documents
are highlighted.
The documents are relevant to the issue or
problem being examined.
Different types of documents are included.
Assessment criterion B:
Choice and application of business
tools, techniques and theory
Business tools and techniques are included in the
commentary.
Business theory is included in the commentary.
The tools, techniques and theory are relevant to the
question posed.
The commentary includes a range of tools, techniques
and theories.
Assessment criterion C:
Use, analysis and synthesis of
data
There is evidence that data is used,
analysed and synthesized.
Data from the supporting documents is
used to help answer the question posed.
The ideas are written in a clearly structured
and logical manner.
Assessment criterion D:
Conclusions
The conclusion(s) are relevant and answer
the question posed in the title.
The conclusions are supported by the data
from the supporting documents.
The conclusions are a logical extension of
the arguments.
Assessment criterion E:
Evaluation and critical thinking
Judgments are made.
All judgments are substantiated.
The nature of the supporting documents
has been considered.
The reasons why the problem or issue
exists have been discussed.
Assessment criterion F:
Presentation
The written commentary is within the word limit.
Sources are provided for all the supporting documents.
Sources are provided for any quotations used in the written commentary.
The referencing is consistent throughout.
An appropriate bibliography is provided.
Subject-specific terminology has been used throughout the commentary.