Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Thesis Presentation
Alex Dekhtyar
for CSC 590
Part I.
M.S. Defense
M.S. Defense
+ What?
+ When?
+ Who?
+ How Long?
M.S. Defense
What?
- Final step
+ When?
+ Who?
+ How Long?
M.S. Defense
+ What?
- When?
+ Who?
+ How Long?
+What?
+When?
- Who?
- You
- Advisor
- Committee
+How Long?
M.S. Defense
M.S. Defense
+ What?
+ When?
+ Who?
- How Long?
Presentation: 30 45 mins
Questions and Answers: 10 30 mins
Discussion: 5 15 mins
Total: 45 90 mins
M.S. Defense
+ What?
+ When?
+ Who?
- How Long?
c
Presentation: 30 45 mins
i
l
b
u
P
Questions and Answers: 10 30 mins
Closed doors
Discussion: 5 15 mins
Total: 45 90 mins
Logistics
Committee Selection
Defense Scheduling
Talk Preparation
Committee Selection
Committee = Advisor + at least 2 more
faculty members
Selected by: You and Advisor
Select:
(a)Those who know you
(b)Those who know the field
When: as early as possible
Scheduling Defense
h
t
i
w
e
n s
o
D si
e
h
t
s
k
e
e
w
e
e
Thr
e
m
i
t
f
o
d
a
ahe
sis is
e
h
t
r
e
t
f
A
complete
e
s
n
e
f
e
d
e
l
u
d
Sche
around here
Talk Preparation
You show
props
slides
Alexs rules
For 1 hour talk:
First set : 24 hours
Second set:12 hours
Third set : 6 hours
You speak
Think ...
Memorize
first 2-5 mins
Practice,
practice,
practice
Talk Preparation
First rehearsal
with advisor
24-48 hours
Alexs rules
For 1 hour talk:
First set : 24 hours
Second set:12 hours
Third set : 6 hours
Defense
Second rehearsal
with advisor
24-48 hours
Logistics
Committee Selection
Defense Scheduling
Talk Preparation
Structure of Presentation
Presentation Style
Delivery
Slides
Part II.
Presentation Structure
Presentation Outline
Title Slide: backstory
Teaser
Outline
Introduction/Motivation
Problem
Background
Solution
Implementation
Validation
Related work
Future work and conclusions
7 12 minutes
5 20(!) minutes
10 - 25 minutes
5 - 10 minutes
3 - 5 minutes
Advisor
Masters Thesis
Thesis mention
By
Mark Barry
Name
Department
University
February 2007
Date
Karthikeyan Sethuramasubbu
Advisor: Dr. Alexander Dekhtyar
University of
Kentucky
Chad Smith
March, 2009
Department of Computer Science
California Polytechnic State University,
SLO
Speak
Who you are
What you do
How you came across
this project
... a smooth transition
to next slide...
Teaser
DOM
DOM
DOM
Distributed DOM
DOM Parser
XML
XML
XML
Karthikeyan S.
Multi-hierarchical XML
Teaser (Optional)
Slides
Slide(s) before Outline
One-three slides
screen shots
output (e.g. In graphics)
architecture diagram
best experimental data
Speak
30-second version of your
thesis talk
Why
Show your contribution
right away
When
Your Intro/Background
part is long (15+ mins)
Sravanthi Vadlamudi
Project Goal
Edito
r
User
Tools
DB Driver
Query
Processo
r
Query
Processo
r
GODDAG
DB Driver
In-memory data
structure
XML
Special
DBMS
RDBMS
Persistent
support
Extende
dXPath Extende
XQuery
d
Concurrent Parser
Driver
XML
(TEI)
Driver
JITTS
Driver
BUVH
XML
XML
Other
representatio
Emil Iacob
Outline
Outline
Introduction
Contributions
Previous Work
Initial Exploration
Dual Contouring With Normal Map Extraction
Results
Conclusion and Future Work
Mark Barry
Outline
Slide
List of key
milestones in talk
Speak
VERY LITTLE!
Presentation Outline
Title Slide: backstory
Teaser
Outline
Introduction/Motivation
Problem
Background
Solution
Implementation
Validation
Related work
Future work and conclusions
Introduction/Motivation
Your Goals
1. Explain the subject area
2. Motivate your problem
3. State your contributions
5-10 minutes
Introduction (contd)
My Contributions
Signature files
Abstraction
Storage requirements
Search space
Network traffic
Backend load sharing
Query manager
Building SQL statements
Query shipment decisions
Saad Ijad
Contributions
Direct extraction of low-resolution meshes with
normal maps from volume data
One integrated step
Excellent visual results
Fast
Benefits:
Shortcuts the current multi-step process
High-resolution mesh never generated
No extra high- to low-resolution simplification process
Efficient search generating normal maps
Mark Barry
Problem Definition
Formal Problem statement
must be found in your talk
May be fully covered in Introduction
May be fully covered in Background
May need to be formally stated separately
Mark Barry
Introduction
Problem:
High-resolution meshes = slow to render
Use low-resolution meshes
Fast to render
Still look good
One of a
number of
slides
Speak
Articulate the problem
Use stress, inflection
Background
Committee members
must understand what
your work is about
Background
Non-Functional Requirements
1. (Relatively) short
2. Explain all necessary things
3. Sufficient to explain/introduce/define your problem
4. Should assume
General CS knowledge within curriculum
No special topic knowledge
What is XML?
Attribute
name
<student id=123456>
Attribute
value
Markup
content
<major>Computer Science</major>
</college>
</student>
XML schema to Validate XML
<!ELEMENT Student (firstname, lastname, college)
<!ELEMENT college (#PCDATA | major)*>
<!ATTLIST Student id ID #REQUIRED>
<!ELEMENT firstname #PCDATA>
Karthikeyan S.
id=123456
<firstname> <lastname>
XXX
<college>
element
node
YYY
College of
Engineering
attribut
e node
Text
node
<major>
Computer
Science
Karthikeyan S.
Path Expressions
<student>
id=123456
<firstname> <lastname>
XXX
YYY
<college>
College of
Engineering
<major>
Computer
Science
Example:
Location step
axis
Node-test
predicate
Karthikeyan S.
context
node
XPath Axes
child
id=123456
<firstname> <lastname>
XXX
<college>
descendant
ancestor
YYY
College of
Engineering
child
<major> parent
preceding
Computer following
Science
attribute
Karthikeyan S.
Presentation Outline
Title Slide: backstory
Teaser
Outline
Introduction/Motivation
Problem
Background
Solution
Implementation
Validation
Related work
Future work and conclusions
e
m
i
t
r
u
o
Y
!
e
n
i
h
s
to
DO:
Think about it...
Come up with a narrative
Concentrate on ideas
Explain
DONT:
Remember:
Highlight that this is your work!
Formal description of your work is called thesis
Presentation = high level description
You get (at most) one chance to go technical
Use it wisely
A picture is worth a thousand words
Specific things
Definitions
Example/Illustration
Formal statement
xdescendant
xancestor
Semantics:
xancestor(n) := {x | start-index(x)
start-index(n) and
end-index(x) end Algorithms for linear evaluation of
index(x)}
axes
precedingoverlapping
followingoverlapping
and their
combinations
Specific things
Definitions
Example/Illustration
Formal statement
Specific things
Algorithms/Methods/Techniques
Example/Illustration
Pseudocode
Code
Math
Mark Barry
Mark Barry
Contour vertices
with normals
Marching Cubes
contour surface
Mark Barry
Contour vertices
with normals
Marching Cubes
contour surface
Mark Barry
xdescendant (Pseudo-code)
evaluateXdescendant (n, hname, result)
{
if n is leaf-node
return null
evaluateDescendant (n, hname, result)
append result to a Vector V
for each element p in Vector V
if Start index of p is in between the start and end index of n
append p to result
return result
}
Karthikeyan S.
Swati Tata
Swati Tata
y
z
2 x ab sin(bx)
f ( x, y, z ) 2 y ab sin(by )
2 z ab sin(bz )
y
z
y
x
x
Mark Barry
Specific things
Algorithms/Methods/Techniques
Example/Illustration
Pseudocode
Code
Math
Specific things
Software
Architecture Diagram
Component-by-component coverage
Implementation Info
Screenshots/Walkthroughs
Output
Demo
Edito
r
User
Tools
DB Driver
Query
Processo
r
Query
Processo
r
GODDAG
DB Driver
In-memory data
structure
XML
Special
DBMS
RDBMS
Persistent
support
Extende
dXPath Extende
XQuery
d
Concurrent Parser
Driver
XML
(TEI)
Driver
JITTS
Driver
BUVH
XML
XML
Architecture Diagram
Other
representatio
Emil Iacob
Sravanthi Vadlamudi
Software Screenshots/
Walkthrough
Sravanthi Vadlamudi
Advanced mode
Sravanthi Vadlamudi
Trace tab
Sravanthi Vadlamudi
Sravanthi Vadlamudi
Sravanthi Vadlamudi
Browse tab
Sravanthi Vadlamudi
Sravanthi Vadlamudi
138,632
triangles
Output
8,216
triangles
Mark Barry
Results
Mark Barry
Implementation
Emulation
Java 2 Micro Edition
Sun Wireless Toolkit
Oracle, SQL Server 2000, MS
Access
Java Database Connectivity
Implementation Details
Saad Ijad
Presentation Outline
Title Slide: backstory
Teaser
Outline
Introduction/Motivation
Problem
Background
Solution
Implementation
Validation
Related work
Future work and conclusions
Validation
Validation
- Experiment
- Case Study
- Software V&V
- Testimony
Validation
Validation
- Hypothesis/Objective of study
- Experimental/Case study design
- Validation activities, ...
Validation
Validation
Validation
Validation
Validation
Evaluation Outline
Original text is taken from James Joyces Ulysses
(project Gutenberg)
Used 10 hierarchies
Markup generated randomly for these 10
hierarchies
Karthikeyan S.
Evaluation Outline
Four sets of queries
Queries that test individual axes
/xdescendant:: line/ancestor::*
Experimental Results
Karthikeyan S.
Experimental Results
Karthikeyan S.
Experimental Results
Karthikeyan S.
Results
225,467
quads
558
quads
360 ms
1 ms
Mark Barry
Results
225,467
quads
65
quads
360 ms
0.3 ms
Mark Barry
Results
150,823
quads
10,950
quads
245 ms
22 ms
92.7% fewer polygons
11.1x faster to render
Mark Barry
Results
64,896
quads
3,035
quads
103 ms
6 ms
95.3% fewer polygons
17.2x faster to render
Mark Barry
Results
56,637
quads
91 ms
1,406
quads
97.5% fewer polygons
3 ms
Mark Barry
Sravanthi Vadlamudi
Results of Survey
Simple experiment to trace 22 high level with 52 low
level requirements is assigned.
Experiment was done on 30 students of
class cs617.
Sravanthi Vadlamudi
Questions of Survey
Questions common to both groups.
The project could be completed quickly.
The project was tedious.
If I were The project was simple to complete.
performing a similar task in the future, I would want to use a
software tool to assist.
2 3 4
Sravanthi Vadlamudi
Results of survey(Contd)
From the analysis of the result :
Students liked using RETRO.
Students of manual group preferred using
some software tool.
Sravanthi Vadlamudi
Presentation Outline
Title Slide: backstory
Teaser
Outline
Introduction/Motivation
Problem
Background
Solution
Implementation
Validation
Related work
Future work and conclusions
Related Work
Terse:
List of papers
nothing else
Verbose
Overview
Detailed description of one-two approaches
Compare-and-contrast
Previous Work
Contour surface (mesh) extraction from
volumes
Adaptive contouring
Dual contouring
Generating normal maps
Concurrent Hierarchies
Representation of non-well-formed features within the same XML
document
TEI Guidelines (P4)
Milestone (empty) elements
Here, drawbacks of
existing work are used
to motivate research
Splits
<line> Se Boetius ws ore naman <w id=1>ha</w> </line>
<line> <w id=1>ten</w> <w>Seuerin<dmg id=2>us</dmg></w> <w><dmg id=2> s</dmg>e</w> ws
heretoga </line>
<line>Romana </line>
Emil Iacob
Future Work
Promises, promises:
1. Fix known weaknesses/incompletness
2. Add new features
3. Apply to something else
Application to games?
2
Determine good simplification error metric
Optimal placement of fine details in normal map
vs. mesh
Mark Barry
Future Enhancements
1
Sravanthi Vadlamudi
Future Work
Promises, promises:
1. Fix known weaknesses/incompletness
2. Add new features
3. Apply to something else
Who?
Not necessarily you
Be bold!
Conclusions
What you did
What you achieved
What you learned
What you published
Part III.
Presentation Style
Next Time!