You are on page 1of 22

MATERIALS SELECTION

by

Teddy Sjafrizal

Teddy Sjafrizal @2015

MATERIALS SELECTION

Page 1

MAIN CONSIDERATIONS
The interaction between function, material,
shape, and process lies at the heart of the
material selection process
The selection of a material and process cannot
be separated from the choice of shape.
We use the word shape to include the external,
and internal, (e.g honeycomb ).
To make the shape, the material is subjected to
processes (e.g casting, forging, machining,
polishing and joining processes)
Function dictates the choice of both material and
shape.
Process is influenced by the material:
( formability, machinability, weld ability, heattreatability, etc)
Process interacts with shape the process
determines the shape, the size, the precision
and, the cost.
Teddy Sjafrizal @2015

MATERIALS SELECTION

Page 2

MECHANICAL PROPERTIES

Teddy Sjafrizal @2015

MATERIALS SELECTION

Page 3

MECHANICAL PROPERTIES

Teddy Sjafrizal @2015

MATERIALS SELECTION

Page 4

MATERIAL SELECTION
GUIDELINESS

Teddy Sjafrizal @2015

MATERIALS SELECTION

Page 5

MATERIAL SELECTION
GUIDELINESS

Teddy Sjafrizal @2015

MATERIALS SELECTION

Page 6

MATERIAL SELECTION STEPS


TRANSLATING
Function
:
What does component do?
Constraints
:
What non-negotiable conditions must be
met?
What negotiable but desirable conditions ?
Objective
:
What is to be maximized or minimized?
Free variables :
What parameters of the problem is the
designer free to change?
SCREENING : eliminates candidates that
cannot do the job at all

Teddy Sjafrizal @2015

MATERIALS SELECTION

Page 7

MATERIAL SELECTION STEPS


RANK : measure how well a candidate that has passed the
screening step can do the job. Performance is sometimes limited
by a single property, sometimes by a combination of them
SUPPORTING INFORMATION : it is descriptive, graphical or
pictorial, details of its corrosion behavior in particular
environments, information of availability and pricing, experience of
its environmental impact

Teddy Sjafrizal @2015

MATERIALS SELECTION

Page 8

CASE STUDY

Known :
The heat sink must be a good electrical insulator, meaning a resistivity e > 1019
.cm. But to drain heat away from the chip as fast as possible, it must also
have the highest possible thermal conductivity, .
Translating .
Function

Heat Sink

Constraints

Material must be good insulator, or e >


1019 .cm
All dimensions are specified

Objective

Maximize thermal conductivity

Free variables

Choice of Material

Teddy Sjafrizal @2015

MATERIALS SELECTION

Page 9

CASE STUDY
Screen :
Resistivity
e > 1019 .cm.
Rank :
Maximum thermal
conductivity.

Result :
Aluminium Oxide

Teddy Sjafrizal @2015

MATERIALS SELECTION

Page 10

MATERIAL INDICES
Material indices when objectives are coupled to constraints
.

Teddy Sjafrizal @2015

MATERIALS SELECTION

Page 11

A schematic E- chart showing guidelines for the three material indices for stiff,
lightweight design.

Teddy Sjafrizal @2015

MATERIALS SELECTION

Page 12

CASE STUDY

Minimize mass

Function

Column (supporting compressive loads)

Constraints

Length L specified
Must not buckle under design loads
Must not fracture if accidentally struck

Objective

Minimize the mass, m


Maximize slenderness

Free variables

Diameter of legs, 2r
Choice of material

Maximize slenderness

Teddy Sjafrizal @2015

MATERIALS SELECTION

Page 13

PROCESS SELECTION

Teddy Sjafrizal @2015

MATERIALS SELECTION

Page 14

PROCESS SELECTION

Teddy Sjafrizal @2015

Function

What must the process do


? Shappe? Join ? Finish ?

Constraints

What material, shape, size,


precision , must it provide ?

Objective

What is to be maximed or
minimized ? ( cost ? Time ?
Quality ? )

Free
variables

Choice of process
Process chain options

MATERIALS SELECTION

Page 15

PROCESS SELECTION
Case study : Forming a FAN
Function

Fan

Constraints

Material : Nylon
Shape : 3D solid
Mass: 0.1 -0.2 kg
Minimum section : 4 mm
Precision : 0.5mm
Roughness : < 1 m
Batch size : 10,000

Objective

Minimize cost

Free variables

Choice of process

Result
Process

Comment

Injection
Molding

Meets all design constraints

Compression
molding

May need further finishing operations

Teddy Sjafrizal @2015

MATERIALS SELECTION

Page 16

The processmaterial
compatibility matrix

Teddy Sjafrizal @2015

MATERIALS SELECTION

Page 17

The processshape compatibility


matrix

Teddy Sjafrizal @2015

MATERIALS SELECTION

Page 18

The processmass range chart

Teddy Sjafrizal @2015

MATERIALS SELECTION

Page 19

The processsection thickness


chart

Teddy Sjafrizal @2015

MATERIALS SELECTION

Page 20

The processtolerance chart

Teddy Sjafrizal @2015

MATERIALS SELECTION

Page 21

The processsurface
roughness chart

Teddy Sjafrizal @2015

MATERIALS SELECTION

Page 22

You might also like