Scoping Workshop!

on the Costs of Injustice

to the Marginalized
Supreme Court and UNDP Democratic
Governance Group
December 2 and 3, 2013
La Breza Hotel, Quezon City

Welcome!
Judge Geraldine Econg
Deputy Clerk of Court and
Judicial Reform Program
Administrator
Program Management Office
Supreme Court of the Philippines

Who We Are

iCLD
Our Team: Committed and
competent coach-facilitators, and
support staff.

Our

Approach: multi-arts based

learning approach and CoachFacilitation

Our

Programs are customized,

directly addressing client needs

Our

Focus: Generating HEART

within Organizations and
Communities
Inspired by Landmark Education and Stephen Covey Jr.

i-CLD
Founded

by Carmen Leonor Mench Diokno

Licensed

Coach Facilitator for Coaching

Clinic Program, an ICF accredited program

Regional

trainer for LOreal for SE Asia.

Mench

has more than 21 years of solid

experience in organizational development
and has an innate ability to customize
programs that directly address specific
client needs.

This

strength, coupled with her extensive

experience in human resource development
has been instrumental in enabling clients to
increase productivity levels and in
furthering the growth of their people.

Our
Partner

OUR CLIENTS

Gerry Roxas Foundation

GRLA Gerry Roxas Leadership

Awardees
LGU Cagwait, Surigao del Sur
MinTVET
UN Missions (Africa)
UNICEF
UNDP
Local Government Academy
Government Service Insurance
System (GSIS)
Council for the Welfare of
Children
PhilExIm Credit Agency
LoGoTri Philnet
Samar Climate Change
Commission
Department of Interior and Local
Government (DILG)
National Food Authority (NFA)
LGSP-LED

SunPower Philippines
Cypress Philippines
Lafarge
Emerson Climate
Technologies
Emerson Network Power
Nidec Motor Corp.
Liebert Domestic Services
Continental Temic
San Miguel Corporation
Globe Telecom
Nokia Siemens Networks
Monsanto Phils.
CalEnergy Intl Ltd
Magsaysay Group of
Companies
Pepsico International
Silver Secrets Inc.
Bayantrade
Anflocor
Accenture
SM Food Group
Concepcion Carrier
Airconditioning Corporation
Actuarial Society of the
Phils.
Industrial Inspection
International
Schneider Electric

VXI Global Solutions

Newly Weds Food Inc.
Manila Polo Club
Team Manila
Manels Leathergoods Inc
Monark Equipment
Republic Chemical
Industries
AFPMBAI
PNPROLAI
Landco Pacific Inc.
Ortigas & Co. Ltd
PAHRDF
Lufthansa Technik Phils.
SunLife Financials
Metro Drug Inc.
LOreal Paris
Panpharma Meinz Inc.
Nestor Distributors
Philippines Inc.
Diversey
Philippines AirAsia
Matimco
Energy Development Corp.
Philip Morris Philippines Mfg.
Inc.
Axis REIT

Our
Program/Topics

Leading & Managing Change: Transforming an

Organization

Results-Based Leadership Development

i-Linc: Practical Team Effectiveness

Coaching

Coaching Clinic

Mentoring

Creative Thinking

Visioning and Strategic Planning

Personal Mastery

T2T: Train Trainers

Effective Facilitation

Team Building

Work Life Choices

Creative Selling

Methodolo
Adult Learning: The activities are
gy
aligned with daily work environment
and uses workplace scenarios

Transformational Model:
Participants become aware of their
mindsets, see possibilities, & choose
the context, which drives the
behavior which produces the results.

Learner-Centered

Approach: An
approach that marries theory with
practical application. Participants
experience learning through the
application of different intelligences
and learning styles

General
Objective
As an initial process, the two-day
scoping workshop shall be
convened with members of different
marginalized sectors in order to
define the costs of injustice as a
concept.

Specific
Objectives
Surface/Identify the definition/meaning and the scope and
boundaries of the costs of injustice based on how the
marginalized sectors perceive and experience them in
actual fact;
Assess the socio-economic and intangible costs/burdens
caused by case delay and/or prejudicial decisions that
impact on the poors capacity to be economically
productive and pursue a normal life; and,
Undertake a valuation (assessment/estimation in monetary
terms) of any economic impacts, such as loss of income,
property, assets, employment, and other gainful
opportunities.
Laugh, have fun, relax and get to re-discover things in a

Time

Day 1
Outline

Activity

DAY 1 (December 02, 2013): DEFINING INJUSTICE

8:30am

Registration

9:00

Opening Program
National Anthem
Welcome Remarks
Expectations Check
Overview and Objectives

10:00

Coffee Break and Snacks

10:20

Session 1: Judge Geraldine Faith A. Econg

Differentiating Justice and Injustice
Supreme Court Definition of Justice and Injustice

11:20

Session 2: What Injustices Have You Experienced?

12:30pm

Lunch

13:30

Session 2: Continued

Time

Day 1
Outline

Activity

DAY 1 (December 02, 2013): DEFINING INJUSTICE

15:00

Session 3: Redress

15:00

Working Coffee break and Snacks

17:20

Health Break

17:25

Session 4: Effects of Justice Not Served or Not Served

Quickly:
Self
Family
Community

19:00

Recap

Dinner

Time

Day 2
Outline

Activity

DAY 2 (December 03, 2013): ASSESSING THE COSTS OF INJUSTICE

8:30am

Registration

9:00

Q & A, Recap

9:30

Session 5: Identify Losses

10:30

Working Break

12:00pm

Lunch

13:00

Session 6: Impact on Self

15:00

Coffee Break and Snacks

15:30

Session 7: Moving Froward

17:30

Session 8: Acknowledgement and Completion

19:00

Evaluation and Dinner

DAY 3 (December 03, 2013): Departure (Check Out Time - before 12:00nn)

Day 1:
Setting the
Stage
Defining
Injustice and
Costs

Day 2:
SocioEconomic
and
Intangible
Costs and
Assessments

Day 1
Setting the Stage
1.Defining
Injustice
2.Reality Check:
Costs of
Injustice

Getting to know
you
Draw a symbol of yourself.
Introduce yourself by:
Saying, Hi Im ___________.
Show your symbol and share why you chose this to
symbolise yourself
Share why you are in this scoping workshop and what you
want to gain by participating in this workshop.

Creating Our
Game

Game
"A game is a system in which players engage in an artificial
conflict, defined by rules, that results in a quantifiable
outcome." (Katie Salen and Eric Zimmerman)[7]
"A game is a form of art in which participants, termed players,
make decisions in order to manage resources through game
tokens in the pursuit of a goal."
"A game is an activity among two or more independent
decision-makers seeking to achieve their objectives in some
limiting context." (Clark C. Abt)[9]

A Game of

Coffee Break

Tea
Break

Defining
Justice and
Injustice
Judge Geraldine Econg

Deputy Clerk of Court and

Judicial Reform Program
Administrator
Program Management Office
Supreme Court of the Philippines

Injustices You
have
Workshop
Experienced

Workshop
Think of an actual experience where you suffered
injustice.
Share your experience with your group.
Each participant will have five minutes to share
their experience.
As a group, select a story that best represents
your group. You will re-enact this. Please make
sure that everyone in your group participates in
this role play.
Five minutes per group role-play.

LUNC
H

Presentations!
Injustices Experienced

Session 3: Seeking
Focus
Group Discussion
Redress

Seeking Redress
1. Who did you first approach to help you
in this situation?
2. Why did you approach them first?
3. Who actually helped you?
4. When did you decide to approach a
lawyer?
5. At what point did you go to court?

Session 4: Effects
of Justice Not
Served or Not
Key Informant Quickly
Interviews
Served

Session 4: Effects of
Justice Not Served or
Not Served Quickly
SELF:
How was justice not served?
What was the effect on you that justice was not served?
Where there delays? What did the delays in serving justice do to you?
What did you lose?
What are there things you had to put off or give up?
How did this affect your ability to earn a living for your family?
How did you begin to feel about yourself?
FAMILY:
What happened to your family? Where your relationships affected? Please
explain.
COMMUNITY:

Session 4: Effects of
Justice Not Served or
Not Served Quickly
FAMILY:
Was your family affected by justice not being served?
What happened to your family?
Where your relationships affected? Please explain.
COMMUNITY:
Was there an effect on the community?
If so, how did this affect the community?

Day 2
assessing the
costs of INJUSTICE
1.Identifying
Losses
2.Moving Forward

Session 5: Identify
Losses
Identify

loss in terms
of money, property,
assets, time,
relationships,
employment and
business
opportunities.

Session 5:
Identifying Losses
(World Cafe)
1. Time Loss: How many productive days were lost
by the delays? How much is the cost of a day lost?
2. Property Loss: Did you lose any property? What
property did you lose? What was the value of the
property lost? (money, sentiment)
3. Asset Loss: What assets did you lose? What was
value of the asset that was lost? How did you feel
about the loss of your asset? How did this loss
affect your ability to earn a living?

1.

Session 5:
Identifying Losses
(World
Cafe)
Money Loss: Were your finances affected? Could you give us
an estimate as to how much money was lost?

2. Relationship Cost: In what areas where your relationships

affected by justice not being served? What happened to your
relationships? Did you lose any relationships as an effect of
justice not being served?
3. Employment Opportunities Lost: Did you have any
employment opportunities that you had to give up because of
the case? What led you to give it up? What was the potential
loss from this employment opportunity?
4. Business or Livelihood Opportunities Lost: Did any
business or livelihood opportunities come up during the course
of the case? Were you able to pursue this? If not, what do you
think was the opportunity lost?If you could put an amount to
this loss, what would it be?

LUNC
H

Session 6: Impact on
Self (feelings,
perceptions)
Newspaper
Sculpture

Newspaper Sculpture
Think about how you felt, what you
thought when justice was served.
Share this with your team.
Together create a sculpture that can
stand by itself using the materials
provided.
You will present your sculpture to the
class.
3 Minute presentation

W
E

Build stronger teams and collaborative

cultures.

We

Presentation
Author
Titleor Subtitle

Wha
t

strikes
messag
you
e
about the

of this video?

On a scale of 110, how wecentered are

we?

1
Value-Subtractors

Me-first, disconnected, cynical. Two-percent.

*Statistics from Logan, King and Fischer-Wright, Tribal Leadership.

2
Job-Holders

Me-first, indifferent, one or two connections. Twenty-five

percent.

3
Value-Adders

Me-first, project-centered, team is for coordination. Forty-nine

percent.

4
Value-Creators

Turf mentality, team-centered, us vs. them. Twenty-four

percent.
VS.

5
Difference-Makers

We-first mentality, enterprise-centered. Two-percent.

Difference-Makers

Value-Creators

3
2
1

2%

We, then me.

Us vs. them: turf mentality.

Value-Adders
Me, then we: project centered, min.
team.

Job-Holders

22
%
49
%
25
%

Me-centered: indifferent.

Value-Subtractors

2%

Me-centered: disconnected.
*Statistics from Logan, King and Fischer-Wright, USC Marshall School of Business.

Average
score.

"Things last
longer when
we compete
against
ourselves for
the good of
others,
instead of
competing
against
others for the
Simon Sinek

Session 7: Moving
Forward
What would you like to see happen?
What changes will ensure that
justice is served? That there are no
more delays
What kind of response from the
courts are you looking for?

Session 8:
Completion
Acknowledgements and
Thank Yous