Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Case
28F C-section October 2013
Pap smear completed for abnormal looking cervix
HSIL
Case
GyneHx:
G1P1, no OCP use, ?prior Pap smear
PMHx:
Right synovial cell sarcoma of anterolateral thigh age 12
Adjuvant RT 1998 Total dose 64Gy
Insufficiency fracture 2007
Plan:
1. Concurrent CRT: EBRT 46Gy/23# + Cisplatin
Ovarian transposition prior to treatment
2.
Brachytherapy
brachys (short) and therapeia (treatment)
therapeutic use of encapsulated radionuclides (ionizing
radiation) applied at the surface (intracavitary) or placed
within (interstitial) tumour or area at risk
Intracavitary
Interstitial
Intraluminal
Intravascular
Surface Applications
Permanents Seed (Prostate)
Brachytherapy
Advantages
Disadvantages
Intracavitary: Evolution
CLASSICAL:
-
STOCKHOLM:
- Fractionated 226Ra
- 3#/1 month, each # ~20-30h
- Applicators:
- Intravaginal: Pb or Au
- Intrauterine: flexible rubber
- Unequal loading of uterus and
vagina
- Uterus: 30-90mg of radium
- Vagina: 60-80mg
- Dose = mg of 226Ra x hours
- Total dose ~ 6500-7100mg-h
- ~4500mg-h (vaginal
Intracavitary: Evolution
CLASSICAL:
-
PARIS:
- Single fraction of 226Ra inserted for 5 days
- Equal loading of uterus and vagina
- Applicators:
- Intravaginal: 2 cylindrical cork colopostats
- Intrauterine: tube
- Dose = 7000-8000mg-h
Intracavitary: Revolution
MANCHESTER (2D)
- Radiograph based treatment planning
- 1st system to define dosimetry related to reference points
- Calculate dose at a specified distance for particular
geometry
- Point A
Revolution:
- Standardize treatments
- Correlate dose to Point A with clinical results
Intracavitary: Manchester
Dose:
- Delivered in 2 #; using 226Ra
- Each session: 72 hours, Interval ~ 4-7 days (No
EBRT)
- < dose to point A from vaginal sources
- Uniform dose in treated volume
- Goal: dose variation < 10%
Applicators
- Rubber Tandem
- 2 ellipsoid ovoids
Loading Scheme:
- Create same dose rate irrespective of applicator
arrangement
- Non-uniform distribution of source strength
- Tandem: 10 +10+15 (long); 10+15 (medium), 20mg
(short) 226Ra
Point A, B
Point A
Point B
Intracavitary: ICRU 38
(1985)
Recommendations:
Point A
Located in region of high dose gradient
Result in larger uncertainties in absorbed doses at this point
Dose
60Gy dose volume (EBRT +brachytherapy)
Bladder Point
Posterior surface of foley ballon on lateral x-ray
Foley filled 7cm3 radiopaque fluid and pulled down against urethra
Rectal Point
5mm behind posterior vaginal wall between ovoids
at inferior point of last intrauterine tandem source or mid-vaginal
source
Point H
Why?
Difficult to see Point A on radiographs
Point A was in high dose gradient
Intracavitary: CT Planning
(3D)
Image-Based HDR
Brachytherapy Treatment
Why?
GTV CTV, PTV, OARs & use of DVHs standardized
Delineation of GTV, CTV and PTV and critical organs
impacts Brachytherapy planning
MRI soft tissue delineation!!
Diagnosis GTVD
Defined for each fraction i.e. GTVB1, GTVB2
Clinical exam at diagnosis & at BT
On MRI (T2-weighted sequence) at diagnosis & at BT
PDR:
36-40Gy at 60-80cGy/h
HDR:
30Gy in 5#
MR-HDR Brachytherapy
Implementing GEC-ESTR0
COSTS!
MRI dedicated for Radiation Oncology
OR time for EUA
MRI compatible tandems, ovoids/ring
TIME!
Dosimetrist
Physicist
Radiation Oncologist
Patient
Program in Evidence Based Care: The Delivery of Brachytherapy for Cervical Cancer
Organizational and Technical Advice to Facilitate High-Quality Care in Ontario
Program in Evidence Based Care: The Delivery of Brachytherapy for Cervical Cancer
Organizational and Technical Advice to Facilitate High-Quality Care in Ontario
Program in Evidence Based Care: The Delivery of Brachytherapy for Cervical Cancer
Organizational and Technical Advice to Facilitate High-Quality Care in Ontario
Program in Evidence Based Care: The Delivery of Brachytherapy for Cervical Cancer
Organizational and Technical Advice to Facilitate High-Quality Care in Ontario
EMBRACE
MRI guided BT in LACC
Prospective observational study
DVH parameters for clinical target volumes and OARs
with outcome
References
Dr. C. Joshis lecture notes
Clinical Radiation Oncology, 3rd Edition, 2007 Gunderson, L.
GEC-ESTRO
1.
2.
3.
i.
ii.
Cancer Care Ontario: Program in Evidence Based Care (PEBC) Radiation Therapy
4.
i.
EMBRACE
5.
i.
http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00920920