You are on page 1of 56

Vertical Alignment

CE 453 Lecture 20
Sources: A Policy on Geometric
Design of Highways and Streets
(The Green Book). Washington, DC.
American Association of State
Highway and Transportation
Officials, 2001 4th Edition, and
FHWAs Flexibility in Highway
Design

Coordination of Vertical and


Horizontal Alignment

Curvature and grade should be in


proper balance

Avoid
Excessive curvature to achieve flat grades
Excessive grades to achieve flat curvature

Vertical curvature should be


coordinated with horizontal
Sharp horizontal curvature should not
be introduced at or near the top of a
pronounced crest vertical curve
Drivers may not perceive change in

Image source:
http://www.webs1.uidaho.edu/niatt_labman
ual/Chapters/geometricdesign/theoryandco
ncepts/DescendingGrades.htm

horizontal alignment esp. at night

Coordination of Vertical and


Horizontal Alignment
Sharp

horizontal curvature should not


be introduced near bottom of steep
grade near the low point of a
pronounced sag vertical curve
Horizontal curves appear distorted
Vehicle speeds (esp. trucks) are highest

at the bottom of a sag vertical curve


Can result in erratic motion

Coordination of Vertical and


Horizontal Alignment
On

two-lane roads when passing is


allowed, need to consider provision of
passing lanes
Difficult to accommodate with certain

arrangements of horizontal and vertical


curvature
need long tangent sections to assure
sufficient passing sight distance
4

Coordination of Vertical and


Horizontal Alignment
At

intersections where sight distance needs


to be accommodated, both horizontal and
vertical curves should be as flat as practical
In residential areas, alignment should
minimize nuisance to neighborhood
Depressed highways are less visible
Depressed highways produce less noise
Horizontal alignments can increase the buffer

zone between roadway and cluster of homes

Coordination of Vertical and


Horizontal Alignment
When

possible alignment should


enhance scenic views of the natural
and manmade environment

Highway should lead into not away from

outstanding views
Fall towards features of interest at low
elevation
Rise towards features best seen from
below or in silhouette against the sky
6

Coordination of Horizontal and


Vertical Alignment
Coordination

of horizontal and vertical


alignment should begin with preliminary
design
Easier to make adjustments at this stage
Designer should study long, continuous
stretches of highway in both plan and
profile and visualize the whole in three
dimensions
7

Coordination of Horizontal and


Vertical Alignment

Coordination of Horizontal and


Vertical Alignment
Should

be consistent with the


topography
Preserve developed properties along
the road
Incorporate community values
Follow natural contours of the land
9

Good Coordination of Horizontal


and Vertical Alignment
Does

not affect
aesthetic, scenic,
historic, and cultural
resources along the way
Enhances attractive
scenic views

Rivers
Rock formations
Parks
Historic sites
Outstanding buildings

10

11

12

13

14

15

Vertical Curves
Connect

roadway grades (tangents)


Grade (rise over run)
10% grade increases 10 vertically for

every 100 horizontal

16

Vertical Curves
Ascending

grade:

Frequency of

collisions increases
significantly when
vehicles traveling
more than 10 mph
below the average
traffic speed are
present in the
traffic stream

17

Example
If

a highway with
traffic normally
running at 65 mph has
an inclined section
with a 3% grade, what
is the maximum
length of grade that
can be used before
the speed of the
larger vehicles is
reduced to 55 mph?
18

Example
a

3% grade
causes a
reduction in
speed of 10
mph after
1400 feet

19

Climbing lanes
When

flatter grades cannot be accommodated,


consider climbing lane when all 3 of the
following criteria are met (AASHTO):
Upgrade traffic flow rate in excess of 200 vehicles

per hour.
Upgrade truck flow rate in excess of 20 vehicles per
hour.
One of the following conditions exists:

A 15 km/h or greater speed reduction is expected for a


typical heavy truck.
Level-of-service E or F exists on the grade.
A reduction of two or more levels of service is experienced
when moving from the approach segment to the grade.

20

Descending Grades

Problem is increased speeds and loss of control


for heavy trucks
Runaway vehicle ramps are often designed and
included at critical locations along the grade
Ramps placed before each turn that cannot be
negotiated at runaway speeds
Ramps should also be placed along straight
stretches of roadway, wherever unreasonable
speeds might be obtained
Ramps located on the right side of the road when
possible
21

Maximum Grades
Passenger

vehicles can easily


negotiate 4 to 5% grade without
appreciable loss in speed
Upgrades: trucks average 7%
decrease in speed
Downgrades: trucks average speed
increase 5%
22

Vertical Curves

Parabolic shape
VPI, VPC, VPT, +/- grade, L
Types of crest and sag curves

23

Vertical Curves

Crest stopping, or passing sight distance


controls
Sag headlight/SSD distance, comfort,
drainage and appearance control
Green Book vertical curves defined by K =
L/A = length of vertical curve/difference
in grades (in percent) = length to change
one percent in grade

24

Vertical Curve Equations

Parabola
y = ax2 + bx + c
Where:
y = roadway elevation at distance x
x = distance from beginning of vertical
curve
a = G2 G1
L
b = G1
c = elevation of PVC

25

Vertical Curve AASHTO Controls


(Crest)

Minimum length must provide stopping


sight distance S
Two situations (both assume h1=3.5 and
h2=2.0)

Source: Transportation Engineering On-line Lab


Manual, http://www.its.uidaho.edu/niatt_labmanual/

26

Assistant with Target Rod (2ft object height)

Observer with
Sighting Rod (3.5
ft)

27

Vertical Curve AASHTO Controls


(Crest)

Note: for passing sight distance, use 2800


instead of 2158

28

Example: Try SSD > L,


Design speed is 60 mph
G1 = 3% and G2 = -1%,
what is L?
(Assume grade = 0% for SSD)
SSD = 570feet ( see: Table 3.4 of text)
Lmin = 2 (570) 2158 = 600.5
|(-1-3)|
S < L, so it doesnt match condition

29

Example: Assume SSD < L,


Design speed is 60 mph
G1 = 3% and G2 = -1%,
what is L?
Assuming average grade = 0%
SSD = 570 feet - ( Table 3.4 of text)
Lmin = |(-3 - 1)| (570 ft)2 = 602 ft
2158
SSD < L, equation matches condition

30

Evaluation of example:
The

AASHTO SSD distance equations


provided the same design length from either
equation in this special case. (600 compared
to 602 - this is not typical)
Garber and Hoel recommend using the most
critical grade of - 1% for SSD computation.
Resulting SSD would be: d = 573 ft
Resulting minimum curve: L = 608 ft

Difference

between 602 and 608 is too small


to worry about
31

Text example : g1 = + 3% g2 = -3%


Design speed of 60 mph
If SSD = 570 (AASHTO no grade
consideration)
Resulting minimum curve: L = 903 ft (S < L)
Consider grade per Garber and Hoel (p 693-694)
SSD, using - 3% grade,

598

Resulting minimum curve L = 994 ft


32

Assessment of grade adjustment

If sight distance is less than curve length, the driver


will be on an upgrade a greater portion of the distance
than on a down grade
(for eye ht = 3.5 and object ht = 2.0 ft, 68% of the
distance between eye and object will be on + grade.)
For crest vertical curve, selecting a curve length based
on down grade SSD may produce an overly conservative
design length.
33

AASHTO design tables


Vertical

curve length can also be found in


design tables

L = K *A
Where
K = length of curve per percent
algebraic difference in intersecting grade
Charts from Green Book
34

From Green book

35

From Green book

36

Vertical Curve AASHTO Controls


(Crest)
Since you do not at first know L, try
one of these equations and compare
to requirement, or use L = KA (see
tables and graphs in Green Book for a
given A and design speed)

37

Chart vs computed
From chart
V = 60 mph
For g1 = 3

K = 151 ft / % change

g2 = - 1

A = |g2 g1| = |-1 3| = 4


L = ( K * A) = 151 * 4 =

604
38

Sag Vertical Curves


Sight

distance is governed by nighttime conditions


Distance on curve illuminated by

headlights need to be considered

Driver

comfort
Drainage
General appearance
39

Vertical Curve AASHTO Controls (Sag)


Headlight Illumination sight distance
S < L:

L=

AS2
400 + (3.5 * S)

S > L:

L = 2S (400 + 3.5S)
A

40

Vertical Curve AASHTO Controls (Sag)

For driver comfort use:


L > AV2
46.5
(limits g force to 1 fps/s)

To consider general appearance use:


L > 100 A
41

Sag Vertical Curve: Example


A sag vertical curve is to be designed to join a 3% to a
+3% grade. Design speed is 40 mph. What is L?
Skipping steps: SSD = 313.67 feet

S>L

Determine whether S<L or S>L


L = 2(313.67 ft) (400 + 2.5 x 313.67) = 377.70 ft
[3 (-3)]
313.67 < 377.70, so condition does not apply

42

Sag Vertical Curve: Example


A sag vertical curve is to be designed to join a 3%
to a +3% grade. Design speed is 40 mph. What is
L?
Skipping steps: SSD = 313.67 feet
L=

6 x (313.67)2

= 394.12 ft

400 + 3.5 x 313.67


313.67 < 394.12, so condition applies

43

Sag Vertical Curve: Example


A sag vertical curve is to be designed to join a 3%
to a +3% grade. Design speed is 40 mph. What is L?
Skipping steps: SSD = 313.67 feet
Testing for comfort:
L = AV2 = (6 x [40 mph]2) = 206.5 feet

46.5

46.5

Testing for appearance:


L = 100A = (100 x 6) = 600 feet
44

Vertical Curve AASHTO Controls (Sag)

For curb drainage, want min. of 0.3


percent grade within 50 of low point
= need Kmax = 167 (US units)

For appearance on high-type roads,


use min design speed of 50 mph (K =
100)
As in crest, use min L = 3V

45

Other important issues:


Use

lighting if need to use shorter L


than headlight requirements
Sight distance at under crossings

46

47

Example: A crest vertical curve joins a +3% and 4% grade.


Design speed is 75 mph. Length = 2184.0 ft. Station at VPI is
345+ 60.00, elevation at VPI = 250 feet. Find elevations and
station for VPC (BVC) and VPT (EVC).
L/2 = 1092.0 ft
Station at VPC = [345 + 60.00] - [10 + 92.00] = 334 + 68.00
Vertical Diff VPI to VPC: -0.03 x (2184/2) = - 32.76 feet
ElevationVPC = 250 32.76 = 217.24 feet
Station at VPT = [345 + 60.00] + [10 + 92.00] = 357 + 52.00
Vertical Diff VPI to VPT = -0.04 x (2184/2) = - 43.68 feet
Elevation VPT = 250 43.68 = 206.32 feet
48

Example: A crest vertical curve joins a +3% and 4%


grade. Design speed is 75 mph. Length = 2184.0 ft.
Station at VPI is 345+ 60.00, elevation at VPI = 250
feet. Station at VPC (BVC) is 334 + 60.00, Elevation
at VPC: 217.24 feet.
Calculate points along the vertical curve.
X = distance from VPC
Y=

Ax2
200 L

Elevationtangent = elevation at VPC + distance x grade


Elevationcurve = Elevationtangent - Y
49

Example: A crest vertical curve joins a +3% and


4% grade. Design speed is 75 mph. Length =
2184.0 ft. Station at VPI is 345+ 60.00,
elevation at VPI = 250 feet. Find elevation on
the curve at a point 400 feet from VPC.
Y=Ax

200L

= - 7 x (400 ft)2 = - 2.56 feet


200 (2814)

Elevation at tangent = 206.32 + (400 x 0.03) =


218.32
Elevation on curve = 218.32 2.56 feet = 226.68
50

Calculating x from VPC, calculating tangent


elevation along +3% tangent

51

52

Calculating x from VPT, calculating tangent


53
elevation along +4% tangent

Source: Iowa DOT


Design Manual

54

55

Source: Iowa DOT Design Manual

Note: L is measured from here to here


Source: Iowa
DOT Design
Manual

Not here

56

You might also like