Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ADVISORY SERVICES
Voice Of
The Customer
Voice Of
The Employee
Voice Of
The Shareholder
Business Big Ys
Process
Ys
Y
Y
Y
Y
Project Y
X1
X2
X3
Any parameters
that influence
the Y
Strong
StrongLinkage
Linkagebetween
betweenProjects
Projects&&Big
BigYs
YsisisImportant
Important
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
Gather VOC
Identify customer
segments
that need to be
targeted
Customers
CustomersRequirements
Requirementsdetermines
determinesquantifiable
quantifiableProcess
ProcessMetrics
MetricsCTQ
CTQ
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
Gather VOC
Identify customer
segments
that need to be
targeted
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
Easy
Process
Availability
Personal
Interface
Advice/
Consulting
Low Interest
Rate
Easy
Application
Will Come To
My Facility
Knowledgeable
Reps
Knows About
My Finances
Variable Terms
Easy Access
To Capital
Available
Outside
Normal
Business
Hours
Professional
Knows About
My Business
All Charges
Clearly Stated
Pay Back
When I Want
No
Prepayment
Penalties/
Charges
Pre-Approved
Credit
Quick
Decision
Can Apply
Over Phone
Know Status
Of Loan During
Application
Know Status
Of Loan (PostApproval)
Available
When I Need
To Talk
Friendly
Make Me Feel
Comfortable
Patient During
Process
Responsive
To My Calls
Cares About
My Business
Has Access To
Experts
Provides
Answers To
Questions
Talk To
One Person
Calls If
Problems Arise
Preference If
Bank Customer
Verbatim VOC
Makes Finance
Suggestions
High-Level Needs
Organize
OrganizeVOC
VOCinto
intobroad
broadcategories
categories
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
VOC
Identify customer
segments
that need to be
targeted
CTQs
Translate to needs
statement
& develop a CTQ Project Y metric output
characteristic
Customers
CustomersRequirements
Requirementsdetermines
determinesquantifiable
quantifiableProcess
ProcessMetrics
MetricsCTQ
CTQ
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
Verbatim
- Quick Response
Specific
Needs
Validate
CTQ
with customer
CTQs
What
Whatgets
getsmeasured
measuredgets
getsmanaged
managedensure
ensuremeasurable
measurableCTQs
CTQs
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
SHAREHOLDERS &
COMPLIANCE
EMPLOYEES
CUSTOMERS
PROJECT CTQ
INTEGRITY OF
COMMUNICATIONS
INTERNAL UPSTREAM /
DOWNSTREAM
CUSTOMERS
BUSINESS PROCESS
EFFECTIVENESS
CONTROLLERSHIP
& BUSINESS
STRATEGY
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
Innovation
One-Dimensional
Competitive Priority
Free upgrades
Individual movies and games
Special staf
attention/services
Computer plug-ins (power
sources)
Seat comfort
Quality of refreshments
Friendliness of staf
Baggage speed
On-Time arrival
Dysfunctional
Functional
Must Be
Critical Priority
Dissatisfaction
Safe arrival
Accurate booking
Baggage arrives with
passenger
99% system uptime
Kano
KanoModel
Modelhelps
helpsto
toprioritize
prioritizeour
oureforts
efortstowards
towardssatisfying
satisfyingcustomers
customers
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
10
The Kano theory helps prioritize teams improvement efforts after needs & CTQs have
been established. The team should refrain from translating CTQs to the Kano Model but
rather have customer VOC verify where the need / CTQ should feature using the model
For some customer needs, customer satisfaction is proportional to the extent to which
the product or service is fully functional
The horizontal axis indicates how fully functional a product/service is; and the vertical
axis indicates customer satisfaction
It is to be expected over a period of product life cycle that (the product) could shift from
being a Delighter to a One Dimensional to a Must - Be (e.g., invention of TV)
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
11
Increased Capacity
Improved product quality/service
Improved commercial processes
Decreased Cost
Reduced Rework
Increased Labor efficiency
Reduced Operating expenses (fixed and variable costs)
Reduced Plant and equipment depreciation or lease expense
Projects
Projectscan
canfocus
focuson
onHard
HardGains
Gainsor
orSoft
Softgains
gains
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
12
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
13
Contents
Define
Customer Expectations of the process?
Measure
What is the frequency of defects?
Analyze
Why, Where & When do defects occur?
Improve
How can we fix the Process?
Control
How can we keep the process fixed?
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
14
Define
Customer Expectations of the Organization
Contents - Define
1
CHARTER
Business Case
Problem & Goal Statement
Project Scope
Milestones
Roles & Responsibility
4
Deliverables:
Deliverables:
CTQs
CTQsIdentified
Identified Charter
Charter SIPOC
SIPOC
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
16
Charter
A Charter:
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
17
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
18
CTQ:
Accuracy
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
19
Process Ys
Does project Y
link to business Ys?
Business
BusinessCase
Case/ /
Benefits
Benefits
Problem /
Opportunity
Statement
Goal
Statement
Project
Scope
Key Milestones /
Timelines / Detailed Plan
Milestone /
Project Plan
Resources /
Team Members
Roles
Start with a verb (e.g., reduce, eliminate, control, increase) Who are the key resources ?
Focus of project (cycle time, accuracy, etc.)
What will be the roles of BBs /
Target (by 50%, by 75%)
GBs / Sponsor / MBBs
Deadline
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
20
Project Scope
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
21
Draw a large square picture frame on a flip chart (or use tape on a wall) and use
this metaphor to help the team identify what falls inside the picture of their project
and what falls out. This may be in terms of scope, goals, and roles
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
22
A collection of activities that takes one or more inputs and transforms them into
outputs that are of value to the customer
Outputs
Customer(s)
Supplier(s)
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
23
CTQs
CTQs
Suppliers
Inputs
Process
Outputs
Customers
Measures
Measures
Process
Map
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
24
Boundary: The limits of a particular process, that define the start and stop points
of the process
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
25
Credit
Ops
Core Process
(Level I)
Messaging
Payments
Trades
Exports
Subprocesses
(Level 2)
Negotiation
Subprocesses
(Level 3)
Payments
Billing
Imports
Collections
Microprocesses
(Level 4 & Below)
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
26
Process
Inputs
Outputs Customer
s
CTQs
Define business process to be reviewed name it agree on beginning and end of process
bound it.
Refer to CTQ work to identify primary outputs, the customers who receive them, and the
customers CTQs
Write large
Use brainstorming and affinity techniques to identify critical inputs which affect the quality of
the process
27
G.R.P.I
G.R.P.I. Check List - This tool is based on a simple model for team formation. It
challenges the team to consider four critical and interrelated aspects of
teamwork:
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
28
G.R.P.I
Uses: An excellent organizing tool for newly-formed teams or for teams that have
been underway for a while, but who have never taken time to look at their
teamwork.
Ideally, this tool should be used at one of the first team meetings. It can and
should be updated as the project unfolds.
Steps:
Distribute copies of the check list to all team members prior to a team meeting. Invite
team members to add details/examples on each of the four dimensions of the check list.
Ask each team member to bring his/her completed checklist to the team meeting.
At the team meeting discuss and resolve issues related to the check list.
Share certain aspects with Champion/Functional Leader if appropriate.
OPTION: When there is considerable disagreement or tension within the team
environment, team members can choose to complete the questionnaire individually and
turn it in to a neutral party who will collate the data and give it back to the team in an
aggregate fashion (thus protecting the anonymity of individual team members).
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
29
G.R.P.I
Expanded Version of the Tool: Useful when a more detailed look at team elements
is required.
How would you rate the degree to which your team presently has CLARITY,
AGREEMENT and EFFECTIVENESS on the following GRPI-related elements?
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
30
G.R.P.I
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
31
Great Project
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
32
Project Selection
Success Factors
To be successful
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
33
Project Selection
Common Pitfalls
Avoiding Pitfalls
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
34
Define Deliverables
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
35
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
36
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
37
Measure
Quantification of problem and causes
Measure
1
SELECT PROJECT Y
Measures
CTQ Prioritization
Types of Data
Fishbone Diagram2
DEVELOP DATA COLLECTION PLAN
Establish Data collection
Plan
Define Operational
Definitions
Define Sampling
3
Procedures
Measurement System
Analysis
VARIATION
Display & Describe Variation
Causes of Variation
Run Chart
Bar Chart
Normal Curve
Deliverables:
Deliverables:
Data
DataCollection
CollectionPlan
Plan
MSA
MSAResults
Results
Data
DataPlots
Plots
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
39
Select Project Y
Example :
Big Ys
VOC
CTQs
Process CTQs/
Process Metrics
Project CTQ/
Project Ys
Employer
of Choice
Retention Rate
Attrition %
Essential
Essentialto
tovalidate
validatethe
thelinkage
linkagebetween
betweenProject
ProjectCTQ,
CTQ,Process
ProcessCTQs
CTQs&&Big
BigYs
Ys
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
40
Select Project Y
The foundation of the measure phase as the name suggests lies in the data
collection plan keeping the target of the project, process and business in mind
The above steps have an inherent linkage in the sense that it would enable us to
cross check if our project CTQ is aligned to the process output characteristic
The process output characteristic can than be rolled up into process and
business metric
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
41
Understanding Measures
Measure : Any element relating to the process under study which is operationally
definable & quantifiable. Measures can be understood better by classifying them
in the following ways:
Classificati
on of
Measures
Based on SIPOC
Based on Focus
Based on
Statistics
Input
Efficiency
Continuous
Process
Efectiveness
Discrete
Output
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
42
Based on SIPOC
INPUT
PROCESS
How good is my
process
OUTPUT
Timely??
Accurate?
?
Productive??
43
Based on SIPOC
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
44
Based on Focus
Measures for looking at Process Performance
Customer Focussed
Process Focussed
Effectiveness
The degree to which customer
CTQs are met and exceeded
Examples
Percent Defective
Response Time
Billing Accuracy
Efficiency
The amount of resources allocated
in meeting and exceeding
customer CTQs
Examples
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
45
Based on Statistics
Continuum of Data Types
Discrete
Binary
Description
Example
Classified
into one of
two categories
Continuous
Ordered
categories
Rankings
or ratings
Count
Counted
discretely
Measured
on a continuous
scale
Actual distance
traveled by each
in this group
measured in Kms
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
46
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
47
Based on Statistics
Points to Remember:
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
48
The Cost Benefit Ratio for the data collection should be justifiable
The measure should be relevant to the process
A clear Operational definition of the measure has been agreed upon by all Stakeholders
The measure and subsequent data collection should enable analysis, evaluations and
actions
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
49
Material
Or use 4
Ps
Method
Changes made in
operational data
Write the
efect here
Printer Problem
Printing not clear
Machine
Measurement
Absenteeism
Man
Mother
nature
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
50
What
Where
When &
How Much
Minitab Software helps you to generate the template of a Fish-Bone Diagram. You
can draw a blank diagram, or a diagram filled in as much as you like. Although
there is no "correct" way to construct a fishbone diagram, some types lend
themselves well to many different situations.
Menu Pull-Down Sequence
Stat > Quality Tools > Cause-and-Effect
in Minitab
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
51
Why collect
Data?
The
purpose of
the Data
Collection
exercise
What to
Collect ?
Identify
Measure
Define
Operational
Definitions
What Data
to be
collected
How to
Collect?
Ensure
Consistency &
Stability
Formulate
Data
Collection
Plan
Develop
Measurement
System
Analysis
Sampling
Strategy
Test and
Validate
Pilot Data
Collection
Plan
Collect
Data
Pilot
Collection
and
Validation
Plan
Train Data
Collectors
Monitor and
Improvise
Word
Wordof
ofCaution
Caution::Wrong
WrongData
DataLeads
Leadsto
toWrong
WrongConclusions
Conclusions
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
52
Data collection occurs multiple times throughout DMAIC. The data collection plan
described here can be used as the guide for data collection. This help us ensure
that we collect useful, accurate data that is needed to answer our process
questions
It is important to be clear about the data collection goals to ensure the right data
is collected. If your data is in the wrong form or format, you may not be able to
use it in your analysis
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
53
A format of an excel spread sheet that can be used for data collection plans for
our projects. The sample data collection plan above is for the Project CTQ, in this
example, Number of Rejections.
However one should remember that based on C-E Diagram and the SIPOC all
those Xs which the team feels to have a influence over the Y should also be
included in the data collection plan.
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
54
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
55
Sampling
Sampling is a process of collecting a portion or a sub-set of the total data available. This
total data available or could be available is often referred to as population. The sample
so drawn up from the population should help us to draw conclusions about the
population.
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
56
Sampling
The Six Sigma team would always face a question How much data do we need
to have a valid sample? Though an important part of data collection is to obtain a
sample of reasonable size, it is one of many questions to be addressed during the
planning and development of a data collection strategy. Sample size is just one
aspect of a valid data collection activity
The validity of the data is impacted by many things for example, operational
definitions, data collection procedures and recording
What are the key considerations for either a process or population situation?
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
57
Sampling
When to sample?
The subset of data so collected may not be truly representative of the population thus
leading to a wrong conclusion (every unit is unique e.g., structured deals or auctioning
events)
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
58
Types of Sampling
Types of Sampling
Non
Random/Judgmental
The
groups knowledge and
Random /
All
items in the population
Probability
have an equal chance of
getting selected
Examples:
Examples:
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
59
Process Data
Population
Data
Process Approach
Population Approach
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
60
Process
Systematic
Sampling
Measurement of AC
Room Temperature.
Collect one data point
every 1 hour for the
entire day.
Population
Rational Subgrouping
Stratified
Random
Sampling
Random
Sampling
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
61
For example, the manager of a billing center is using systematic sampling to monitor
processing rates. At random times around each hour five consecutive bills are selected
and the processing time measured
Like random samples, stratified random samples are used in population sampling
situations, when reviewing historical or batch data
Stratified random sampling is used when the population has different groups
(strata) and we need to ensure that those groups are fairly represented in the
sample. In stratified random sampling, independent samples are drawn from each
group. The size of each sample is proportional to the relative size of the group
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
62
Rational Subgrouping
The Process
12noon to 12.20pm
12.45pm to 1pm
1.20pm to 1.45pm
Sample
Subgroup of
samples
Points to Remember
Monitor process frequently enough to catch it in various phases of operation
Several small subgroups to be measured at different points in time
Higher frequency of measurements for an unstable & unpredictable process
The frequency can be lowered in case of a stable process
Processes working on lower Turn Around Time need a higher Frequency and vise versa
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
63
Rational Subgrouping
Rational sub grouping is typically used in process sampling situations when data
is collected real time during process operations. It involves grouping
measurements produced under similar conditions, sometimes called short-term
variation. This type of grouping assists in understanding the sources of variation
between subgroups, sometimes called long-term variation
Sub grouping over time is the most common approach; sub grouping can be done
by other suspected sources of variation (e.g., location, customer, supplier, etc)
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
64
Sampling Bias
Sampling Bias
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
65
The Team needs to be sure of the adequate representation of the population with the
sample chosen
The term used for the same is Level of confidence which increases with an increase
in the sample size
Precision ()
How accurate is the result as a deduction from the samplewhat is the level of
accuracy needed in my samplewhat kind of process are we dealing with
Sample
SampleSize
Sizeisisnot
notdependent
dependenton
onthe
thePopulation
PopulationSize
Size
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
66
ZC
1.96 (s)
What do we infer??
(ZC) (s)
The measured
value can lie
between these
limits
Target Value
The Six Sigma Team can thus infer that the mean for the population lies within m
95% confidence - For service industry purposes we will use 95% confidence Interval
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
with
67
(ZC)
p (1-p)
1.96
p (1-p)
What do we infer??
Proportion Defective -
Proportion
Defective
that
the population
The measured
value can lie
between these
limits
Proportion
Defective +
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
68
TOTAL VARIANCE
Apparent variation = Process variation + Measurement
variation
Double Challenge:
Reduce variation in both processes!
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
69
Terms of MSA
Accuracy
Repeatability
Reproducibility
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
70
GRR Example
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
71
GRR Example
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
72
GRR Example
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
73
GRR Example
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
74
R&R over 30% - Not acceptable. Find problem, re-visit the Fishbone Diagram, remove
Root Causes. Is there a better gage on the market, is it worth the additional cost?
< 2 - no value for process control, parts all look the same
= 2 - can see two groupshigh/low, good/bad
= 3 - can see three groupshigh/mid/low
4 or more acceptable measurement system (higher is better)
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
75
AAA - Example
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
76
AAA - Example
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
77
AAA - Example
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
78
shows you the consistency of each operator's answers. For each appraiser, the graph
consists of the following:
Blue circle, which provides the actual percent matched
Red line, which provides a 95.0% confidence interval for percent matched
Blue cross and blue X, which provide the lower and upper limits for the 95.0%
confidence interval, respectively.
If you have a known standard for each part, then the percent matched between appraiser
and standard is plotted.
The Appraiser versus Standard Assessment Agreement graph shows you the
correctness of each operator's answers. For each appraiser, the graph consists of the
following:
Blue circle, which provides the actual percent matched
Red line, which provides a 95.0% confidence interval for percent matched
Blue cross and blue X, which provide the lower and upper limits for the 95.0%
confidence interval, respectively
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
79
Kappa
If kappa = 1, then there is perfect agreement. If kappa = 0, then agreement is the same as
would be expected by chance. The higher the value of kappa, the stronger the agreement
between rating and standard. Negative values occur when agreement is weaker than
expected by chance, but this rarely happens. Depending on the application, kappa less than
0.7 indicates the measurement system needs improvement. Kappa values above 0.9 are
considered excellent.
Kendall's
Use the p-values to choose between two opposing hypotheses, based on your sample data:
H0: There is no association among multiple ratings made by an appraiser
H1:The ratings are associated with one another
The p-value provides the likelihood of obtaining your sample, with its particular Kendall's
coefficient of concordance, if the null hypothesis (H0) is true. If the p-value is less than or
equal to a predetermined level of significance (a-level), then you reject the null hypothesis
and claim support for the alternative hypothesis.
Alternate hypothesis is good here as you are trying to judge if the match is due to chance or
significant match
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
80
When your classifications are ordinal and you have a known standard for each
trial, in addition to kappa statistics, use Kendall's correlation coefficient.
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
81
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
82
PERCENTAGE
INPUT ERROR
PROCEDURE
Pie Chart
OTHERS
160
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
30
UCL=30.00
20
Mean=15
10
0
Subgroup
Errors
commited
LCL=3.68E-04
0
10
20
30
20
Not updated
62%
No. of errors
Discrete
Data
OMISSION
18%
UCL=18.43
10
R=5.640
0
LCL=0
Error fields
Bar Chart
Frequency
Run Chart
Time
Box Plot
Measurement
Frequency Diagram
30
UCL=30.00
20
Mean=15
10
0
Subgroup
LCL=3.68E-04
0
10
20
Continuous
Data
Measurement
Histogram
20
30
UCL=18.43
10
R=5.640
0
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
LCL=0
83
Characteristics of Data
Characteristics of data
Dispersion
(Variation)
Central Tendency
Mean
A set of Data points can be compared and interpreted based on their Central
Tendency and Variation.
Median
Mode
Quartile Values
Standard Deviation
(SD)
Range
Span
Stability Factor
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
84
Central Tendency
Consider the time taken for people to withdraw Cash (including queue time) from
two different ATM counters. Which Counter is better !!
Counter 1 Counter 2
10
10
12
12
13
13
9
9
8
8
7
7
8
8
10
100
14
14
10.11
20.11
10
10
Mean
Median
Median is not
affected by
the presence
of extreme
values
Mode
Mean
The arithmetic
average
The positioning of
the data set helps
determine median
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
85
Dispersion
Standard Deviation
Extreme 5% observations
on either side can be
discounted
Range
Span
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
86
Normal Curve
Frequency
20
10
0
45
50
55
Menu Pull-Down
Sequence
in Minitab
Stat > Basic Statistics > Display Descriptive Statistics > Graphs
87
Normal Curve
34.13%
34.13%
13.60%
2.14%
2.14%
13.60%
0.13%
-3s
0.13%
-2s
-1s
0
68.26%
95.46
%
99.73%
+1s
+2s
+3s
Percentage of Data
getting covered under
the curve
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
88
Normality Plot
The minitab output of normality plot for a data set
Normal Probability Plot
.999
.99
Probability
.95
.80
.50
.20
.05
.01
P-Value
Determines
the normality
of the data
.001
24.8
25.8
26.8
27.8
28.8
29.8
30.8
31.8
32.8
33.8
C1
Average: 29.9371
StDev: 1.72224
N: 90
Menu Pull-Down
Sequence in Minitab
89
Frequency
Exponential Curve
20
4
3
Exponential Distribution
10
Percent
2
1
0
90
0
12
13
14
15
16
17
10
20
30
50
60
70
80
18
S curve
Bimodal curve
Bimodal Distribution
Frequency
3
2
99
3
99
95
95
90
90
0
7
11
13
15
17
19
21
23
80
70
60
50
40
30
80
Percent
Percent
Frequency
40
0
7
20
11
13
15
17
19
21
23
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
10
1
0
10
20
30
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
10
20
90
30
Types of Distribution
The Shape of the distribution depicted by the data can be studied with the help of
a histogram or more precisely with Normal Probability Plot
Roughly Normal Distribution
Exponential Distribution
20
Frequency
6
5
4
3
10
2
1
0
0
12
13
14
15 16
17
18
19
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Bimodal Distribution
6
Frequency
Frequency
5
4
3
2
1
0
7
11 13 15 17 19 21 23
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
91
Quartile Value
Q1
Q3
Aims at dividing the data set in 4 quartiles and measuring the range in each
subsequently
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
92
Stability Factor
The stability factor (SF) is the ratio of the first quartile and third quartile values. The
formula for Stability Factor is:
SF = Q1/Q3
The stability factor is interpreted such that the closer SF is to 1, the less variation there
is in the process. The further SF is from 1, the more
variation there exists in the process
Q1
Q3
Q1
Q1
Q3
Q3
<1
0 More Variation
More
Variation
Q1
Q3
Less
Variation
Less Variation 1
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
93
Box Plot
*
*
*
Outlier
Highest Value
Each segment
represents
25% of the
data points
Median
First Quartile (25%) value
Lowest Value
Box
BoxPlot
Plotisisanother
anothertool
toolto
tovisually
visuallydisplay
displayprocess
processdispersion
dispersion
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
94
Box Plot
Box Plots are graphical summaries of the patterns of variation in sets of data
The horizontal lines at the top and bottom of the plot represent the highest and
lowest values beyond which the data becomes an outlier. The horizontal line in
the middle of the solid box represents the median, and the solid box represents
the middle 50% of the data, with 25% of the data on the top side of the box and
25% of the data on the bottom side of the box
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
95
Descriptive Statistics
Descriptive Statistics
Variable: Processing Cycle
Time
Anderson-Darling Normality Test
A-Squared:
P-Value:
45
47
49
51
53
55
57
Mean
StDev
Variance
Skewness
Kurtosis
N
Minimum
1st Quartile
Median
3rd Quartile
Maximum
0.836
0.030
50.4118
2.2972
5.27718
0.424275
0.339406
100
44.7533
48.9910
50.0208
51.8229
56.5353
50.3
50.8
2.0170
95% Confidence Interval for Median
50.8676
50.5014
Descriptive Statistics can be run on Minitab. The result will be shown as above.
One would be able to get information on Normality of the data, visual display of
data ( Normal curve), Box Plot, outliers, Mean, Median, Standard Deviation,
Menu Pull-Down
Quartile values.
Sequence
Stat > Basic Statistics > Display Descriptive Statistics
in Minitab
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
96
Run Chart
A tool used to depict the behavior of the process under investigation over a period
Parameter
of time
Median
Time
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
97
Trend
Cycle / Oscillation
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
98
Run Charts
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
99
Run Charts
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
100
Causes of Variations
Type of Variation
Common Cause
Characteristics
Characteristics
Inherent to the
process
Expected
Predictable
Normal
Random
Unexpected
Unpredictable
Not Normal
Not Random
To distinguish between common & special causes variation, use display tools that
study variation over time such as run charts & control charts.
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
101
Analyze
Confer the assumption
Analyze
1 PROCESS CAPABILITY
Base lining
DPMO/DPU
Cp/Cpk
Calculate Sigma
Regression Analysis
Estimate of Benefit
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
103
Scrap
Step 1
10 Units
Step 2
10 Units
Step 3
70 Units
10 Units
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
104
10 Units
10 Units
10 Units
100 Units
Step 1
Step 2
Step 3
Scrap
10 Units
10 Units
70 Units
10 Units
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
105
HIDDEN FACTORY
Rework
Operation
Verify
Product
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
106
100 Units
10 Units
Step 1
10 Units
90 Units
Scrap 10 Units
Step 2
80 Units
10 Units
10 Units
= 30 Units
Step 3
= 100 Units
10 Units
FTY 90 %
FTY 88.9 %
FTY 87.5 %
TPY 80 %
TPY 77.8 %
TPY 75.0 %
RTY .80
RTY .778
RTY .75
= 30 Units
FTY 70 %
= 46.7 %
107
100 Units
10 Units
10 Units
Scrap10 Units
10 Units
10 Units
= 30 Units
How much is
= 100 Units this
performance
level costing
= 30 Units us
FTY 90 %
FTY 88.9 %
TPY 80 %
TPY 77.8 %
TPY 75.0 %
RTY .80
RTY .778
Where should
we focus to
improve the
process
= 46.7 %
RTY .
75
Probability of Zero Defects
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
108
Sigma Calculation
Percentage
99.99966%
3.4
99.9770%
230
99.3790%
6,210
93.320%
66,800
69.20%
308,000
Process Sigma
(Z ST)
109
Common Terms
Defect: Any event that does not meet the specifications of a CTQ
Defect Opportunity: Any event which can be measured that provides a chance of
not meeting a customer requirement
Dashboard: Graphical representation of process Measures providing a snapshot
of process health
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
110
Sigma Calculation
D
N*O
D
x 1,000,000
N*O
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
111
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
112
The Statistical Problem can be deduced from the data by concentrating our efforts
in 2 Directions
Are we
missing on
achieving
the Target
Mean??
OR
Is the
problem
around the
variations
??
Six
SixSigma
SigmaChallenge.
Challenge.Center
CenterMean
Meanand/or
and/orReduce
Reducevariation
variation
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
113
LSL
Target
Target
Reduce the process variation (control case)
USL
LSL
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
114
Process Capability
Process capability is a simple tool which helps us determine if a process, given its natural
variation, is capable of meeting the customer requirements or specifications
A stable process can be represented by a measure of its variation - six standard deviations
Comparing six standard deviations of the process variations to customer specifications
derives Process Capability
Cp : Process Capability
USL : Upper Specification Limit
Cp = USL - LSL
6
While Cp looks at the spread of variation it DOES NOT look at how well the process is
centered to the target value
Stat > Quality Tools > Capability Analysis (Normal)
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
115
Process Capability
Upper Spec
Limit
Lower Spec
Limit
Cp<1
Cp=1
Cp>1
-3 -2 -1
+1 +2 +3
Process Variation
exceeds Specification
in this case. Process
is producing
Defectives
Process is just about
meeting the
specification but
Centering needs
attention from the six
sigma team
Process Variation well
under control. Keep a
check on the
centering of the
process
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
116
Other Indices
But we can definitely estimate the process capability in terms of centricity...
The indices of Cpl and Cpu (for single sided specification limits)
or
Cpu = USL- X
3s
3s
Cpk is considered a measure of process capability and is taken as the smaller of either Cpl or Cpu
can then be estimated
Cpk = min (Cpl , Cpu )
117
HIGH
The Difficult
Piece
Use Change
Management
Strategy
Target it
Why
wait???
now
!!!
Just Do it
LOW
IMPACT
LOW
HIGH
IN OUR CONTROL
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
118
Prioritization Steps
Using the Control/Impact Matrix shown above, examine each X in light of two
questions:
With your team, place each X in the appropriate box on the matrix
Use process data to verify or disprove your assertions
The validated matrix is a guide used to addressing the Xs. Begin with the High
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
119
Segmentation
A process used to divide a large group of data into smaller, logical categories for
analysis.
Segmentation is commonly used by us in our day to day business to understand
and interpret information
Stratification
Unlike segmentation, stratification involves the uses data rather than just
information. Values of the Central Tendency and Dispersion are used to stratify
the given data set.
Example : Stratification of the customers based on the business volumes they provide us
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
120
Segmentation Tools
Pie Charts
No. of errors
160
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
Bar
Charts
Error fields
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
121
Pareto Chart
180
April 1 June 30
160
80
f* of D+B
70
120
f* of D
100
60
80
50
60
40
40
30
20
0
Type of Defect
Cumulative
Summation Line
(Cum Sum line)
90
f* of D+B+F
140
Frequency
100
Other
Cumulative Percentage
200
LEGEND
A: Typographical Errors
B: Incomplete Info
C: Sign not verified
D: Illegible
E: Process understanding
F: Poor Scan Quality
20
10
122
Pareto Chart
A fully documented Pareto chart will include the Cumulative Summation line or
Cum Sum line, which depicts the running total of the frequency of each
subsequent bar (stratification level). The right- hand axis on the graph will show
the cumulative percent of defects. By reading the Cum Sum line against the
cumulative percentage, your team can determine which of the stratification levels
comprise 80% of total for the problem, and direct their attention to those levels
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
123
Pareto Chart
Pareto Chart can be used in the Define Phase to narrow-down the scope of the
project and focus on key-factors if historical data available
Pareto Chart be used the Measure and Analyze Phase to analyzing the data
gathered to identify which are the 20 % Root-causes which cause 80 % of the
Effect
Pareto Chart should not be used in series repeatedly on the same set of causes
as this will reduce the focus area to 80 % of 80 % or 80 %.
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
124
Process Mapping
Points to Remember:
People who work on the process know it the best. Involve people who know
(focus on) the As Is Process
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
125
Process Mapping
Now, you will look in more detail at the sub processes defined in the SIPOC map.
Sub process maps provide specifics on the process flow that you can then
analyze using several useful techniques. Choose what to sub process map by
determining which of the major steps in the SIPOC have the biggest impact on the
output (Ys). The block (or blocks) selected is the one on which you create a sub
process map using it to understand how and why it impacts the output
If the output is a time measure, which of the blocks consumes the largest portion of total
time, or which one has the most variation or delays?
If the output is a cost measure, which of the blocks adds the most cost?
If the output is a function measure, which block has the most errors or problems?
Like working with a puzzle, you begin to assemble the pieces of an area on which
it makes sense to focus our efforts
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
126
Core Process
Business Process
SIPOC
Suppliers
(ext.) Customers
(int.) Cust.
Service Dept.
Procedures
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
127
Here are some guidelines on building a sub process map. These are not absolute
but they should help you avoid some of the pitfalls of process mapping:
Focus on As Is To find out why problems are occurring in a process, you need to
concentrate on how its working now
Clarify Boundaries If youre working from a well-done high level map, this should be
easy. If not, youll need to clarify start and stop points
Brainstorm Steps Its usually much easier to identify the steps before you try to build
the map
Starting each step description with a verb (e.g., Collate Orders; Review Credit Data)
helps you focus on action in the process
Who does the step is best left in parentheses (or left out) you want to avoid equating a
person with the process step
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
128
functional map/flowchart
No
Yes
1.0
2.0
Determin
e Party
Size
Find
Location
1.1
2.1
Decide
on
Budget
1.2
Decide
Theme
Decide
on Guest
list
Select
Location
2.2
Deployment Or cross-
3.0
Invite
Guests
3.1
Complet
e
Invitation
s
3.2
Send
Invitation
s
Dept 1
Dept 2
Dept
Creates
List
Writes
invitation
Yes
Is the
Guest List
covered
Sends out
the invitation
No
Completes
List
Invitation task
completed
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
129
LEAN
Muda means waste, where waste is any activity that does not add value. Reducing
or eliminating muda is, of course, one of the fundamental objectives of any
quality-oriented person.
Defects
Overproduction
Inventories
Unnecessary processing
Unnecessary movement of people
Unnecessary transport of goods
Waiting
Designing goods and services that done meet customers needs
Muda is one of the '3Ms': muda, or waste, mura, meaning irregular, uneven or
inconsistent, and muri, meaning unreasonable or excessive strain.
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
130
Types of Waste
Type of waste
Example
Complexity
Labor
Overproduction
Producing more than the customer demands. Producing before the customer needs it
Space
Storage for inventory, parts awaiting disposition, parts awaiting rework and scrap storage.
Excessively wide aisles. Other wasted space
Energy
Defects
Materials
Idle materials
Time
Waste of time
Transportation
Safety Hazards
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
131
Data Input
App waiting in
the queue
Rechecking
Developmental
Training
Processing
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
132
Value-enabling may be tasks and steps that are still needed given todays
condition. Consider what it would be like if things were perfect.
REs usually cause you to loop back to an earlier point in your process
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
133
5 hrs
Processing
2 hrs
Movement
4 hrs
Processing
Output waiting
to be shipped
4 hrs
4 hrs
Movement
Storage
Waiting Time etc
We can by a simple Cycle time Analysis select and target such potential areas / activities
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
134
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
TOTAL
% TOTAL
Time
Taken
120
15
120
180
120
10
15
90
15
120
120
957
100 %
What kind of
activities are
these.
VA / NVA / VE??
% STEPS
Why should we
retain activities
which are NVA
and contributing
to total TAT???
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
135
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
Total
% Total
120
15
120
180
120
10
15
90
15
120
120
957
100%
48
5%
180
18.80%
- Control/ Inspection
0.80%
- Delay
690
72.10%
- Move
30
3.10%
- Value-Enabling
0.10%
957
100%
Value-Added
% Steps
Nonvalue-Added
- Internal Failure
- External Failure
- Prep/Set-Up
Total
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
136
Cycle Time
The total time from the point in which a customer requests a good or service until the good or service is
delivered to the customer. Cycle time includes process time and delay time
Process Time
The total time that a unit of work is having something done to it other than time due to delays or waiting.
It includes the time taken for value-added steps, internal failure, external failure, control, inspection,
preparation/set-up, and move
Delay Time
Total time in which a unit of work is waiting to have something done to it
Linking value analysis with cycle time analysis creates a compelling business case for change
Displaying this information on process maps emphasizes focus areas for improvement and begins building
data for Quantify the Opportunity
Tips/Traps
Dont get stuck on deciding if a step is value-added or nonvalue-added
Allow team to discuss it
Consensus with 2/3s majority vote
Push team to make process map a true as is.
The ratio for an average as is map is 20% value-added, 80% nonvalue-added
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
137
Hypothesis Testing
When you suspect some of the Xs to cause differences (variation) on the Y, then that is
the hypothesis.
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
138
Hypothesis Testing
What kind of differences are we trying to detect with the help of Hypothesis Testing?
Continuous data:
Differences in averages
Differences in variation
Differences in distribution shape of values
Discrete data:
Differences in proportions
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
139
Normal
Data
There are different types of the Hypothesis Tests. The type of the test depends on
Statistical definition (Discrete or Continuous) of Xs & Y
n
o
i
s
s
e
r
Reg
ANOVA
a
S
1-
le
p
m
st
e
tT
t
s
e
T
t
ple
m
a
S
2
Chi-Square Test
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
140
Hypothesis Testing
ANOVA The simplest type of problem that is studied with the help of the analysis
of variance is one in which a single factor is under consideration and this factor
possesses several categories of levels, which could have a possible effect on a
variable of interest. Example, suppose an office manager is interested in knowing
which of the four brands of typewriters has to be purchased for the office. The
hypothesis tested is that all brands of the typewriters yield same result.
It can be used to predict the value of one variable when the value (s) of other related
variable(s) is (are) known; and
It can be used to examine whether there is relationship between two or more variables
and it can further describe the strength of that relationship.
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
141
Hypothesis Testing
Example: A state agro canning company uses an automatic machine to fill cans to a
specified weight. As the automatic machine has a tendency to drift out of adjustments,
the quality assurance department draws a random sample of 20 cans from each days
production and weighs these cans. The average weight of the sample can is found to be
485 g instead of the specified weight of 500 g and the sample standard deviation was
16.5 g. Would you specify, on the basis of the sample information, a readjustment for the
automatic machine?
Test concerned two populations and two samples. Is the average expenditure of the male
customer is equal to the average expenditure of the female customer. Sales of the
product before and after an advertising campaign.
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
142
No
Regression Topics
Yes
Are
Ys
Continuous
?
No, Y Is Discrete
2 (Chi Square)
Yes, Y Is Continuous
Parametric
Comparing
only 2
Groups ?
Non Parametric
Yes
Are
You
Comparing To
A Standard?
Yes
No
2 Sample t-Test
1 Sample t-Test
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
143
Minitab Directions
Stat>Basic Statistics>2 Sample t.
There are two ways to make a two-group comparison, depending on how you have
recorded data in Minitab
If each group is in its own column, select the Samples in different columns option
If all the data is in one column and you have factor labels in a second column, select the
Samples in one column option
While you can assume that the variation in the two groups is equal, its usually more
appropriate to leave the Assume equal variances box unchecked
If you have all the response data in one column and the group identity labels in another
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
144
T-test: An example
The t-test is used when we wish to compare the average performance of two groups.
A brand Bulbs
B brand Bulbs
The statistical test examines whether the data supports or disputes the
Null Hypothesis no difference between the means of the two populations .
m1 = m2
Alternate Hypothesis that the means are not equal or when there is a difference between the two population means
m1 m2
when you dont have a clear preference: less than or greater than
m1 < m2
or m1 > m2
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
145
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
146
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
147
Homogeneity of Variance
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
148
Homogeneity of Variance
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
149
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
150
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
151
ANNOVA
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
152
A process was producing 106 non defectives and 376 defectives per day. After improvement it was
performing at a level of 503 non defectives and 0 defectives. Do the two processes differ significantly?
Defectives
Non defectives
C2
503
310.99
C3
0
192.01
TOTAL
503
106
298.01
376
183.99
482
Total
609
376
985
Thus the two processes are proved to be significantly different from each other on performing a Chi
Square test on the values for the before and after the change scenarios
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
153
Chi Square
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
154
Chi Square
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
155
Chi Square
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
156
1-
Tes
n
g
i
S
e
l
Samp
Kruskal-Wallis
Non
Normal
Data
ey
n
t
i
h
W
Mannre
a
u
q
S
Chi
Mood's Median Test
t
s
e
T
s
n
u
R
Above are test to be used when the data is not normal
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
157
Hypothesis Testing
It is used to test whether the two different group data has changed by analyzing the
signs of the result.
Run Test
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
158
To narrow down upon the key variables (root causes) we next go on to a topic that
Helps us determine the NATURE & STRENGTH of a relationship between 2 variables
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
159
Correlation
A Correlation problem arises when the 6s team discusses whether there is any relationship
between a pair of variables
predictor variables (Xs) and the response variable (Ys) (i.e., causes and the effect).
The equation under consideration stands at Y = f(x)
This technique can be used to
See whether the potential cause variable and the effect variable are related to one another
The range is the difference between the largest and smallest values
The range of the potential cause variable should be wide enough to show possible
relationships with the effect variable
Check whether the data pattern indicates possible problems in the data
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
160
Scatter Diagram
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
1K
2K
3K
4K
5K
6K
7K
8K
9K
10K
Amount to be
Sanctioned (X)
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
161
Some Scenarios
1
Strong Positive
Correlation
Positive
Correlation
No Correlation
Negative
Correlation
Other Pattern
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
162
Some Scenarios
Interpretation Of Patterns:
Positive Relationship: X Increases/Y Increases
Graph 5 there is no relationship between X and Y. No one line best describes the data
163
Growing
Population of ants
Word of Caution
164
Regression
r = 1.0
No linear correlation
r= 0
r = +1.0
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
165
Regression
Y = mX + C
Line of
Best Fit
X
Regression Equation: Y = mX + C, where
C = Predicted Value Of Y When X = 0
m= Slope Of Line
Change in Y Per Unit Change in X
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
166
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
167
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
168
WHAT: Quantifying the Opportunity is all about the Six Sigma Team visiting the Benefits to be
accrued from the project. The index at this point of time would comprise of both Hard &
Soft gains (with a $ figure attached to hard gains) however no cost factors are involved at
this time
WHY: To provide the financial rationale of continuing the project, and to gauge the allowable
spending on the specific solution (s) that will be identified in Improve. It is a key milestone
to be covered before the Analyze tollgate
WHEN: Usually after the verification of the vital few root causes
Cost/Benefit Analysis
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
169
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
170
Improve
Fix the process (es)
Improve
GENERATE/SELECT SOLUTIONS
Brainstorming
TRIZ
DOE
Criteria Matrix
REFINE SOLUTION
NGT
FMEA
Error Proofing
TEST SOLUTION
Pilot planning
Verification of Results
JUSTIFY SOLUTION
Cost Benefit Analysis
Deliverables:
Solution Design
Cost
Benefit Analysis
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
172
Improve - Steps
Creative
Approach
Analytical
Approach
Brainstorming
Data
Analysis
(DOE)
Test the
new Idea
Pilot
Justify
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
173
Design of Experiments
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
174
Resources
Planning
Response
Control input costs
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
175
What is DOE?
A DOE is a planned set of tests on the response variable(s) (KPOVs) with one or
more inputs (factors) (PIVs) each at two or more settings (levels) which will:
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
176
DOE Terminology
Response (Y, KPOV): the process output linked to the customer CTQ
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
177
DOE Objectives
Learning the most from as few runs as possible; efficiency is the objective of DOE
Identifying which factors affect mean, variation, both or none
Screening a large number of factors down to the vital few
Modeling the process with a prediction equation:
Optimizing the factor levels for desired response
Validating the results through confirmation
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
178
Strategy of Experimentation
Planning Phase
Execution Phase
Collect data
Analyze data
Validate results
Evaluate conclusions
Revise SOPs
Train affected workforce
Document results
Consider next experiment
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
179
Power On
Inputs
Process Map
Bulb life
Projector
Instructor Training
Outputs
Projector has
bright light
Projector is quiet
Cause
Colors correct
Computer Interface
Environment
Method Machine
Bulb
Room
Brightness Instructions
Computer Settings
Low Bulb
Brightness
Instructor
Light Meter
Process
Inputs
1
2
3
4
Quiet
Customer
Bright Light
Importance to
Color Correct
Rating of
Power on 9 3
Bulb Life 8 1
Instructor1 1
Computer 2 1
10
2
3
1
9
11
12
13
14
15
Total
119
95
23
95
5
6
7
Power On
Measurement
Person
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
180
Process Map
Bulb life
Outputs
Projector
Instructor Training
Projector is quiet
Colors correct Cause
Machine
Room
Brightness Instructions
7 8
Quiet
Rating of
Importance to
Customer
Total
Power on 9 3
Bulb Life 8 1
Instructor1 1
Computer 2 1
2
3
1
9
119
95
23
95
Process
Inputs
Bulb
Computer Settings
Low Bulb
Brightness
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Color Correct
Computer Interface
EnvironmentMethod
Bright Light
Power On
Inputs
10
11
12
13
14
15
Instructor
Light Meter
Power On
MeasurementPerson
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
181
Fractional Designs
2k Full Factorial
Optimize
Model
Few
Less
K
N
O
W
L
E
D
G
E
More
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
Less
C
O
S
T
More
182
X1 Price
X2 PO
X3 Terms
X1 Temp
X2 Press
X3 Time
Business
Process
Y:
Accounts
Receivable
Hold
Manufacturing
Process
Y:
Scrap
Reduction
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
183
Low-1
High+1
Press = 2
Press = 10
Temp = 10
Temp = 125
Resin = 56
Resin = 3560
temp
+1
+1
re
-1
-1
si n
+1
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
184
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
185
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
186
Two of the forty principles are listed in next page with accompanying service examples.
Apply Selected Inventive Principles To Your Contradiction/
Problem To Develop Innovative Solutions
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
187
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
188
Brainstorming Techniques
Structured Brainstorming
Unstructured Brainstorming
Smooth
Random Flow of Ideas
All opinions may not be captured
Lesser number of ideas generated
Effective process for creative ideas
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
189
Brainstorming Techniques
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
190
Brainstorming Principles
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
191
Anti Solution
Channeling
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
192
Analogy
Brain Writing
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
193
Brainstorming Techniques
Channeling: This form of brainstorming entails channeling of thoughts of the participants similar
Antisolution: Here the objective of the team is reversed to exactly the opposite of what is to be
determined. E.g. In an effort to improve the training program, the team can debate about the ways
in which the training program can be worsened. The solutions are opposite of what is determined
during the discussion
Brain writing: Written ideas are exchanged in this process. Each person who receives a written
idea tries to expand on it or adds a totally new idea to it. The pieces of paper are rotated & a
collections of ideas or solutions are then debated & prioritized. This is used when the team
members are unknown to each other
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
194
Solution Selection
Screening against
Must Be
Benefits
Effort
N/3 Voting
Generate/Update
List of Solutions
Rationalize/Justify/
Reject solutions
Tally Votes
for each
choice
Allow members
to choose 1/3 of the
list as choices
Establish Criteria
Assign
Wt.
# of
Votes
Soln. 1
Soln. 2
Ease of Use
Inter site availability
Preparation of Charts
Information Real time
Auto escalation of
unresolved issues
Filters & Regulated
Access
Total Score:
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
195
Solution Selection
Pay-off Matrix: After the possible solutions are generated, they can be assigned to
different quadrants of the pay off matrix. The ideas which are low on benefits, are
rejected. The discussion is then focused on the high effort/high benefits and
these are rationalized for implementation. Some of the solutions in this quadrant
are so prohibitively expensive that they can be eliminated without further
analysis. Caution needs to be maintained when eliminating potential solutions
from this quadrant
Screening against Must be criteria: Company policies, Local laws & Social
considerations are extremely important before proceeding further on any
solution. Finally, the extent to which the customer CTQs of the project are
satisfied is a key consideration for selection (Use Kano model to evaluate
expected extent of satisfaction generated)
N/3 Voting: The key consideration in this form is that all rejected solutions should
be justified
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
196
The total scores obtained at the bottom of the solution are used to select the
same
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
197
Solutions
6
1
3
5
4
2
4
1
3
6
5
2
6
1
2
4
3
5
16
3
8
15
12
9
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
198
Error Proofing
Warns Operators before the Xs move to the outside limit so that the preventive
action can be taken
The opportunity for error needs to be minimized or eliminated
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
199
FMEA
Definition
Failure Mode & Effects Analysis is a tool to identify the relevant importance of possible
failure of the process/solution & establish clear mitigation strategy associated with the
risks
Principle of FMEA
Impact of any failure on a process is not only severity of the failure but also the
frequency of occurrence & the ability of the control mechanism to detect the failure
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
200
FMEA
Objective:
Addressing rational concerns that have significant affect on the performance of the
proposed solution
It would be best to address concerns from a process perspective rather than have a
business contingency plan activity which would affect the entire business (e.g
Earthquake, Fires, Natural calamities, Geo-political exigencies, Power back ups etc.).
Each individual SME/functional expert would position the argument. More often than not
the suggestions/action plans would come from him/her or through a judicious
discussion within the group.
The process owner takes the final call on the impact except when issue is related to a
Legal or a Compliance issue.
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
201
FMEA
Calculate the Risk Priority Number by multiplying the scores associated with
Severity, Occurrence & Detection-revisit frequently to update
Process
Step/Part
Number
Actions
Recom
mended
Potential
Failure
Mode
Resp.
Potential
Failure
Effects
Target
Date
Actions
Taken
S
E
V
Potential
Causes
S
E
V
O
C
C
O
C
C
D
E
T
Current
Controls
D
E
T
R
P
N
R
P
N
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
202
Calculating RPN
RPN = Severity x Occurrence x Detection
Severity Scale
Rating
Bad
10
Be illegal
More the
severity,
higher is
the
rating
Good
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
203
Calculating RPN
RPN = Severity x Occurrence x Detection
Occurrence Scale
More
Bad
Rating
10
Good
Time Period
Probability
often it
> 30%
occurs,
30%
higher is
5%
the rating
1%
.03%
1 Per 10,000
6 Per 100,000
6 Per Million
3 Per 10 Million
2 Per Billion
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
204
Calculating RPN
RPN = Severity x Occurrence x Detection
Detection Scale
Lower the
Bad
Rating
10
Definition
ability
to detect,
is the
rating
higher
modifications
5
Good
2
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
205
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
206
Testing Essentials
Create a Data collection plan & monitor activities for Data consistency & Stability
Verify that the process has improved-Process capability, Hypothesis Testing for
evaluating Statistical significance of the old & the improved process
Why collect
Data?
What to
Collect ?
How to
Collect?
Ensure
Consistency&
Stability
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
207
Justify Solution
Tangible Benefits
Savings
Incremental Revenue
Interest Cost & Income
Cash Flow
Reduced Workforce
Intangible Benefits
Customer Retention
Improved VOE/VOC/VOS
Ease of Work
Better Governance
Prepare Net Financial Gains & supplement with Intangible gains and Obtain
Business & Finance Leader approvals before proceeding
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
208
CBA
Hard Gains
Cost Heads
Trainer Cost
T& L
Q Team Support
Facilities
Equipment
Stationary & Manuals
GB Examination
Total Cost
Vendor
250,000
30,000
4,444
20,000
1,000
15,000
50,000
370,444
In House Training
0
0
11,111
20,000
1,000
10,000
2,222
44,333
Soft Gains
Trainings customized to
the need of the employees
Benefits of Training
In-house
vs.
Employing a Vendor
Assumptions
1. Hypothetical Costs assumed
2. Recurring cost of upgrading the content is INR 66, 667
* All Figures in INR
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
209
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
210
Control
Sustaining the benefits
Control
1
IMPLEMENT SOLUTION
Stakeholder Analysis
Implementation elements
3
CLOSE PROJECT
Documentation
Communication of Learning
Project Closure
Deliverables:
Communication
of Project
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
212
Why Control?
Improvements
Process Control
No Process Control
Time
To hold the gains of the DMAIC project there by ensuring that the efforts of
the project team are not written off
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
213
Why Control?
Detect the out of control state of processes & determine the appropriate
actions
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
214
What To Control?
Input
Measures
(Xs)
Output
Measures
Process Measures
Monitoring
Points
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
215
Deployment flow
chart
Documentation
&
Standardization
Activity Details
Key Measures
Monitoring
Response
plan
Ongoing Auditing
Standards
Measurement &
Process
Procedure for
adjustment
Containment
Procedure for
improvement
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
216
Detail On
Key Tasks
Monitoring
Response Plan
Checking
CheckingThe
TheWork
Work
Key Process
And Output
Measures
Monitoring
Standards
The
TheResponse
ResponseTo
ToSpecial
SpecialCauses
Causes
Method For
Recording
Data
Containment
Procedure
For Process
Adjustment
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
Procedure
For System
Improvement
217
Documentation
Implemented successfully
Retained by the business
Used to standardize the business processes
Future resources can be trained easily
Improvements can be shared and translated across
Institutionalized
Documentation Levels
Process
Management
System
Core Process
Flowcharts
Procedures
Checklist
Micro Process
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
218
SPC
Control Charts
Monitor Changes in the Xs & detect changes that are due to Special Causes
Used when the Xs cannot be mistake proofed or need to be controlled for inherent
variations
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
219
Control Charts
Common
Cause/Random Variation
6000
3.0SL=5587
5000
X=4198
4000
3000
-3.0SL=2810
1
2000
Subgroup
Week
10
20
30
40
10/22/00
12/31/00
3/11/01
5/20/01
Special Cause
Variation
Average
Time/Sequence Axis
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
220
Interpretation of Variation
How you interpret variation . . .
True Variation Type
Common Causes
Common
Causes
Special
Causes
Focus on systematic
process change
Mistake 2
Under-reacting
(missed prevention)
Special Causes
Mistake 1
Tampering
(increases variation)
Investigate
special causes
for possible
quick-fixes
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
221
Continuous
Discrete
Type Of Data
?
Need To
Detect
Small
Shifts
?
No
Rational
Individuals
Individual Subgroups
Measurements
Or
Subgroups
?
Sample
Size
<10
Yes
Individuals
and Moving Range
Chart
Type Of
Discrete
Data
?
Classification
(defectives)
X and R
Chart
Constant
Sample
Size
?
Yes
Yes
Count
(defects)
Constant
Opportunity
?
No
No
X and S
Chart
p-Chart
np Chart
c-Chart
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
u-Chart
222
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
223
2. The technical support area is monitoring average response time on help requests. Each hour 5
calls are sampled.
3. A team is monitoring the number of applications received each day with incomplete fields. All
applications are being audited. Each day 200-250 applications are received.
4. A team is monitoring the cycle time for the underwriters loan decisions. The data comes in
slowly; that is, one loan is completed daily.
5. A team is tracking the number of fields left blank on an application. Each day a sample of 100
applications is audited.
6. Another team is doing the same thing as the team in example 5 (counting the number of fields left
blank on an application), only they are looking at all the applications that come in daily. Each day
50-100 applications are turned in.
7. The team is tracking the number of abandoned calls to a customer call center in a shift. Each shift
takes from 200-400 calls.
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
224
np-Chart
30
3.0SL=0.3324
0.2
P=0.1685
0.1
Number Defectives
Proportion Defective
0.3
1
NP=12.00
10
-3.0SL=3.101
-3.0SL=0.004728
0.0
0
0
10
20
10
u-Chart
c-Chart
Defects reported on 100 sq. m of Artificial Leather
3.0SL=7.677
7
6
5
4
3
C=2.725
2
1
0
-3.0SL=0.00E+00
10
20
30
Sample Number
40
0.08
Number of Defect/sq. m
20
Sample Number
Sample Number
3.0SL=20.90
20
3.0SL=0.07520
0.07
0.06
0.05
0.04
0.03
U=0.02705
0.02
0.01
0.00
-3.0SL=0.00E+00
0
10
20
30
40
Sample Number
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
225
1050
11
1
1
3.0SL=1011
1050
3.0SL=1011
950
X=936.9
850
Subgroup
950
11
-3.0SL=862.8
10
20
30
40
50
X=936.9
1
1
0
10
1
20
30
40
50
Moving Range
850
-3.0SL=862.8
100
3.0SL=90.96
50
R=27.84
0
-3.0SL=0.00E+00
602
601
X=600.2
600
599
-3.0SL=598.1
598
Subgroup
Range within
individual
Subgroups of
Samples
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
10
Subgroupl Mean
603
3.0SL= 7.866
X=600.2
600
599
-3.0SL=598.6
598
0
10
3
2
R=3.720
3.0SL=601.9
601
Subgroup
20
602
Subgroup
Standard
Deviation
Mean of Subgroups of
Samples Collected
20
3.0SL=2.909
S=1.695
-3.0SL=0.00E+00
-3.0SL=0.4808
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
226
Examples
Ex1: You work at an automobile engine assembly plant. One of the parts, a
camshaft, must be 600 mm +2 mm long to meet engineering specifications. There
has been a chronic problem with camshaft length being out of specification,
which causes poor-fitting assemblies, resulting in high scrap and rework rates.
Your supervisor wants to run control chart to monitor this characteristic, so for a
month, you collect a total of 100 observations (20 samples of 5 camshafts each)
from all the camshafts used at the plant, and 100 observations from each of your
suppliers
Ex2: You are conducting a study on the blood glucose levels of 9 patients who are
on strict diets and exercise routines. To monitor the mean and standard deviation
of the blood glucose levels of your patients, create a control chart. You take a
blood glucose reading every day for each patient for 20 days
Ex3: As the distribution manager at a limestone quarry, you want to monitor the
weight
(in pounds) and variation in the 45 batches of limestone that are shipped weekly
to an important client. Each batch should weigh approximately 930 pounds
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
227
Examples
Ex4: Suppose you work in a plant that manufactures picture tubes for televisions.
For each lot, you pull some of the tubes and do a visual inspection. If a tube has
scratches on the inside, you reject it. If a lot has too many rejects, you do a 100%
inspection on that lot
Ex5: You work in a toy manufacturing company and your job is to inspect the
number of defective bicycle tires. You inspect 200 samples in each lot and then
decide to create a control chart to monitor the number of defectives. To make the
chart easier to present at the next staff meeting, you decide to split the chart by
every 10 inspection lots
Ex6: Suppose you work for a linen manufacturer. Each 100 square yards of fabric
can contain a certain number of blemishes before it is rejected. For quality
purposes, you want to track the number of blemishes per 100 square yards over a
period of several days, to see if your process is behaving predictably
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
228
Examples
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
229
Implementation
Objectives
Incorporation of Pilot learning
Resources & Time Frame
Influence Strategy
Control plan
Documentation
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
230
Implementation Strategy
3 2 -P o rt P a tch P a n e l
3 2 -P o rt
P a tc h P a n e l
W or k g ro u p
Hub
S W - W in g , 4 t h - F lr .
C a r d io lo g y N u r s e S t a t io n
3 2 -P o rt P a tch P a n e l
W or k g ro u p
Hub
S E - W i n g , 8 t h - F lr .
O B / G Y N N u r s e S t a t io n
3 2 -P o rt P a tch P a n e l
C is c o 7 5 0 7
M u lti p r o to c o l
R o u te r
C a b l e tr o n M M A C
P lu s C h a s s is
W or k g ro u p
Hub
S E - W in g , 3 r d - F lr .
T I - C A T /M R I N u r s e S t a t i o n
F i b e r P a tc h C o r d s
3 2 -P o rt P a tch P a n e l
6 4 -P o rt
P a tc h P a n e l
W or k g ro u p
Hub
N W - W in g , B s m t . C o m p u te r R o o m
T IT L E
S E - W in g , G n d . - F l r .
E R N u r s e S ta tio n
D E S C R I P T IO N
S a m p le L o g i c a l D i a g r a m
Quality of
solution
A V is i o s a m p l e d r a w in g f il e s h o w i n g t h e a p p l ic a t io n o f s h a p e s f r o m v a r io u s
N e t w o r k E q u i p m e n t s t e n c il s i n c o n s t r u c t i n g a l o g i c a l n e t w o r k d i a g r a m .
S C A LE
R E V IS E D
NT S
DA T E
D RA W N
B Y
1 2 /1 5 / 9 6
JL
Acceptance of
Solution
Effectiveness of Implemented
Solution
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
231
Acceptance Strategy
Key constituents Map
Stakeholders Analysis
Stakeholder Analysis
Names
Strongly
Against
Moderately
Against
Neutral
Moderately
Supportive
Associates
SLT
X
X
Quality
SWAT
Team
Stakeholder 1
Stakeholder 2
Stakeholder 3
Influence Strategy
Issue/Concern Identify Wins
Customers
Mid
Management
Strongly
Supportive
TPC Analysis
Strategy
Data
Demonstrate
Demand
Cause of
resistance
Examples
Ranking
Technical
Political
Cultural
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
232
Acceptance Strategy
Key Constituents Map: This tool is used for mapping out the size of the
stakeholder team that would be affected by the change that is going to be
implemented. The tool helps the team identify what should be the right
composition of the implementation team (proportional to the key constituents
map sections). It also helps determine (based on size) the stakeholder that needs
to be addressed first
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
233
Implement Solution
3 2 -P o r t P a tc h P a n e l
3 2 -P o rt
P a tc h P a n e l
W o rk g ro u p
H ub
S W - W in g , 4 t h - F lr .
C a r d io lo g y N u r s e S ta tio n
3 2 -P o r t P a tc h P a n e l
W o rk g ro u p
H ub
S E - W in g , 8 t h - F l r .
O B /G Y N N u r s e S t a t io n
3 2 -P o r t P a tc h P a n e l
C is c o 7 5 0 7
M u l t ip r o t o c o l
R o u te r
C a b le t r o n M M A C
P lu s C h a s s is
W o rk g ro u p
H ub
S E - W in g , 3 r d - F lr .
T I -C A T /M R I N u r s e S t a t io n
F ib e r P a tc h C o r d s
3 2 -P o r t P a tc h P a n e l
6 4 -P o rt
P a tc h P a n e l
W o rk g ro u p
H ub
N W - W in g , B s m t. C o m p u t e r R o o m
T IT LE
S E - W in g , G n d . - F lr.
E R N u r s e S ta t io n
D E S C R IP T IO N
S a m p le L o g i c a l D ia g r a m
A V is i o s a m p l e d r a w i n g f i l e s h o w i n g t h e a p p l i c a t i o n o f s h a p e s f r o m v a r i o u s
N e t w o r k E q u i p m e n t s t e n c il s i n c o n s t r u c t i n g a l o g i c a l n e t w o r k d i a g r a m .
S CA LE
NTS
DATE
1 2 /1 5 / 9 6
D RA W N
BY
R E V IS E D
JL
Stakeholder 2
Stakeholder 3
Data
Demonstrate
Demand
+
Project management
tools
Successful
Implementation
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
234
Project Closure
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
235
Summary
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
236
Presenter Details:
2010 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated
with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
237