Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Emissions Inventory
Lpez Rosario
Lamming Steve
Ludea Sandro
AGENDA
Major
Components
Gate
TSF El Llagal
ARD 03 Pond
Process Plant
ARD 01 Pond
Moore Pit
Stockpiles
Autoclaves
CCD Wash Circuit
Introduccin
The mining sector in many countries constitutes a significant
impact to local air quality and mining interests around the
world have to quantify offsite air quality risks.
While this risk has traditionally been determined by dispersion
modelling, it is the determination of source emissions that is
the primary input.
A sensitivity analysis is a tool to evaluate the overall
uncertainty in the emission estimates and to assess where
limited site resources are best assigned to gather more
detailed information may be required to refine emissions data.
For this study, sources are categorized into two source groups
point and fugitive, focusing on two air contaminants
particulate and nitrogen oxides as indicators
Knowledge of key sources of variability in emissions can also
be used to prioritize strategies for controlling emissions.
General Process
Extraccin
Voladura
Transporte
Molienda
Chancado
Proceso
hmedo
del
mineral
Refinacin
Extraccin
del metal
Refinamient
o del metal
Aproach to emission
estimation
Emission factors
The basic formulation of an emission rate is shown as
Emission rate (kg/hr) = Activity rate (units/hr) x Emission factor
(kg/unit) x (1 - Control efficiency (%)/100)
Source measurement
The calculation of emission factors using measured
data, obtained through source testing or
continuous emission monitoring, is a function of the
exhaust flow rate and the concentration of the
specific contaminant in the flow.
In most test campaigns, uncertainty in
measurement methods or results is typically an
average of three source tests where the coefficient
of variation (COV) may vary widely.
Percentage Contribution by
Source
Category and
Activity
% PM in
category
EF
Ratin
g
Blasting
EF
Handling &
Transport
Crushing
EF
Storage piles
Extraction
Process Plant
Source emissions
(autoclaves)
Tanks / Cooling
towers
Other process
Refinery
Plant Total
1
2
Estimatio
n Method
% of total
plant NOx
emission
99.3%
28.7%
83.9%
B1
66.9%
14.0%
EF
3.6%
0%
EF
C1
0.8%
0%
SM
A2
2.4%
100%
EF
95.4%
0%
EF
2.2%
0%
SM
A2
100%
100%
0.4%
100%
% of total
plant PM
emission
63.3%
36.2%
0.5%
100%
% NOx in
category
Percentage Contribution by
Source
CoV Range PM
Max
Min
Max
Min
Extraction
Process
Plant
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
29.05%
5.04%
56.26%
8.93%
Refinery
16.63%
2.65%
164.62%
23.81%
Conclusiones
In the development of an emissions inventory, proponents
must consider the application of the most appropriate
estimation methodology for each emissions source based
on information available to the project team.
Where the overall contaminant impact may be significant
and the number of sources small then increased attention
should be paid to logging parameters for those sources that
will most significantly affect the emission rate calculation.
In conclusion it is strongly recommended that estimates
used to generate emissions profiles for permit processes are
validated on the as-built scenario for mine due diligence
and environmental protection.