Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Rune Instefjord
Project leader, Gullfaks IOR
Gullfaks
Gullfaks
Expected recovery:
61 %Mill. Sm3
Produced
to date: 327
Expected recovery: 61 %
TVD MHN
R a te 1 0 0 0 S m 3 /m o n th
3 000
2 500
2 000
Viscosity: ~ 0.5 1 cp
1 500
1 000
500
0
1986
1988
1990
Basis Water
1992
1994
1996
1998
IOR Water
2000
2002
2004
Basis OIL
2006
2008
2010
IOR Oil
2012
2014
2016
2018
2020
Start prognosis
Gullfaks Field
B
C
Post-Jurassic
sediments
Domino System
Accommodation
msl
1000 m
Horst
2000 m
Brent Gr.
Statfj.
Fm.
Tordis
breakaway
fault
3000 m
4000 m
Intra-Teist refl.
5000 m
Low-angle
detachment
6000 m
Basement
7000 m
8000 m
Structural interpretation
Line 736
CDP 400
600
Cretaceous/Tertiary
sediments
800
Base Cretaceous
unconformity
1000
1200
Brent
Group
1400
Statfjord
Fm.
Reservoir Quality
Porosity: 25-35 %
Permeability:
Tarbert, Etive, good Ness, good
Statfjord and Cook- 3 >1D
Moderate-to-High Reservoir
Quality
Contrasting layers
Weak formations
Drainage strategy
Secondary:
Secondary:
Secondary:
Secondary:
Secondary:
Gas
Gas
injection,
up-dip
Gas
injection,
up-dip
Gasinjection,
injection,up-dip
up-dip
Gas
injection,
up-dip
WAG
injection
WAG
WAGinjection
injection
WAG
injection
WAG
injection
(continues)
Why?
Why?
Why?
Why?
Avoid
Avoid
production
reduction
reduction
when
when
gas
gas
export
is
is
at
its
Avoidproduction
production
reduction
when
gasexport
export
isat
atits
itsis at its
Avoid
production
reduction
when
gas export
maximum
maximum
maximum
maximum
Reduce
storage
costs
costs
and
and
CO
CO
tax
tax
Reduce
Reducestorage
storage
costs
andand
CO222CO
tax tax
Reduce
storage
costs
2
Produce
Produce
attic
attic
oil
oil
Produce attic oil
Produce
attic oil
oil
Reduce
Reduce residual
residual
oil saturation
saturation
Reduce residual oil saturation
Reach
areas
difficult
to reach
with
injection,
Reach
Reach areas
areas difficult
difficult to
to reach
reach
with
with water
waterwater
injection,
injection,
ex.
ex. Ness
Nessex.
by
by LB
LB
Ness
Reach
areas
difficult
to
reach
with
water
injection,
ex.
Ness by LB
injection
injection
by LB injection
injection
Commingle pressure
production under bubble point
Reservoir
Accelerate
Create
gasproduction
lift, save drilling costs
Commingle production
Accelerate production
Horizontal
Horizontal wells
wells
Horizontal wells
Horizontal wells
Get
Get uniform
uniform drainage,
drainage, decrease
decrease sand
sand production
production
Drain
Drainuniform
Get
by-passed
by-passed
drainage,
oil
oil decrease sand production
Get
uniform
drainage,
decrease sand production
Drain by-passed oil
Drain
Createby-passed
gas lift, saveoil
drilling costs
Create gas lift, save drilling costs
RESERVES
PRODUCED
Mill.mill
Sm3
year
Sm 3per
pr. r
35
In additon, tie-in of
satellite fields has
increased the oil and
gas sales from the
field (1994 Tordis,
1998 GF Satellites
Phase 1, 2001 GF
Satellites Phase 2.
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
88 Rev PUD
93 Hst
94 Hst
RSP 00
RSP 02
RSP 03
RSP 04
2016
2014
2012
2010
2008
2006
2004
2002
2000
1998
1996
1994
1992
1990
1988
1986
Produsert
RSP 96
IOR at Gullfaks
Main reasons for improved recovery
Continuous focus on reservoir description and monitoring
An increased no. of drainage points / wells and the use of superinjectors for
water injection
Duration: 2006-2008.
Main goal: mature the undefined IOR ambition volumes (and more?) to RC 5.
Identify specific measures and demonstrate that they may be economical feasible.
Implemented (continued):
Multilateral wells
Underbalanced drilling
drilled)
Expandable liners
4D seismic
Monobore completions
Water circulation
Main mechanism for IOR at Gullfaks.
1,0
0,9
0,7
Rel. Perm.
water injection.
Krw - Referanse
Krw - Sor = 0.2
Kro - Referanse
Kro - Sor =0.2
0,8
0,6
0,5
0,4
0,3
0,2
phases.
0,1
0,0
0
0,2
0,4
0,6
0,8
Water Saturation
lab experiments.
0,10
0,09
0,07
R el. P erm.
producers.
0,08
0,06
0,05
0,04
0,03
0,02
0,01
0,00
0,6
0,65
0,7
0,75
0,8
0,85
Water Saturation
0,9
0,95
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0
10
12
Surface seismic
1985, 1996, 1999,
2003
Shadow area
OBS acquired
in 2001
OBS acquired
In 2003
Status 4D
Based on 4D seismic we have drilled more than 10 wells with success.
Top Brent (Tarbert), top Etive, top Cook and top Statfjord are the formations
where 4D has been most valuable.
All wells have hit their target and most of them produced more than expected in
the Recommendation To Drill.
Flooding map
Reservoir monitoring and management
Simulation
models
Structural
framework
Sedimentology, detailed
stratigraphy
Reservoir
description and
initial volume
Time-lapse
seismic
1985
Top reservoir
OWC
OWC
1999
Top reservoir
Production, injection
rates, RST and PLT
B-8
B-12
B-12
D4A
B-29BT3
B-5AT2
1857
1867
1946
B-29BT3(F4)
B-29BT2
1832
1876
B-27
Flooding map
1822
1820
2035
B-29A
2002
B-17
D3
G5
B-36
B-23(1)
B-23 (3)
B-23
1809
Water flooded
B-21
B-21BB-21A
1902
1966
B-6B-6
1816
1818
B-19
1799
1798
1794
B-31(2)
1811
B-34
B-34
B-13
PBTE41
B-29
B-19A
B-23 (1)
B-9
B-9
B-19T2
1795
B-2
1806
1830
PBTD31
B-30
B-30
1846
1878
1879
B-22A
1882
1789
1867
1817
E4
B-33
1795
B-36AT2
B-36AT2
B-22
1860
B-32
B-32
1850
B-1
B-1
1905
B-29BT3
(2)
H5
B-3
B-3
B-17
B-13AT2
B-13AT2
B-29BT3(F2)
B-29BT2(F1)
B-29BT3(F1)
B-29B(F1)
B-24
B-24(1)
1851
F5
1803
1810
B-16
B-16
B-29BT3
C-30(2)
C-30
B-5
B-15
B-15
B-15T2
1958
B-29BT3(F3)
1809
PBTH53
H3
1790
H4
1798
B-10A
B-7
1801
B-10
1772
1765
1774
H2
A-23
A-23
G4
B-4A
B-4A
1810
A-31
A-31
A-21(F)
A-25A
1789
A-25A
A-16A
A-16A
1777
1791
A-14
A-32B
A-32B
1826
A-32A
A-18
1758
A-1H
1771
B-37 (F)
A-45(F)
1820
1866
F4
1898
A-42(F)
A-28
A-30
A-28
A
A
A-38
1778
G2
1771
A-10
A-19
1868
PATF31
A-29
1899
F3
A-24A
A-24A
1973
1864
F2
A-46T2
A-41
1792
1808
Future producer
1783
1851
G1
WAG injector
Oljefylt
A-13
8
1797
A-21A
A-21A
1813
1787
1782
A-15
A-15
A-24
1764
1765
1778
A-35
A-22
1893
1856
A-17
1788
A-22
A-44
A-42(2)
A-39A
A-39
1772
A-7A
A-7A(F)
A-29
1753
1762
A-17AT2
1856
A-27
1757
1761
A-19
A-30
1771
1745
A-2AH
1765
1773
A-11
1860
1
A-5H
A-26
A-11
1761
A-36
H1
A-26
A-45
A-20A
A-20 A-20A
A-27A
A-27A
A-39A(3)
1756
1760
1780
A-32(F)
1821
E2
1749
1752
A-39A(2)
A-42(1)
Oil filled
A-34/A
A-8R2
A-8
A-42
Gas flooded or
originally in place
A-6A
A-6A
G3
1864
1894
Uncertain flooding
A-9H
A-3H
1779
E3
I1
A-4H
A-33
A-33
1778
A-16
1921
1756
A-12
1790
1985
B-25
1767
1785
1871
A-25
B-4
Vannflmmet
Water injector
Gasskappe
Delvis vannflmm
Delvis gassflmme
Gas injector
Delvis vann- og ga
Delvis gassflmmi
Usikker vannflmm
PATD11
E1
PATE11
Usikker gassflmm
Usikker vann- og g
Usikker gassflmm
AMIOR
Alternative project to reduce residual oil at Gullfaks.
Add nitrate (doing already due to reduction of H2S), phosphate and oxygen to the
injection water.
Reducing surface tension between oil and water and thereby mobilize oil.
BACTERIA + OIL + N + P + O2
AMIOR
Pilot in well A-41B recommend.
Closed area with steady-state conditions.
Good reservoir understanding.
Good spacing between injector and
producer.
Prospects
A wide range of prospects in the licence.
Drill from the platforms where possible.
Use existing infrastructure to produce
from the discoveries.
Conclusions
Recovery of 400 mill. Sm (app. 70% recovery factor).
Lengthening the field life time.
Water circulation is the main IOR method.
Drilling of new and less expensive wells important.
Alternative recovery methods may be a substantial part of the future.
Exploration and third part processing contributes.
Close collaboration between the different technical disciplines is an important
premise to reach the ambition.
Profitable measure
Assumptions regarding this evaluation are given in Appendix B
Likelihood of implementation equal to or greater than 30 %.
A way of calculating the likelihood of implementation is given in Appendix C.
Prepare plan (studies, eventual technology qualification, manning, budget,) and timing for next phase (when is
the right time to proceed).
The level of detail of such a plan depends on the size of the project/measure.
Documentation shall include;
Production effects (all HC phases) in the targeted reservoir(s)
Simple uncertainty estimation for production effects (low-medium-high)
Is the measure competing with other measures (yes/no which ones)
Evaluate whether the measure has any consequence for process capacities[1] (yes/no which ones)
Cost(Capex and OPEX) estimate for the measure (class A)
Economical evaluation
Plan and timing of next phase