Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Patraniche Chiril
Study methods
How participants were selected?
Study methods
How participants were selected?
- 175 primary schools;
Study methods
How participants were selected?
- 175 primary schools;
- Total sample of 4587 students;
Study methods
How participants were selected?
- 175 primary schools;
- Total sample of 4587 students;
- 2479 students+parents;
Study methods
How participants were selected?
- 175 primary schools;
- Total sample of 4587 students;
- 2479 students+parents;
- EATQ-R select only 415 subjects;
Study methods
How participants were selected?
- 175 primary schools;
- Total sample of 4587 students;
- 2479 students+parents;
- EATQ-R select only 415 subjects;
- 245 students agreed with EAA;
Study methods
How participants were selected?
- 175 primary schools;
- Total sample of 4587 students;
- 2479 students+parents;
- EATQ-R select only 415 subjects;
- 245 students agreed with EAA;
- 175 participate in MAA;
Study methods
How participants were selected?
- 175 primary schools;
- Total sample of 4587 students;
- 2479 students+parents;
- EATQ-R select only 415 subjects;
- 245 students agreed with EAA;
- 175 participate in MAA;
- 156 in LAA;
Study methods
What they measured?:
- Socio-economic status;
-Temperament (Early- and Mid-Adolescent
assessments) with EATQ-R.
-Risk-taking behavior (mid-adolescent
assessment): YRBS;
-Symptoms and behavioral problems (Earlyand Mid-Adolescent assessment)
-Parental gambling: SOGS;
Main findings
Main findings
Main findings
The PG behaviour is predicted by
Main findings
The PG behaviour is predicted by:
- alcohol use;
Main findings
The PG behaviour is predicted by:
- alcohol use;
- frustration;
Main findings
The PG behaviour is predicted by:
- alcohol use;
- frustration;
- aggression(females);
Main findings
The PG behaviour is predicted by:
- alcohol use;
- frustration;
- aggression(females);
- attention deficit(males);
Main findings
The PG behaviour is predicted by:
- alcohol use;
- frustration;
- aggression(females);
- attention deficit(males);
- increased socializing with their
peers(males).
Implications
New questions!
Can this study represent other
countries?
How does aggression correlate with
PG behaviour in females sample?
How can we stop PG behaviour?
Summary
For both sexes frustration and
alcohol use. Particularly for girls,
aggression is an predictor and for
boys the deficit of attention and
increased socializing with their peers.
Risk-taking
behaviour
Whole sample
No-risk
At-risk
Mean (SD)
Mean (SD)
p-value
T2
Safety*
0.91
(0.88)
1.38 (1.09)
0.091
Violence
0.46
(0.86)
0.69 (0.87)
0.194
Suicide
0.25
(0.69)
0.19 (0.40)
0.809
Tobacco
0.94
(1.52)
1.63 (1.86)
0.044
Alcohol
2.25
(2.07)
3.88 (2.19)
0.003
Cannabis
0.25
(0.59)
0.50 (0.73)
0.070
Other drugs
0.13
(0.42)
0.25 (0.45)
0.110
Sex
0.61
(1.19)
1.31 (1.92)
0.104
Total
5.79
(5.61)
9.81 (5.55)
T1
3.36
(0.86)
3.21 (0.93)
0.588
T2
2.84
(0.88)
2.64 (0.73)
0.341
T1
3.46
(0.73)
3.38 (0.77)
0.817
T2
3.34
(0.77)
2.91 (0.55)
0.003
Temperament
Activation control1
Attention1
0.018