Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Groton Utilities
Meeting Presentation
January 30, 2017
Project Pricing: Sitework
Electrical
WTP Rebuild
Mechanical
$43,901,043
Building Improvements
Engineering
$4,198,508
Finished Water Storage
Contingency
$5,900,449 DAF Dissolved Air Flotation
Hazmat Removal
Contingency
Engineering
Project Facility History
1890s Pumping Station
1938 Unit 1 Construction
1947 to1952 Unit 2
Construction
1960 Unit 3 Construction
1974 Sedimentation Basin
Addition to Unit 3
1978 Booster Station Added
1986 to 1989 Spent
Backwash Water & Sludge
Lagoons
1989 Chemical Feed
Upgrades
1991 Low Lift Pump Upgrade
1993 Emergency Generators
Replaced
2007 SCADA system
Project History - Study &
Preliminary Design
2007 Sedimentation Basin Study &
Recommendations
2008 Pilot Study - Dissolved Air Floatation ,
Granular Activated Carbon and Manganese
Contactors
2009 Water Treatment Plant Evaluation &
Conceptual Design Report
Opinion of Construction Cost $30M to $46M
2013 Preliminary Design of Improvements
DAF/GAC/Mn Contactors
Opinion of Construction Cost $29M to $41M
Project Review with Drs. Knocke & Edzwald
Project History - Design
Finished Water
Storage
Limited useable
depth in the existing
Increase for Fire
Protection
Backwashing Filters
Capacity for
Regional Demands
Allow for WFP
shutdowns for
maintenance
Importance of Treatment &
Chemical Systems
CLARIFICATION
Better at removing
small light particles,
color compounds, and
algae than current
sedimentation
treatment
Chemical application -
same dose of coagulant
is more effective at
removing turbidity
SAFETY Operators
dont have to enter
basins to remove solids
Importance of Treatment & Chemical
Systems
Filtration
Granular Activated Carbon
More effective at removing a
wide assortment of
contaminants, especially
organics, than rapid sand filters
Deep bed GAC is more effective
than GAC-capped rapid sand
filters (1930s technology with a
lid of GAC)
New filters will have filter-to-
waste technology as required
by regulations
Importance of Treatment & Chemical
Systems
Manganese Removal
Contactors
Retrofit
Removes Mn without
chemical treatment
(currently CIO2; by-products
= Chlorite, Chlorate
Currently a Health Advisory
for Mn (0.3 mg/L), not an
MCL
On test list for UCMR4 (2018-
2020 sampling period) for
possible regulation
Regulated in Ontario, Canada
Operators View of Importance
Process Control
Upgrade Chemical
Feed Systems
SCADA Upgrades
Increase Flexibility
& Reliability
Improve
regulatory
compliance
Importance of Treatment & Chemical
Trihalomethanes (THMs)
Systems
Removal
Regulations are Stricter
Current Plant does not address
removal of Precursors
Form within Distribution System
Trihalomethanes are compounds
formed when chlorine comes in
contact with natural organic
matter in water; they are an
issue for any WTP that uses
surface water reservoirs as their
source water
Previous upgrades to current
WTP were not able to address
THM reductions, new plant
processes and distribution
system upgrade will achieve
reductions in THMs (better
turnover in Bailey Hill tank =
less water age = less THMs
Project Pricing: Sitework
Electrical
WTP Rebuild
Mechanical
$43,901,043
Building Improvements
Engineering
$4,198,508
Finished Water Storage
Contingency
$5,900,449 DAF Dissolved Air Flotation
Hazmat Removal
Contingency
Engineering
Click icon to add picture
Comparison of Annual Water Bill @ 800 cu ft
$800
$700
$632 $652
$600
$500
$400
$300
$200
$100
$-
$561 $697 $744 $617 $670
Questions ???