Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2008.04.02
Ph.D. Candidate
Geotechnical & Geoenvironmental Engineering Lab
Seoul National University
2/24
Contents
Introduction
Approximate Nonlinear Analysis
Modeling
Pile-Soil Interaction
Pile-Soil-Pile Interaction
Raft-Soil-Pile interaction
Evaluations
Comparison with 3D FEM analysis
Conclusions
Further Study
3/24
Modeling Summary
Qp: Pile Load
Qpsi
Q : Point Load
q : Distributed Load
Raft wnet
Shaft Resistance
Iteration
for Qpb
Qs Soil Spring
Qp: Pile Load Compatibility
wnet
w Base Resistance
Pile-Soil Interaction
Kondner(1963)
qpba qpsa(i)
qpbu qpsu(i)
kpb kps(i)
wp wp
wp wp
q pb q ps ( i )
1 wp 1 wp
K pb q pba K ps ( i ) q psa (i )
wp : settlement
qpb : unit end bearing
qps(i) : unit skin friction at element i
kpb : initial stiffness of toe(Randolph & Worth, 1978)
kps(i) : initial stiffness of skin at element i
qpba = qpbu /Rf : an asymptote of qpb
qpsa(i) = qpsu(i)/Rf : an asymptote of qps(i)
qpbu : ultimate unit end bearing
qpsu(i) : ultimate unit skin friction at element i
Rf : reduction factor
End bearing Skin friction
8/24
Pile-Soil-Pile Interaction
Apparent stiffness reduction due to ground settlement generated by
pile settlement(Randolph & Worth, 1979)
No interface slip Interface slip
r
ws(r)
wp ws ws(rp)
w p ws rp
wp=ws(rp)+wslip
wslip
w p ws (rp )
s rp rm ws (rp ) w p wslip R fe wp
ws r ln , rp r rm
Gs r
wp wslip ws (rp )
ws r 0 , r rm R fe
wp wp
9/24
Pile-Soil-Pile Interaction
Superposition of settlement with the effects of the adjacent piles
settlement makes apparent stiffness reduction in the group pile.
wp i, j ws ri , j ws (rp (i ))
ws rp ( j ) wp (i ) wp (i, i ) wp (i, j ) ws (ri , j )
w p i, i R fe
wp i ws rp (i)
wp (i ) wp (i,1) wp (i,2) wp (i, n)
wslip j
wslip i 1 r (1) r (2)
(1)rp (1) ln m (2)rp (2) ln m
R fe r r
i ,1 i,2
r ( n)
(n)rp (n) ln m
ri , n
rp (1) rm (1) r ( 2) r ( n)
ln rp ( 2) ln m rp (n) ln m
R fe r1,1 r1, 2 r1,n (1)
w p (1)
w ( 2) rm (1) rp ( 2) rm ( 2) r ( n)
p rp (1) ln r
ln
rp (n) ln m (2)
2,1 R fe r2, 2 2,n
r
w ( n)
p rp (n) rm ( n) ( n)
The slip of pile does not affect to adjacent piles
r ( 2) ln settlement.
r ( 2)
r
r (1) ln rm (1)
p r
m
ln
rn ,n
p
i j n,1 n,2 R fe
10/24
Raft-Soil-Pile Interaction
Apparent stiffness reduction of pile by raft
ws (0) wp
1
ws (1) wnet (0) 0
2
ws (2) wnet (1)
wnet ( 4)
wnet (i ) wp (i ) ws (i )
11/24
Raft-Soil-Pile Interaction
Apparent stiffness reduction of soil spring in raft by piles
node i node i
ws,raft ws,pile
+ pile j
node i Q(i )
ks , raft (i)
ws,piled raft(i)= ws,raft (i)+ ws,pile(i) ws , raft (i )
Q(i ) Q(i )
ks , piled raft (i)
ws , piled raft (i) ws , raft (i ) ws , pile (i )
ws , raft (i )
ks , piled raft (i) k s , raft (i )
ws , raft (i ) ws , pile (i )
12/24
Raft-Soil-Pile Interaction
Stiffness hardening of piles by raft would be considered by increasing the effective stress and
unit skin friction
z qs
q psu
v (i, z )
q psu
pile i w
qpsu : ultimate unit skin friction
13/24
Piled Raft
Single Raft Single Pile
z(m) Es(kPa)
0
1 Er = 30,000,000 kPa
Br = 6m
2 Lr = 6m
3 tr = 1.2m
4
5
6 Ep = 30,000,000 kPa
Dp = 0.5m
7
Lp = 10m
8
9 = 18kN/m3
c =0
10 = 30
11 np = 33
spacing = 2m
12
15/24
Conclusions
An approximate method has been developed for the practical design
of piled raft foundations, which analyze non-linear behaviors and soil-
structure interaction effects efficiently in multi-layered soils.
Further Study
Intelligent soil spring
Linear spring for raft-soil interaction was applied in this study.
Intelligent soil spring is needed to model true raft-soil interaction
and depend on the followings;
the relative stiffness of the raft and soil
the plan size and shape of the foundation
the distribution of applied loading on the raft
Intelligent soil spring will be determined by the iterative process of
soil spring reaction and ground settlement analysis.
Variable shape of raft foundation
Field test
Proto type field test
Centrifuge test
24/24
Thank you