Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Advantages and
disadvantages
Problems of the Existing DAS System -Too much nodes bring too much
hidden troubles, hard troubleshooting because of invisible management
Many RF devices
Splitter, combiner,
DAS System
splitter
coupler, 3dB bridge
Fiber
RRU
Signal Source
Macro Site, BBU+RRU DAS System
BBU Micro, Pico NMS could not manage DAS system.
Repeater
DAS is in the network monitoring blind
area
Hard to locate the problem
The traditional DAS system has too much nodes, which brings lots of hidden troubles to the network.
The traditional DAS system could not be managed by NMS, so it is hard to locate the network problem.
QCell Solution Overview
pBridge
Fiber to Cable
Bridge
Quad-Band:
Integrated
850M/1.8G/2.1G/2.6G, Power for
Multi-mode integrated design pRRUs
pBridge
Quality Assurance:
Flexible cell splitting and
combination, BBU
Multi-mode
pBridge
2x2 MIMO,
Cloud coordination
Comparison of Different In-Building Service Solution
Active DAS (Qcell/ Lampsite) Traditional DAS Femto Cell
Simple Architecture. Easy Too many nodes, Passive elements Too many additional Network Element :
System
expansion, Technology increase insertion loss, hard to IP modern, Femto OSS, AAA, AHR,
Architecture
agnostic expand Security GW and AG.
Customizable in different Large Size coverage(Shopping Mall Small Size coverage (Street shops
Scenario
Scenario etc.) etc)
Capacity support MIMO, Capacity limited by antenna. One Femto one cell
One or Multiple pRRU / cell. Hard to expansion. High Interference
Multi-mode, Multi-band , Antenna system hard to evolve to Signal band and signal mode
Evolution
Smooth Evolution fully support UMTS/LTE MIMO etc. Cannt upgrade smoothly