Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Chapter 4 - Statistics
We have already
seen in Chapter 3
that all laboratory
measurements
have errors.
The Two Types of Errors are
Determinate Errors
Random Errors
Determinate Errors systematic errors that cause
a measurement to always be too high or too low
which can be traced to an identifiable source.
Examples include
Use of an uncalibrated or faulty tool or
instrument
Use of wrong values, such as molar mass,
conversion factor, etc.
A good way to detect the existence of
determinate errors is to use different methods of
analyzing the same material.
Random Errors errors that are random in nature.
They occur when a calibrated instrument is correctly
used to its most sensitive degree of measurement.
For example, using the analytical balance (sensitivity
of 0.1mg), you see variations in the last digit when
re-weighing the same object. In this chapter we will
focus our attention on ways to evaluate random
errors.
o All measurements have some random errors.
No measurements contain experimental errors.
Statistics allows us to accept conclusions that
have a high probability of being correct and to
reject conclusions that have a low probability.
o Statistics apply only to random errors; the
analyst would eliminate all determinate errors
before making sensitive measurements.
Random errors follow a Gaussian distribution of
values about the central measurement.
A Gaussian distribution is characterized by the mean
value and a standard deviation
xmean = i (xi) / n
0.0319/(6-1) = 0.00638
________
s = (0.00638) = 0.0798 = 0.08 or 0.080 to use the
authors method.
Note that s is reported to the number of decimal places as the data.
median = 18.55
For the ideal Gaussian distribution 68.3% of the
measurements lie within 1 (standard
deviation) of the mean value, 95.5% within 2
and 99.7% within 3.
1) The Q-Test
Occasionally in a set of data there is one value that appears
to not belong with the rest of the set. If the experimenter
is aware of some mistake or malfunction, she/he do not
need to employ one of these tests to reject that result. If no
known error has occurred (so that the suspect result
appears to be random, the analyst is then faced with
whether to retain or reject this suspect value. He/she needs
some sound basis for their decision, not just eyeballing it.
Your textbook describes one such test, the Q-test. After I
have discussed the Q-test, I will then discuss two
additional less rigorous, but useful tests for rejection of
suspect data.
Rejection of Suspect Data
40
Rejection of Suspect Data
di =
% Acid Note (x i -x mean ) |di |
10.19 0.06 0.06
10.08 -0.05 0.05
10.52 (?) 0.39
10.13 0 0
x mean reject ? 10.13 sum di 0.11
avg d 0.037
2.5 x avg d 0.093
4 X avg d 0.147
Rejection of Suspect Data
di =
% Acid Note (x i -x mean ) |di |
10.19 0.06 0.06
10.08 -0.05 0.05
10.52 (?) 0.39
10.13 0 0
x mean reject ? 10.13 sum di 0.11
avg d 0.037
2.5 x avg d 0.093
4 X avg d 0.147
Rejection of Suspect Data