ACPA 2018 Pipe School - Murfreesboro,Tennessee ACI 350 Strength Design

ACPA 2018 Pipe School - Murfreesboro,Tennessee
ACI 350
James Zarrinpour, M.S, EIT

Forterra Pipe & Precast
Overview:
 ACI 350-06 Scope

 Chapter 9- Strength And Serviceability
Requirements
 How To Apply ACI 350-06 Requirements
To ET Culvert for RCB Design
 Comparison Between ET Culvert
Results and ACI 350-06
2 Rigid Rugged Resilient
ACI 350-06 Scope
 Environmental Engineering Concrete

Structures
 Concrete Structures Intended for:
• Conveying
• Storing, or Treating liquids
• Secondary Containment
• Ancillary Structures

ACI 350-06 Scope
Precast Concrete Environmental Structures

Designed in Accordance With ASTM or
AWWA Standards , Except Circular tanks
Are Not Covered in ACI 350-06

Chapter 9
Strength And Serviceability Requirements
 General:
ACI 350-06 Adopted The strength design
Procedure
 Design Strengths ≥ Required Strengths
 Adequate Performance At Service Load Levels

Chapter 9
 Load Factors:
Load Factors
𝑈 = 1.4(𝐷 + 𝐹)
𝑈 = 1.2 𝐷 + 𝐹 + 𝑇 + 1.6 𝐿 + 𝐻 + 0.5(𝐿𝑟 𝑜𝑟 𝑆 𝑜𝑟 𝑅)
𝑈 = 1.2𝐷 + 1.6 𝐿𝑟 𝑜𝑟 𝑆 𝑜𝑟 𝑅 + (1.0 𝐿 𝑜𝑟 0.8𝑊)
𝑈 = 1.2𝐷 + 1.6𝑊 + 1.0 𝐿 + 0.5(𝐿𝑟 𝑜𝑟 𝑆 𝑜𝑟 𝑅)
𝑈 = 1.2𝐷 + 1.2𝐹 + 1.0 𝐸 + 1.6𝐻 + 1.0𝐿 + 0.2𝑆
𝑈 = 0.9𝐷 + 1.2𝐹 + 1.6 𝑊 + 1.6𝐻
𝑈 = 0.9𝐷 + 1.2𝐹 + 1.0 𝐸 + 1.9𝐻

Chapter 9
 Reduction Factors:
Load Reduction Factors
Shear And Torsion 0.75

Chapter 9
 Balance Condition:
Tension Reinforcement Reaches The Strain
Corresponding To its fy Just As Concrete in
Compression Reaches its Assumed Ultimate
Strain of 0.003
 Compression Controlled Section:
Net Tensile Strain in The Extreme Tension Steel
is Equal to or Less Than The Compression-
controlled Limit At The Time The Concrete in
Compression Reaches its Assumed Ultimate
Strain of 0.003
Chapter 9
 Tension Controlled Section:
Net Tensile Strain in The Extreme Tension Steel
is Equal to or Greater Than 0.005 Just As The
Concrete in Compression Reaches its Assumed
Strain Limit of 0.003

Chapter 9
Required Strength for Other Than Compression
Controlled Sections Shall be Multiplied By Sd
∅ 𝑓𝑦
𝑆𝑑 = ≥ 1.0
𝛾 𝑓𝑠
∅: Strength reduction Factor
f𝑦: Yield Strength
𝐹𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑑 𝐿𝑜𝑎𝑑
𝛾=
𝑈𝑛𝑓𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑑 𝐿𝑜𝑎𝑑
f𝑠: Permissible Tensile Strength

Chapter 9
 Normal Environmental Exposure:
 One-Way:
320
20000𝑝𝑠𝑖 ≤ 𝑓𝑠,𝑚𝑎𝑥 = ≤ 36000𝑝𝑠𝑖
2
2 𝑑𝑏
𝛽 𝑠 +4 2+
2

Chapter 9
 Normal Environmental Exposure:
 Two-Way:
320
24000𝑝𝑠𝑖 ≤ 𝑓𝑠,𝑚𝑎𝑥 = ≤ 36000𝑝𝑠𝑖
2
2 𝑑𝑏
𝛽 𝑠 +4 2+
2

Chapter 9
 Severe Environmental Exposure:
 One-Way:
260
17000𝑝𝑠𝑖 ≤ 𝑓𝑠,𝑚𝑎𝑥 = ≤ 36000𝑝𝑠𝑖
2
𝑑𝑏
𝛽 𝑠2 +4 2+
2

Chapter 9
 Severe Environmental Exposure:
 Two-Way:
260
20000𝑝𝑠𝑖 ≤ 𝑓𝑠,𝑚𝑎𝑥 = ≤ 36000𝑝𝑠𝑖
2
𝑑𝑏
𝛽 𝑠2 +4 2+
2

Chapter 9
Strain Gradient Amp. Factor:
ℎ−𝑐
𝛽=
𝑑−𝑐
ℎ: Overall Thickness Of Member
c: Distance From Extreme Compression Fiber To

N.A
d: Distance From Extreme Compression Fiber To
Centroid of Tension Reinforcement

Chapter 9
It Shall Be Permitted To Use β Equal To:

1.2 ℎ ≥ 16 𝑖𝑛.
𝛽=ቊ
1.35 ℎ < 16 𝑖𝑛
It Shall Be Permitted To Use 25 for The term
𝑑𝑏 2
4 2+ as a Simplification
2
𝑠: C-C Spacing of Deformed Bar
𝑑𝑏 : Normal Dia. of Bar, Wire, or Pre-stressing
Strand
How To Apply ACI 350-06 Requirements To
ET Culvert For RCB Design
Start
Build A Model in
ET Culver Using Build A Model In
Load Factors As ET Culver Using
Prescribed in Service Loads
AASHTO LRFD
Shear Steel
Required ?
Extract MDsgn , Ma For Yes Extract MDsgn , Ma , V For

No
Critical Section From ET Critical Section From ET
Culvert Result Sheets Culvert Result Sheets
Find Sd

Find Sd
Flexure Design Shear Design
Is Sd ≥ 1?
Multiply MDsgn By Sd At Yes Yes Multiply VDsgn By Sd At

Critical Section Critical Section
and Compare With Ma and Compare With ∅𝑉𝑐
Is MDsgn ≥ Ma ? No Is VDsgn ≥ ∅𝑉𝑐 ?
No No
End

Is MDsgn ≥ Ma ? Is VDsgn ≥ ∅𝑉𝑐 ?
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Option 1 Option 2 Option 1 Option 2
Recalculate Recalculate
Increase As And Increase Av And
Required As Using Required Av For
Compare Ma with Compare ∅𝑉𝑐 with
Pipe Eq. And P-M Shear Design
MDsgn VDsgn
Diagram Load
Repeat Repeat
Previous Previous
Step Until Step Until
MDsgn ≤ Ma VDsgn ≤ ∅𝑉𝑐
End End

Example:
We Are Asked To Design A Box Culvert 6’x4’,
Under Direct Traffic (Fill=20’) According To ACI
350-06 Using ET Culvert
8’’
4’
7’’
7’’
7’’
7’’














Comparison Between ASTM C1577
ET Culvert Results, ACI 350-06

Reference
• AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design

Specifications, 7th Ed., American
Association of State Highway and
Transportation Officials, 2014.
• Code Requirements for Environmental
Engineering Concrete Structures and
Commentary (ACI 350-06)

Questions
James Zarrinpour, M.S, EIT

Forterra Pipe & Precast

ACPA 2018 Pipe School - Murfreesboro,Tennessee ACI 350 Strength Design

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

ACPA 2018 Pipe School - Murfreesboro,Tennessee ACI 350 Strength Design

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

ACPA 2018 Pipe School - Murfreesboro,Tennessee

James Zarrinpour, M.S, EIT

 ACI 350-06 Scope

 Environmental Engineering Concrete

3 Rigid Rugged Resilient

Precast Concrete Environmental Structures

4 Rigid Rugged Resilient

 Design Strengths ≥ Required Strengths

 Adequate Performance At Service Load Levels

5 Rigid Rugged Resilient

6 Rigid Rugged Resilient

Load Reduction Factors

Shear And Torsion 0.75

7 Rigid Rugged Resilient

9 Rigid Rugged Resilient

10 Rigid Rugged Resilient

11 Rigid Rugged Resilient

12 Rigid Rugged Resilient

13 Rigid Rugged Resilient

14 Rigid Rugged Resilient

c: Distance From Extreme Compression Fiber To

15 Rigid Rugged Resilient

It Shall Be Permitted To Use β Equal To:

Extract MDsgn , Ma For Yes Extract MDsgn , Ma , V For

17 Rigid Rugged Resilient

Flexure Design Shear Design

Multiply MDsgn By Sd At Yes Yes Multiply VDsgn By Sd At

Is MDsgn ≥ Ma ? No Is VDsgn ≥ ∅𝑉𝑐 ?

18 Rigid Rugged Resilient

Option 1 Option 2 Option 1 Option 2

19 Rigid Rugged Resilient

20 Rigid Rugged Resilient

21 Rigid Rugged Resilient

22 Rigid Rugged Resilient

23 Rigid Rugged Resilient

24 Rigid Rugged Resilient

25 Rigid Rugged Resilient

26 Rigid Rugged Resilient

27 Rigid Rugged Resilient

28 Rigid Rugged Resilient

29 Rigid Rugged Resilient

30 Rigid Rugged Resilient

31 Rigid Rugged Resilient

32 Rigid Rugged Resilient

33 Rigid Rugged Resilient

34 Rigid Rugged Resilient

• AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design

35 Rigid Rugged Resilient

James Zarrinpour, M.S, EIT

You might also like