You are on page 1of 48

|





2 


Managerial Accounting, Fourth Edition


ACTIVITY-BASED COSTING
| 
 VERSUS
TRADITIONAL COSTING

@raditional Costing Systems


Allocates overhead using a single predetermined
rate.
Job order costing: direct labor cost is assumed
to be the relevant activity base.
Process costing: machine hours is the relevant
activity base.

Assumption was satisfactory when direct labor


was a major portion of total manufacturing costs.
Wide acceptance of a high correlation between
direct labor and overhead costs.
Traditional Costing Systems
| 


irect labor is still often the appropriate basis for


assigning overhead costs when:

irect labor constitutes a significant part of total product cost


O 
High correlation exists between direct labor and changes in overhead costs

Overhead irect Labor Products


Costs Hours/ollars
Need for a New Approach
| 

@remendous change in manufacturing and service
industries.

ecrease in amount of direct labor usage.

Significant increase in total overhead costs.

May be inappropriate to use plant-wide


predetermined overhead rates based on direct labor
or machine hours when a lack of correlation exists.

Complex manufacturing processes may require


multiple allocation bases; this approach is called
Activity-Based Costing (ABC).
Activity-Based Costing (ABC)
| 


An overhead cost allocation system that allocates


overhead to multiple activity cost pools
O 
Assigns the activity cost pools to products or
services by means of cost drivers that represent the
activities used.
Activity-Based Costing (ABC)
| 

Terms

Activity: any event, action, transaction, or work


sequence that causes a cost to be incurred in
producing a product or providing a service.

Activity Cost Pool: a distinct type of activity.


For example: ordering materials or setting up
machines.

Cost rivers: any factors or activities that have a


direct cause-effect relationship with the
resources consumed.
The Logic Behind ABC
| 


`  O
 
O 
O
    
Activity-Based Costing (ABC)
| 


ABC allocates overhead costs in two stages:

Stage 1: Overhead costs are allocated to activity


cost pools.

Stage 2: @he overhead costs allocated to the cost


pools is assigned to products using cost
drivers.

@he more complex a product¶s manufacturing


operation, the more activities and cost drivers likely
to be present.
Activities and Related Cost Drivers
| 

ABC System Design ² Lift Jack Company
| 

| 
Traditional Costing

vs. ABC

ABC   replace an existing job


order/process cost system.

ABC  segregate overhead into various


cost pools to provide more accurate cost
information.

ABC, thus, supplements ±    O ±


the traditional cost system.
Traditional Costing

|  vs. ABC
An Illustration

Atlas Company produces two automotive antitheft devices:


 @he Boot: a high volume item with sales totaling 25,000 per year
 @he Club: a low volume item with sales totaling 5,000 per year

Each product requires 1 hour of direct labor


 @otal annual direct labor hours (LH) 30,000 (25,000 + 5000)
 irect labor cost $12 per unit for each product

Expected annual manufacturing overhead costs $900,000

irect materials cost:


 @he Boot - $40 per unit
 @he Club - $30 per unit
Unit Costs Under Traditional Costing
| 


Products

Manufacturing Costs @he Boot @he Club


Direct Materials $40 $30
Direct Labor 12 12
Overhead 30* 30*
@otal unit cost $82 $72

* Predetermined overhead rate: $900,000/30,000 DLH = $30 per DLH


Overhead = predetermined overhead rate times direct labor hours
($30 X 1 hr. = $30)
|| | |
||
Π
 
      

      

       
 
  
      
          
     
    
 
 2   
      

      
 
Unit Costs Under ABC:
| 
Step 1: Identify
 Activities and
and Classify
Allocate Overhead to Cost Pools

Activity Cost Pools Estimated Overhead


|etting up machines $300,000
Machining 500,000
Inspecting 100,000
Total $900,000
Unit Costs Under

|  ABC:
Step 2: Identify Cost Drivers

Expected Use
of Cost rivers
Activity Cost Pools Cost rivers Per Activity
|etting up machines Number of setups 1,500
Machining Machine hours 50,000
Inspecting Number of
Inspections 2,000
Unit Costs Under

|  ABC:
Step 3: Compute Overhead Rates

Formula for Computing Activity-Based Overhead Rate:

Estimated Overhead Per Activity Activity-Based

Expected Use of Cost rivers Per Activity Overhead Rate

Expected Use
Estimated of Cost rivers Activity-Based
Activity Cost Pools Overhead Per Activity Overhead Rates
|etting up machines $300,000 1,500 setups $200 per setup
Machining 500,000 50,000 machine hrs. $ 10 per mach. hour
Inspecting 100,000 2,000 inspections $ 50 per inspection
Total $900,000
Unit Costs Under ABC:
| 

Step 4: Assign Overhead Costs to Products
Part 1: Expected Use of Cost Driver Per Product

Expected Use
of Cost rivers
per Product
Expected Use
Activity Cost of Cost rivers
Pools Cost river Per Activity @he Boot @he Club
|etting up Number of
machines setups 1,500 setups 500 1,000
Machining Machine hours 50,000 hours 30,000 20,000
Inspecting Number of
inspections 2,000 inspections 500 1,500
Unit Costs Under

|  ABC:
Step 4: Assign Overhead Costs to Products
Part 2: Assign Cost Pools to Products

@he Boot

Expected Use of Activity-Based


Activity Cost rivers X Overhead = Cost
Cost Pools per Product Rates Assigned
|etting up machines 500 $200 $100,000
Machining 30,000 10 300,000
Inspecting 500 50 25,000
Total costs assigned $425,000
Units produced 25,000
Overhead cost per unit $17
Unit Costs Under ABC:
| 
Step 2: Assign
 to Products
Overhead Costs
Part 2: Assign Cost Pools to Products

@he Club

Expected Use of Activity-Based


Activity Cost rivers X Overhead = Cost
Cost Pools per Product Rates Assigned
|etting up machines 1,000 $200 $200,000
Machining 20,000 10 200,000
Inspecting 1,500 50 75,000
Total costs assigned $475,000
Units produced 5,000
Overhead cost per unit $95
| 
Comparison
 Costs
of Unit
Traditional vs. ABC

@he Boot @he Club


@raditional @raditional
Manufacturing Costs Costing ABC Costing ABC
Direct Materials $40 $40 $30 $30
Direct Labor 12 12 12 12
Overhead 30 17 30 95
Total Cost per Unit $82 $69 $72 $137

Overstated Understated
$13 $65
Comparison of Unit Costs
| 

Traditional vs. ABC
   
 2    

 
      
 
         
 
    
Π    
       
  

 2   
 2 
           
  
 
|  Costing:
Activity-Based

A Closer Look

More accurate product costing through:


XUse of more cost pools to assign overhead costs
XEnhanced control over overhead costs
XBetter management decisions
| 
Activity-Based Costing:

A Closer Look
Limitations of ABC

 Can be expensive to use


 Some arbitrary allocations continue
Activity-Based Costing:
| A

Closer Look
Use ABC When One or More of the Following Exist:
Products differ greatly in volume/manufacturing complexity
Products lines are
 umerous
 iverse
 Require different degrees of support services
Overhead costs are a significant portion of total costs
Significant change in manufacturing process or number of
products
Managers ignore data from existing system and instead use
³bootleg´ costing data
| Let·s Review



Activity-based costing (ABC):

a. Can be used only in a process cost system


b. Focuses on units of production
c. Focuses on activities performed to
produce a product
d. Uses only a single basis of allocation
| Let·s Review



Activity-based costing (ABC):

a. Can be used only in a process cost system


b. Focuses on units of production
c. Focuses on activities performed to
produce a product
d. Uses only a single basis of allocation
| Value-Added vs.


Non-Value-Added Activities

Activity Based Management (ABM):

An extension of ABC from a product costing


system to a management function
O   O   

O    O 
A refinement of ABC used in ABM classifies
activities as either value-added or non-value-
added.
Value-Added vs.
| 

Non-Value-Added Activities

Ôalue-Added Activity
2 O
O  O 
O  
O
Manufacturing Company Service Company
engineering design performing surgery
machining legal research services
assembly delivering packages
painting
packaging
Value-Added vs.
| 

Non-Value-Added Activities

on-Ôalue-Added Activities
2 O
OO    O 
   O 
   O  
O 
OO:
Manufacturing Company Service Company
Repair of machines @aking appointments
Storage of inventory Reception
Moving of raw materials, Bookkeeping/billing
assemblies, and finished goods @raveling
Building maintenance Ordering supplies
Inspections
Inventory Control
CLASSIFICATION OF
|ACTIVITY


LEVELS

Unit-level activities:
Performed for each unit of production
Batch-level activities:
Performed for each batch of product
Product-level activities:
Performed in support of an entire product line, but
not always performed every time a new unit or
batch is produced
Facility-level activities:
Required to support or sustain an entire production
process
Hierarchy of Activity Levels
| 

Four Levels @ypes of Activities Cost rivers
Unit-Level Activities Machine-related Machine Hours
Drilling, cutting, milling
Labor-related Direct labor hours/cost
Assembling, painting
Batch-Level Activities Equipment setups Number of setups/setup time
Purchase ordering Number of purchase orders
Inspection Number of inspections or
inspection time
Material handling Number of material moves
Product-Level Activities Product design Number of product designs
Engineering changes Number of changes
Facility-Level Activities Plant management Number of employees
salaries managed
Plant Building depreciation |quare footage
Property taxes |quare footage
Utilities |quare footage
Activity-Based Costing
|in

Service Industries

Similarities with Manufacturing Firms


Overall objective:
½   O  O
 O   O
O  O
     O
 


0eneral approach is to identify activities, cost pools,


and cost drivers

Labeling of activities as value-added or non-value-


added

Reduction of non-value-added activities


   
| 




 !"# $%&

2 

2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2



 
  
  
 
   


  
 

 
      2   
 

         !    " 


  #

 
$

 % %& &'( %'( & % )'& * & )'+ )'( %, %

- "
  $ 2  "  . ,,    /





 % , %'( %'( & % )'& & & )'+ )'( %) %

"
  

 2  "  . &0
-    /
|  Costing
Activity-Based

in Service Industries

Major difficulty to implementing


ABC:
A larger proportion of overhead
costs are company-wide costs
that O  be directly traced to
specific services.
Activity-Based Costing in Service Industries:
| 

@raditional Costing Example

CHECK A OUBLECHECK, CPAs


Annual Budget

Revenue $2,000,000
Direct labor $ 600,000
Overhead (expected) 1,200,000
Total Costs 1,800,000
Operating income $ 200,000

Estimated overhead
= Predetermined overhead rate
Direct labor cost

$1,200,000
= 200%
$600,000
Activity-Based Costing in Service Industries:
| 

@raditional Costing Example

CHECK A OUBLECHECK, CPAs


Plano Molding Company Audit

Revenue $260,000
Less: Direct professional labor $ 70,000
Applied Overhead (200% x $70,000) 140,000 210,000
Operating Income $ 50,000
Activity-Based Costing in Service Industries:
| 

ABC Costing Example
CHECK A OUBLECHECK, CPAs
Annual Overhead Budget
Expected Use
Activity Cost Estimated ÷ of Cost rivers = Activity-Based
Pools Cost rivers Overhead Per Activity Overhead Rates
Secretarial support irect Prof. hours $ 210,000 30,000 $7 per hour
irect labor Fringe benefits irect labor cost 240,000 $ 600,000 $0.40 per $1 labor
Printing and photocopying Working paper pages 20,000 20,000 $1 per page
Computer support CPU minutes 200,000 50,000 $4 per minute
@elephone and postage one (traced directly) 71,000 /A Based on usage
Legal support Hours used 129,000 860 $150 per hour
Insurance Revenue billed 120,000 $2,000,000 $0.06 per $1 rev.
Recruiting and training irect Prof. Hours __210,000 30,000 $7 per hour
$1,200,000
Activity-Based Costing in Service Industries:
| 

ABC Costing Example
CHECK A OUBLECHECK, CPAs
Plano Molding Company Audit
Activity-
Based-
Activity Cost Actual Use Overhead
Pools Cost rivers of rivers Rates Cost Assigned
Secretarial support irect Professional hours 3,800 $ 7.00 $ 26,600
irect labor Fringe benefits irect labor cost $ 70,000 $ 0.40 28,000
Printing and photocopying Working paper pages 1,800 $ 1.00 1,800
Computer support CPU minutes 8,600 $ 4.00 34,400
@elephone and postage one (traced directly) 8,700
Legal support Hours used 156 $150.00 23,400
Insurance Revenue billed $260,000 $ 0.06 15,600
Recruiting and training irect Prof. Hours 3,800 $ 7.00 26,600
$165,100
Activity-Based Costing in Service Industries:
| 

ABC Costing Example
CHECK A OUBLECHECK, CPAs

Plano Molding Company Audit

@raditional Costing ABC


Revenues $260,000 $260,000
Expenses
irect professional labor $ 70,000 $ 70,000
Applied overhead 140,000 165,100
@otal expenses 210,000 235,100
Operating income $ 50,000 $ 24,900

Profit Margin 19.2% 9.6%


Appendix
| 

Just-In-@ime Processing (JI@)

2   OO



O O O     O 
O
OO      
O 
   
JUST |
IN

TIME PROCESSING
.
     
     





 


   
  

0 
 
| JIT Processing


„
½ 
  OOO O 
  

Elements of JI@:
X ependable suppliers
X Multi-skilled work force
X @otal quality control system

Benefits of JI@:
X Reduced inventory
X Enhanced product quality
X Reduced rework and storage costs
X Savings from improved flow of goods
Let¶s Review
| 


An activity that adds costs to the product but


does not increase market value is a
a. Value-added activity
b. Cost driver
c. Cost-benefit activity
d. Nonvalue-added activity
Let¶s Review
| 


An activity that adds costs to the product but


does not increase market value is a
a. Value-added activity
b. Cost driver
c. Cost-benefit activity
d. Nonvalue-added activity

| 


| 


| 


You might also like