Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Outline
Background Information Problem Statement
Analysis of Facts
Alternative Courses of Action Conclusions and Recommendations Summary
Thomas Manufacturing
producer of home air purifiers faced with supply cost increases
Problem Statement
What supply chain strategy should Thomas Manufacturing pursue to remain competitive despite the threat of increasing costs?
Battle
Purchasers
Mr. Older
increase inventory levels
of the
Tim Younger
lower stock re-order levels and reduce inventory
maintain good relations with current suppliers explore lower-cost suppliers and disregard public relations
Battle
Purchasers
Increase number of requests for bids make aggressive negotiations and fewer concessions
of the
maximize discounts
purchase to current requirements rather than to market conditions standardize parts place blanket purchase orders
Analysis of Facts
Competitive Priorities
1. Cost importance 2. Quality importance
Competitive Priorities
1. Cost importance firm does not primarily compete on cost
it is only recently that management has become rather critical of supply costs firm only seeks to reduce costs, not completely drive them down still have a lot of areas where cost can be reduced current inventory investment is not costefficient
Competitive Priorities
2. Quality importance implied as firms competitive priority 3. Delivery Time Schedule firm rarely encounters problems regarding time
current inventory levels are always high production never stopped for lack of material
Competitive Priorities
4. Flexibility Importance firm shows flexibility in openness to changing supply chain strategy to maintain value delivered to customers and remain competitive
Mutually Exclusive
lower stock re-order levels and reduce inventory explore lower-cost suppliers and disregard public relations everything else
Advantages
presence of long-term partnering relationships
partners understand objectives of Thomas and its customers creates learning curve that yields both lower and transaction and production costs partners can provide design innovations and technological expertise may establish and take advantage of Keiretsu network
Advantages
allows economies of scale more efficient tried and tested quality less control risk: already have established controls builds loyalty through ample inventory no opportunity loss and opportunity cost
Disadvantages
higher costs of materials firm continues to carry burden of reducing cost
Advantages
allows firm to source lowest-cost parts transfers burden of reducing cost to supplier
Disadvantages
gives up benefits of long-term relationships diffused volume limits the use of economies of scale
less efficient
untested quality vendor evaluation and development costs more control risk opportunity loss from back orders
Conclusion
Thomas competitive strategy is differentiation, not cost leadership Reduce cost without completely redesigning supply chain ACA 1 is the more attractive solution
Increase stock turn and lower inventory levels through aggregate planning
Summary
Summary
A firms supply chain strategy must always be aligned with the operations strategy
It should support the firms competitive priorities and provide value to the product.
Thank you!