Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Contents and Trademarks are intellectual property of the author and thus proprietary in nature
Outline
Long-term Behaviors of Stock Market Short-term Behaviors of Stock Market A Holistic Framework for Stock Valuations A Unified Model for Value Investing Business Model Analysis for Value Investing
Pay 50 Cents for a Dollar A Dollars Intrinsic Value is always a Dollar! Pay 50 Cents for a stock whose Intrinsic Value is a
How to determine the Intrinsic Value is a Dollar? (Valuation) When the Market will offer you 50 Cents for a share whose Intrinsic Value is a Dollar? (Patience)
P E* PE
(Gee! Any 7th Grader can be the Next Buffett!)
Cruise Speed
Head/Tail Wind
Good News
You can predict the stock price change 30 days from today with the companys past financial and price information
Bad News
--Event-Driven Volatility (fast reaction to company news) --Error-Driven Volatility (residual reaction to company news) --Price-Driven Volatility (purely driven by market sentiment) Price-Driven Volatility contributes to 80% of the total Volatility Price-Driven Volatility is unpredictable and thus indivertible Historically the yearly S&P 500Price Volatility has been around +/- 20% from the yearly average price; thus maintaining a Margin of Safety >20% helps minimize the chance of having near-term losses due to short-term volatility
C.T. Wus 2010 Formula Fair PE = 8.5 + 1.5 * G (based on Post WW II Regression Data)
The CJPR Holistic Valuation Framework* Reference from Chuck Carnevale (Mr. Valuation)
Fair P/E= 8.5 + G/2 Fair P/E = 8.5 + G Fair P/E = 8.5 + G/2 +D G=10-15% Fair P/E = 8.5 + G/2 +D
G<= 15%
G>=20%
G<5%
F5 JNPR ARUN
Emergent Growth
Fast Growth
Stable Growth
Mature
1. 2. 3. 1. 2. 3.
Investment Vector = (Expected IRR in N Years, Risk Level) or IV= (IRR-N, Risk Level) (Risk is the most undefined and ambiguous term in Finance!) Enhanced Investment Vector (EIV) =(IRR-N, 1- Risk Level) or EIV = (IRR-N, Confidence Level) where Risk Level + Confidence level = 1 Risk Level: (0 ~ 1) Confidence Level: (0~1) Why the Efficient Market Hypothesis is Erred? Its Key Assumptions: The higher the Risk Level, the higher the Reward. The market is always efficient. You can not outperform the market, use full diversification to mitigate the risk. Fact: Only the market mechanism is efficient. The market results are often inefficient because the majority of market participants are inefficient.
--Personal understanding of the industry --Personal understanding of the business model --Personal understanding of the management team --Personal understanding of the balance sheet quality --Personal understanding of the potential technological substitute threats
Buffett: I have 2 views on diversification. If you are a professional and
have confidence, then I would advocate lots of concentration. For everyone else, if it is not your game, participate in total diversificationCharlie and I normally operate with 5 positions
* Minimize the chance of having near-term losses due to Price Volatility * Create long-term gain when the Margin of Safety gap is closed by the market (e.g., from 20% undervalued to 20% overvalued in PE Ratio)
Concentrate on a few well studied stocks that have superior
EIV= (IRR-5, Confidence Level) profile based on the investors Circle of Competence * Buffett: Investment is all about Compounding!
* Alice Schroeder*: Buffett requires each investment to have at least
15% IRR.
Unified Model Consider making an investment bet when --IRR-5 >= 20% --Confidence Level >=80% (via Business Model Analysis) --Current PE <= (1 Beta * 20%) * Fair PE Ratio Consider selling when Current PE >= (1 + Beta*20%) * Fair PE Ratio Focus on 3-5 solid investment targets a year
Sell
$
portfolio setup (researched) buy/sell decisions (systematic) trade size decisions (systematic) timing (systematic)
Buy
Current PE much lower than Fair PE (The difference is the Margin of Safety) Wide Moat Quality Premium Wide Moat Quality stocks consistently outperformed No Moat stocks by an average IRR of 3% historically Small Cap Growth Premium Double-counting effect (Price= EPS * PE): 3-6% IRR extra gain Business Model Optimization (BMO) Premium* 2-3% IRR per year (IBM is the most viable case-in-point)
(* Courtesy of the Author)
Competitors Moves
Financial Outcomes (ROE, Earning Growth Rate, Asset Quality, Debt Ratio)
Goal for Business Model Optimization Creating sustainable and growing EPS (excluding stock buy-back effect) Adopt a Growth Strategy that is continuously leveraging the business CORE possessing high entry barriers --The most critical part of Business Model Optimization --Most public companies failed at adopting the right Core-Centric Growth Strategy; 3 in 4 acquisitions turned out to be big failures
Align business Internal Organizational Economies with the evolving Core-centric Growth Strategy --Most public companies are nave about Internal Organizational Economy; especially not aware of Economy of Scope only applies to the same customer group which is the major cause for acquisition failures (Russ Ackoffs Multi-dimensional Organization)
Conclusion
Enhanced Value InvestingTM is a systematic way of achieving superior long-term
1. Stock Market System Behaviors --Long-term Predictability vs. Short-term Volatility (i.e., Complex Adaptive System characteristics) 2. Competitive Business System Behaviors --Business Model Analysis and Optimization 3. The CJPR Holistic Valuation Framework 4. A Unified Model for Asset Investment: EIV= (IRR-N, Confidence Level)
A Chronological Evolution of Value InvestingGeneration 1: Ben Graham (1934) Generation 2: Warren Buffett (1980) Generation 2.5: Bruce Greenwald (2001) Generation 3: Enhanced Value InvestingTM (2011)
Contents and Trademarks are intellectual property of the author and thus proprietary in nature
Case Studies
Visa
IBM
Apple Juniper
Altria
Aruba
VISA
IBM
APPLE
JUNIPER
ALTRIA
ARUBA