You are on page 1of 46

Case Analysis: Baldwin Bicycle Company (BBC)

By Jie Lan Marion Paul Phillip


@Copyright by Group 6 B8109 1

Table of Contents
Part 1. Introduction Part 2. Quantitative Analysis (Q. 1-5) Part 3. Qualitative Analysis (Q. 6) Part 4. Decision Time (Q. 7)

@Copyright by Group 6 B8109

Introduction

@Copyright by Group 6 B8109

BBC Overview
Manufactures and sells bikes to independent bike stores Above average in quality and price $10M annual sales. Sales declined in past 2 years Factory operating at reduced capacity

@Copyright by Group 6 B8109

Hi-Valu Proposal
Sell bikes to a department store chain Use Challenger Label. Annual Sales of 25,000. Extra inventory costs Sell at lower than usual wholesale prices Small one time design costs 3 year deal, 6 month notice to opt out. We have unused factory capacity
@Copyright by Group 6 B8109 5

Costs
$83.90 to manufacture. $92.29 selling price
Split between materials, labor, direct overhead and indirect overhead.

Asset Related Costs


Cost of funds, Record keeping, inventory insurance, tax on inventory, inventory handling, pilferage and damage
@Copyright by Group 6 B8109 6

Costs (continued)
Inventory
Raw materials Work in progress Finished goods in house Finished goods outside the factory.

Accounts Payable

@Copyright by Group 6 B8109

Risks
Loose 3000 sales of regular line of bikes Existing independent stores may drop our products

@Copyright by Group 6 B8109

Alternatives
Refuse proposal and continue business as usual Accept the Hi-valu proposal. Negotiate the Hi-Valu proposal Approach another department store for a better deal. Business as usual but lower our prices
@Copyright by Group 6 B8109 9

Question 1.
What is the expected added profit from the Challenger line?

@Copyright by Group 6 B8109

10

Q.1 What is the expected added profit from the Challenger line?
Added profit, does not include cannibalization Contribution = added sales added cost Added cost: variable cost fixed cost one time cost (R&D) asset related cost (expenses)

@Copyright by Group 6 B8109

11

Q.1 What is the expected added profit from the Challenger line?
added cost (per unit) = variable cost (per unit)
= materials + direct labor +variable part of overhead

= $39.8 + = $69.2

$19.6

($24.5 40%)

@Copyright by Group 6 B8109

12

Q.1 What is the expected added profit from the Challenger line?
Estimated sale of Challenger 25,000 per year Average price $92.29 per bike
Total Contribution = unit contribution #of units sold

($92.29 - $69.2) 25,000 = $577,250


@Copyright by Group 6 B8109 13

Question 2.
What is the expected impact of cannibalization of existing sales?

@Copyright by Group 6 B8109

14

Q.2 What is the expected impact of cannibalization of existing sales?


Challenger has competitive advantage loss of 3000 sale per year Current dealers drop line, loss of more sales Impact of cannibalization = loss of profit margin

=decrease in sales revenue decrease in cost of sales

@Copyright by Group 6 B8109

15

Q.2 What is the expected impact of cannibalization of existing sales?


Decrease in sales revenue of regular products
= average unit price decrease in number of units sold

($10,872,000 / 98,791) 3,000 = $330,151.53

@Copyright by Group 6 B8109

16

Q.2 What is the expected impact of cannibalization of existing sales?


Only variable cost sensitive to change in volume Using Challengers unit fixed cost as an estimate Decrease in cost of sales = decrease in variable cost = unit variable cost decrease in volume = (total unit cost per unit fixed cost) 3000 = ($8,045,000 / 98,791 - $24.5 60%) 3,000 = $200,203.63
@Copyright by Group 6 B8109 17

Q.2 What is the expected impact of cannibalization of existing sales?


Impact of cannibalization =decrease in sales revenue decrease in cost of sales = $330,151.53 - $200,203.63 = $129,947.90 Based on assumption that fixed cost per unit doesn't change from regular products to Challenger line Based on estimated loss of sales of 3,000 units Possible that sales decrease exceeds 3,000 if any current dealer drops line, impact could be greater
@Copyright by Group 6 B8109 18

Question 3.
What costs will be incurred on a one-time basis only?

@Copyright by Group 6 B8109

19

Q.3 What costs will be incurred on a one-time basis only?


Preparing drawings a/o arranging parts and materials different than standard models $5,000 Not production cost Treated as R&D cost

@Copyright by Group 6 B8109

20

Q4: what are the additional assets and related carrying cost? increase in inventories Baldwins
warehouse

increase in inventories Hi-Valus warehouse


Increase in receivables

@Copyright by Group 6 B8109

21

The Calculation of the Additional Assets


categories items
materials raise in inventory --- Baldwin's warehouse work in process finished goods raise in inventory --- Hi-Valu's warehouse

amount
165,833.33 61,850.00 41,950.00

calculation
39.8 * 25000 / 12 * 2 [39.8+(19.6+24.5)/2] * 1000 83.9 * 500

average 2 months waiting time in warehouse

349,583.33

83.9 * 25,000/12*2

raise in receivable accounts

1month collection period

192,270.83

92.29 * 25000 / 12

Additional Assets :

165,833.33 + 61,850 + 41,950 + 349,583.33 + 192,270.83= 811,487.49

@Copyright by Group 6 B8109

22

Asset-related costs


Pretax Cost of funds
(Inventories and receivables )

11.5%

Recordkeeping Costs (Inventories and receivables ) Inventory Insurance State Property Tax on Inventory Inventory-handling Labor and Equipment Pilferage, Obsolescence, Damage, etc.
Total

2.0% 0.6% 0.7% 6.0% 2.2%


23%

@Copyright by Group 6 B8109

23

Assets-related Costs

categories

items

amount

calculation

inventory-related costs --- Baldwin's warehouse

23% of dollar value of inventories

62,015.67

(165,833.33 + 61,850 + 41,950) * 23%

inventory-related costs --- Hi-Valu's warehouse

17% of dollar value of inventories

59,429.17

349,583.33 * 17%

receivable-ralated costs

13.5% of dollar value of receivable account

25,956.56

192,270.83 * 13.5%

related carrying costs :

62,015.67 + 59,429.17 +25,956.56 = 147,401.40

@Copyright by Group 6 B8109

24

Q5: what is the overall impact on the company in terms


of (a) profits, (b) return on sales, (c) return on assets, and (d) return on equity?

The most direct way to solve this problem is to assume accepting the contract and to calculate the each

measure after that.


For the lack of information, we need make many assumptions and estimations in process.

@Copyright by Group 6 B8109

25

To calculate the Net Income


Measures Revenue Cost of sales Gross Margin Expenses 1988 (volume=98,791) 10,872,000.00 8,045,000.00 2,827,000.00 (3) after adopting the contract (first year) (1) (2) 12,982,149.54 9,673,250.73 3,308,898.81 152,401.4 Assumptions

Other Expenses
Income before Taxes

2,354,000.00
473,000.00

2,354,000.00
802,497.41

There is not obvious change in other expenses

Income Tax Ratio

46.00%

46.00%

The increase in sales is not sufficient to use higher Tax Ratio

Income Tax Expense Net Income

218,000.00 255,000.00

369,148.81 433,348.6

@Copyright by Group 6 B8109

26

(1) Revenue after adopting the contract


Calculatio n

regular production

Calculation

Challenger

10,674,899.54

10,872,000 /98,791 * 97,000

2,307,250

92.29 * 25000

Total Revenue :

12,982,149.54

@Copyright by Group 6 B8109

27

(2) Total costs after adopting the contract


regular production Calculation Challenger Calculation

7,943,250.73

8,045,000 / 98,791 * 97,000 + 44,100

1,730,000

69.2*25000

Total Cost:

963,250.73

*** $44,100 ---- The fixed costs of 3000 units


44,100 = 19.6 *125%* 60% * 3000

@Copyright by Group 6 B8109

28

To calculate the Net Income


Measures Revenue Cost of sales Gross Margin Expenses Other Expenses Income before Taxes Income Tax Ratio Income Tax Expense Net Income 2,354,000.00 473,000.00 46.00% 218,000.00 255,000.00 1988 (volume=98,791) 10,872,000.00 8,045,000.00 2,827,000.00 (3) after adopting the contract (first year) (1) (2) 12,982,149.54 9,673,250.73 3,308,898.81 152,401.4 2,354,000.00 802,497.41 46.00% 369,148.81 433,348.6 The increase in sales is not sufficient to use higher Tax Ratio There is not obvious change in other expenses Assumptions

@Copyright by Group 6 B8109

29

(3) Expense
Research and Development Expense:
one-time added costs of preparing drawings and/or arranging sources for fenders, seats, handlebars, tires, and shipping boxes that differ from those used in our standard modes; approximately $5,000

Expenses caused by the increase of assets:


$147,401.4

@Copyright by Group 6 B8109

30

To calculate the Net Income


Measures Revenue Cost of sales Gross Margin Expenses Other Expenses Income before Taxes Income Tax Ratio Income Tax Expense Net Income 2,354,000.00 473,000.00 46.00% 218,000.00 255,000.00 1988 (volume=98,791) 10,872,000.00 8,045,000.00 2,827,000.00 (3) after adopting the contract (first year) (1) (2) 12,982,149.54 9,673,250.73 3,308,898.81 152,401.4 2,354,000.00 802,497.41 46.00% 369,148.81 433,348.6 The increase in sales is not sufficient to use higher Tax Ratio There is not obvious change in other expenses Assumptions

@Copyright by Group 6 B8109

31

The impact to each measure


Measures Net Income Return on Sales Assets Return on Assets = Net Income/ Assets Equity Return on Equity = Net Income/ Equity 1988 after adopting the (volume=98,791) contract (first year) 255,000.00 2.35% 8,092,000.00 3.15% (4) Impact

433,348.60 increase 3.34% increase 9,336,836.09 increase 4.64% increase

3,102 8.22% (5)

3,535,348.6 increase 12.26% increase

@Copyright by Group 6 B8109

32

(4) The change of Asset


Extreme Conditions 9,336,836.09 = 8,092,000 + 811,487.49 + 433,384.6
BALDWIN BICYCLE COMPANY
Balance Sheet As of December 31,1988
(In thousand)

Assets Case Accounts Receivable Inventories Pant and Equipment (net) $342 1,359 2,756 3,635 $8,092

Liabilities and owners equity Current liabilities Noncurrent liabilities Total liabilities Owners equity $3,478 1,512 4,990 3,102 $8,092

@Copyright by Group 6 B8109

33

The impact to each measure


Measures Net Income Return on Sales Assets Return on Assets = Net Income/ Assets Equity Return on Equity = Net Income/ Equity 1988 after adopting the (volume=98,791) contract (first year) 255,000.00 2.35% 8,092,000.00 3.15% (4) Impact

433,348.60 increase 3.34% increase 9,336,836.09 increase 4.64% increase

3,102 8.22% (5)

3,535,348.6 increase 12.26% increase

@Copyright by Group 6 B8109

34

Question 6
Identify those consequences that cannot be expressed in quantitative terms and evaluate them against each other and against the measured consequences. Answers question #6: What are the strategic risks and rewards?

@Copyright by Group 6 B8109

35

Risks
Cannibalization Damage to Brand Image Problems with Small Dealers Impact to Inventory Buyer Monopoly Decrease in Demand

@Copyright by Group 6 B8109

36

Reward$
Profit$$$$$ New Market$ Investment Opportunity New Technology Initial Public Offering (IPO) Plant Utilization Supplying Other Department Stores Capture Market Trend
@Copyright by Group 6 B8109 37

Decision Time

@Copyright by Group 6 B8109

38

Decision - Next Steps


Market Analysis
Contract Negotiations

@Copyright by Group 6 B8109

39

Decision Market Analysis


Determine scope and diversity of new market Aid in negotiating contract Reveal new target segments Identify other clients for new line
@Copyright by Group 6 B8109 40

Decision Contract Negotiations


Negotiate Price

Profit Margin Calculation Profit Margin (New) Profit Margin (Old) Difference Unit profit / Unit cost = $8.39 / $83.90 = 10% Unit profit / Unit cost = $28.62 / $81.43 = 26.6% (26.6 10) / 26.6 = 63.8% = 64% Decrease

@Copyright by Group 6 B8109

41

Decision Contract Negotiations


Negotiate Minimum Volume
Break Even Calculation Total Fixed Cost (TFC) $14.70 x 25000 = $367,500 + 5000/3 = $369,166.67 $92.29 $69.20 UR UVC = $92.29 $69.20 = $23.09 $23.09 / $92.29 = 25% XB = TFC / Contribution = 15,988 units
@Copyright by Group 6 B8109 42

$5000 one time fixed cost over the first 3 years of the contract

Unit Revenue (UR) Unit Variable Cost (UVC) Unit Contribution Contribution % Break Even Point

Decision Contract Negotiations


Negotiate Brand co-ownership

@Copyright by Group 6 B8109

43

Decision Conclusion
Reasonable Quantitative Risk / Reward Ratio Reasonable Qualitative Risk / Reward Ratio
Accept the deal

@Copyright by Group 6 B8109

44

Questions ?

@Copyright by Group 6 B8109

45

Thank You!

@Copyright by Group 6 B8109

46

You might also like